Document Detail


Long-term follow-up of primary and secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21208947     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Aims The beneficial effects of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in primary and secondary prevention patients are well established. However, data on potential differences between both groups in mortality and ICD therapy rates during long-term follow-up are scarce. The aim of the study was to assess differences in mortality and ICD therapy between secondary and primary prevention ICD recipients. Methods and results With the exception of patients with congenital monogenetic cardiac disease, all patients treated with an ICD, regardless of the underlying cardiac pathology, from 1996 to 2008 at the Leiden University Medical Center were included in the current analysis. The study population was grouped by the type of prevention (secondary or primary) for sudden cardiac death. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of device therapy (appropriate or inappropriate). A total of 2134 (80% men, mean age 63 ± 12 years) ICD recipients were included. Of these, 1302 (61%) patients received an ICD for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death and 832 (39%) patients for secondary prevention. During a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 2.8 years, 423 (20%) patients died. The 5-year cumulative incidence of mortality was 25% [95% confidence intervals (CI): 21-29%] for primary prevention patients and 23% (95% CI: 20-26%) for secondary prevention patients. Secondary prevention patients exhibited a 74% increased risk for appropriate therapy when compared with primary prevention patients [hazard ratios (HR): 1.7; P< 0.001]. A comparable risk for inappropriate shocks was observed (HR: 1.0; P= 0.9). Conclusion During long-term follow-up, primary prevention patients exhibited a lower risk of appropriate therapy, but comparable mortality rates were observed between both groups. Both groups showed similar occurrence of inappropriate shocks.
Authors:
Guido H van Welsenes; Johannes B van Rees; C Jan Willem Borleffs; Suzanne C Cannegieter; Jeroen J Bax; Lieselot van Erven; Martin J Schalij
Related Documents :
10696927 - Pulse steroid therapy in adult respiratory distress syndrome following petroleum naphth...
10084037 - Tuberculosis prophylaxis in patients with steroid treatment and systemic rheumatic dise...
12131307 - Steroid therapy for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: dose and duration.
24447727 - Higher baseline international normalized ratio value correlates with higher mortality i...
22999067 - A smaller endotracheal tube combined with intravenous lidocaine decreases post-operativ...
15617587 - Pituitary apoplexy.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-1-5
Journal Detail:
Title:  Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1532-2092     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-1-6     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100883649     Medline TA:  Europace     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
1Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The relationship between right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation burden and disease progres...
Next Document:  Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in...