Document Detail

Long-Term Results of Implants Immediately Placed Into Extraction Sockets Grafted With β-Tricalcium Phosphate: A Retrospective Study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23351769     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
PURPOSE: The aim of this 10 year retrospective study was to evaluate the crestal bone loss around immediate implant placed in tricalcium phosphate (TCP) grafted extraction sockets
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from files of 58 patients (33 females, 25 males, average age 54.78 years) undergoing immediate implant placement into fresh extraction socket with or without the use of TCP (Cerasorb, Curasan AG, Kleinostheim, Germany) grafting. After implant placement, horizontal gaps larger than 1.5 mm between the implant surface and the bony plate were grafted with TCP without the use of a membrane, while smaller gaps were not grafted. Two hundred fifty-four implants were inserted: 79 were placed immediately with the use of β-TCP as grafting material (group A), 175 were placed in healed extraction sites, with 61 implants placed with the use of β-TCP graft material (group B), and 114 implants were placed without any grafting material (group C). Bone loss recordings were performed using periapical radiography. Measurements were performed from the neck of the implant to level of the surrounding bone in the vertical dimension.
RESULTS: No implant was lost during the follow-up period. Statistical analysis showed no correlation between implant placement timing (delayed or immediate), the use of bone graft, and extent of bone loss.
CONCLUSION: The use of TCP (Cerasorb) as a grafting material during immediate implant placement allowed no bone loss in 72.1% of the implants, which was very similar to the nongrafted cases for which implants were placed in favorable conditions.
Noga Harel; Ofer Moses; Adi Palti; Zeev Ormianer
Related Documents :
23057039 - Influence of lateral window dimensions on vital bone formation following maxillary sinu...
24421999 - Peri-implant tissue findings in bone grafted oral cancer patients compared to non bone ...
25060089 - Unnecessary shock from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator following transcutaneo...
21492799 - Guided surgery for implant therapy.
24819809 - Implants placed in sites of previously failed implants: a systematic review.
23478009 - Is mammary reconstruction with the anatomical becker expander a simple procedure? compl...
20416539 - Bacterial leakage in obturated root canals-part 2: a comparative histologic and microbi...
20382389 - Design of a custom angled abutment for dental implants using computer-aided design and ...
17000119 - Between session reproducibility and between subject variability of diffusion mr and tra...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons     Volume:  71     ISSN:  1531-5053     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.     Publication Date:  2013 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-01-28     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8206428     Medline TA:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  e63-8     Citation Subset:  AIM; D; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Instructor, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Maxillary reconstruction with bone transport distraction and implants after partial maxillectomy.
Next Document:  Biomechanical evaluation of undersized drilling on implant biomechanical stability at early implanta...