Document Detail


Long-term pulmonary vascular reactivity after orthotopic heart transplantation by the biatrial versus the bicaval technique.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21335194     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
INTRODUCTION: Advantages of the bicaval versus the biatrial technique have been reported, emphasizing atrial electrical stability and less tricuspid regurgitation.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of the surgical technique on long-term pulmonary pressures, contractility, and graft valvular behavior after heart transplantation.
METHODS: Among 400 orthotopic heart transplantation recipients from 1985 to 2010, we selected 30 consecutive patients who had survived beyond 3 years. The biatrial versus bicaval surgical technique groups included 15 patients each. Their preoperative clinical characteristics were similar. None of the patients displayed a pulmonary vascular resistance or pulmonary artery pressure over 6U Wood or 60 mm Hg, respectively. We evaluated invasive hemodynamic parameters during routine endomyocardial biopsies. Two-dimensional echocardiographic parameters were obtained from routine examinations.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences regarding right atrial pressure, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, cardiac index, systolic blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction, and mitral regurgitation (P > .05). Tricuspid regurgitation increased significantly over the 3 years of observation only among the biatrial group (P = .0212). In both groups, the right atrial pressure, pulmonary wedge capillary pressure, transpulmonary gradient, and pulmonary vascular resistance decreased significantly (P < .05) from the pre- to the postoperative examination. In both groups cardiac index and systemic blood pressure increased significantly after transplantation (P < .05). Comparative analysis of the groups only showed significant differences regarding right atrial pressure and degree of tricuspid regurgitation; the bicaval group showing the best performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical techniques ensure adequate left ventricular function in the long term; however, the bicaval technique provided better trends in hemodynamic performance, as well as a lower incidence and severity of tricuspid valve dysfunction.
Authors:
A I Fiorelli; R H B Santos; J L Oliveira; M A F Da Silva; V P Dos Santos; F M P Rêgo; G E Souza; F Bacal; E A Bocchi; N A G Stolf
Related Documents :
2506754 - Antihypertensive drugs and baroreflex sensitivity. effects of rilmenidine.
15498964 - Blood pressure power within frequency range approximately 0.4 hz in rat conforms to sel...
16809454 - Evidence for a respiratory component, similar to mammalian respiratory sinus arrhythmia...
11772794 - Heart rate variability and arterial blood pressure variability show different character...
8248974 - Relationship of transcranial doppler flow velocities and arteriovenous malformation fee...
9530294 - Pneumatosis intestinalis: a review.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Transplantation proceedings     Volume:  43     ISSN:  1873-2623     ISO Abbreviation:  Transplant. Proc.     Publication Date:    2011 Jan-Feb
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-02-21     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0243532     Medline TA:  Transplant Proc     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  229-32     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Heart Institute of Sao Paulo University Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Successful endomyocardial biopsy guided by transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography.
Next Document:  Lung transplantation for patients older than 65 years: is it a feasible option?