Document Detail


Long-term outcomes of primary craniofacial reconstruction for craniosynostosis: a 12-year experience.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21311385     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to critically assess long-term outcomes after open reconstruction of craniosynostosis within the recent decade.
METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective, institutional review board-approved review of open repair for craniosynostosis between 1997 and 2009. Surgical factors, complications, and long-term outcomes were assessed. Pearson chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Of 212 patients, 72 underwent primary extended synostectomy and 140 had traditional open craniofacial repair. Mean follow-up was 36.3 months (range, 0.5 to 138 months). Indications included sagittal (n = 96), metopic (n = 40), unicoronal (n = 33), bicoronal (n = 24), multisutural (n = 15), bilambdoidal (n = 3), and unilambdoidal (n = 1) synostoses; 8.5 percent of patients were syndromic. Surgical reconstruction was performed at a mean age of 11.3 months (range, 0.2 to 117.8 months), including nonsyndromic patients at an average age of 10.6 months and syndromic patients at age 19.3 months. There were no deaths. A 3.3 percent complication rate included two cerebral contusions, two hematomas, one cerebrospinal fluid leak, one infection, and one wound breakdown. Patients were categorized as 89.2 percent Whitaker class I/II and 10.8 percent Whitaker class III/IV. Major and total reoperation rates were 9.0 percent and 10.8 percent, respectively. Higher total reoperation rate and Whitaker class III/IV distribution significantly correlated with syndromic diagnosis, bicoronal synostosis, and surgical age younger than 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: In this experience of contemporary open craniosynostosis surgery, rates of morbidity, mortality, and reoperation were low. These results support the merits of surgical delay, targeting an age of 6 months or older, and may serve as a more accurate metric of comparison to current minimally invasive techniques for craniosynostosis repair.
Authors:
Mitchel Seruya; Albert K Oh; Michael J Boyajian; Jeffrey C Posnick; John S Myseros; Amanda L Yaun; Robert F Keating
Related Documents :
15336745 - Clinical experience with end-to-side nerve transfer.
1593145 - Intrathecal buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia in orthopaedic surgery.
556895 - Abdominal pain and alcohol celiac plexus nerve block.
20976505 - The effect of injection speed on the spinal block characteristics of hyperbaric bupivac...
12358385 - Subacromial decompression. treatment for small- and medium-sized tears of the rotator c...
19292105 - Periosteoplasty--a new technique for recession coverage.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Plastic and reconstructive surgery     Volume:  127     ISSN:  1529-4242     ISO Abbreviation:  Plast. Reconstr. Surg.     Publication Date:  2011 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-05-30     Completed Date:  2011-08-10     Revised Date:  2014-10-13    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  1306050     Medline TA:  Plast Reconstr Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2397-406     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Child
Child, Preschool
Craniosynostoses / surgery*
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Postoperative Complications
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures / adverse effects
Reoperation
Treatment Outcome

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Long-Term Outcome After Microendoscopic Discectomy (MED) for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Prospective C...
Next Document:  Free tissue transfer with distraction osteogenesis is effective for limb salvage of the infected tra...