Document Detail


Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11882728     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The increased risk of low birth weight associated with the use of assisted reproductive technology has been attributed largely to the higher rate of multiple gestations associated with such technology. It is uncertain, however, whether singleton infants conceived with the use of assisted reproductive technology may also have a higher risk of low birth weight than those who are conceived spontaneously. METHODS: We used population-based data to compare the rates of low birth weight (less-than-or-equal 2500 g) and very low birth weight (<1500 g) among infants conceived with assisted reproductive technology with the rates in the general population. RESULTS: We studied 42,463 infants who were born in 1996 and 1997 and conceived with assisted reproductive technology and used as a comparison group 3,389,098 infants born in the United States in 1997. Among singleton infants born at 37 weeks of gestation or later, those conceived with assisted reproductive technology had a risk of low birth weight that was 2.6 times that in the general population (95 percent confidence interval, 2.4 to 2.7). The use of assisted reproductive technology was associated with an increased rate of multiple gestations; however, its use was not associated with a further increase in the risk of low birth weight in multiple births. Among twins, the ratio of the rate of low birth weight after the use of assisted reproductive technology to the rate in the general population was 1.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.1). Infants conceived with assisted reproductive technology accounted for 0.6 percent of all infants born to mothers who were 20 years of age or older in 1997, but for 3.5 percent of low-birth-weight and 4.3 percent of very-low-birth-weight infants. CONCLUSIONS: The use of assisted reproductive technology accounts for a disproportionate number of low-birth-weight and very-low-birth-weight infants in the United States, in part because of absolute increases in multiple gestations and in part because of higher rates of low birth weight among singleton infants conceived with this technology.
Authors:
Laura A Schieve; Susan F Meikle; Cynthia Ferre; Herbert B Peterson; Gary Jeng; Lynne S Wilcox
Related Documents :
23661328 - Mercury (hg) exposure in breast-fed infants and their mothers and the evidence of oxida...
3495368 - Application of case management to the control of acute respiratory infections in low-bi...
11227618 - Adenosine deaminase in cord blood as an immunoenzyme marker in low birth weight neonates.
21333248 - Abetalipoproteinemia in a saudi infant.
11847948 - Alteplase use for prevention of central line occlusion in a preterm infant.
2160348 - Impaired trapping of tc-99m pertechnetate in the salivary glands of patients with conge...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The New England journal of medicine     Volume:  346     ISSN:  1533-4406     ISO Abbreviation:  N. Engl. J. Med.     Publication Date:  2002 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-03-07     Completed Date:  2002-03-13     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0255562     Medline TA:  N Engl J Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  731-7     Citation Subset:  AIM; E; IM    
Affiliation:
Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. LJS9@cdc.gov
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant, Low Birth Weight*
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Infant, Very Low Birth Weight*
Infertility
Male
Middle Aged
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Multiple
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / adverse effects*
Risk Factors
Triplets / statistics & numerical data
Twins / statistics & numerical data
United States
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 31;347(18):1451-2; author reply 1451-2   [PMID:  12416507 ]
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 31;347(18):1451-2; author reply 1451-2   [PMID:  12409553 ]
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 7;346(10):769-70   [PMID:  11882734 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization.
Next Document:  Hepatocytes and epithelial cells of donor origin in recipients of peripheral-blood stem cells.