Document Detail


Localized ridge augmentation/preservation. A systematic review.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  14971259     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Osseointegrated implants have been documented as efficacious, however, their placement may be contraindicated in some patients due to insufficient bone volume. Techniques such as guided bone regeneration (GBR), immediate implantation, and distraction osteogenesis (DO) have been utilized as ridge enhancement therapies.
RATIONALE: This systematic review evaluates dental implant survival rates in patients treated with ridge augmentation or preservation techniques.
FOCUSED QUESTION: In patients requiring dental implant placement, what is the effect of localized ridge preservation versus implant placement without augmentation on implant survival and adverse effects?
SEARCH PROTOCOL: MEDLINE and Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialized Trial Register were searched. Hand searches were performed on Clinical Oral Implants Research, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Journal of Periodontology, and Journal of Periodontal Research. All searches were performed for articles published through April 2002.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Publications reporting survival rate of dental implants following ridge therapy were included in the analysis. Reports describing techniques were excluded.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Due to the absence of controlled studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. Descriptive statistics are used to report the data.
MAIN RESULTS: 1. A total of 18 studies were included: 13 reporting on guided bone regeneration (GBR, 1,741 patients) and 5 on distraction osteogenesis (DO, 92 patients). 2. There is a high level of predictable implant survival in sites treated by GBR or DO. 3. These survival rates are similar to those of implants placed in native bone. REVIEWERS' INTERPRETATIONS: Survival rates were similar for both GBR and DO implants. These survival rates were similar to implants placed in native bone.
Authors:
Joseph P Fiorellini; Marc L Nevins
Related Documents :
11168219 - Implant placement in the maxillary tuberosity: the summers' technique performed with mo...
18717379 - Sinus floor elevation using an osteotome technique without grafting materials or membra...
14703759 - Sinus/alveolar crest tenting (sact): a new technique for implant placement in atrophic ...
7870789 - Frontal sinus obliteration: a comparison of fat, muscle, bone, and spontaneous osteoneo...
9477859 - Indirect sinus augmentation procedures using one-stage anatomically shaped root-form im...
15227769 - Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants placed in sites augmented with sinus f...
17923409 - Bone healing process in critical-sized defects by rhbmp-2 using poloxamer gel and colla...
22739239 - Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab upload followed by a dexamethasone implant versu...
15646589 - Lesion orientated caries treatment--a classification of carious dentin treatment proced...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Annals of periodontology / the American Academy of Periodontology     Volume:  8     ISSN:  1553-0841     ISO Abbreviation:  Ann. Periodontol.     Publication Date:  2003 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-02-19     Completed Date:  2004-03-09     Revised Date:  2011-08-25    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9702874     Medline TA:  Ann Periodontol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  321-7     Citation Subset:  D    
Affiliation:
Department of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity, Division of Periodontology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. joseph_fiorellini@hsdm.harvard.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation / methods*
Bone Regeneration
Dental Implantation, Endosseous*
Dental Implants
Dental Prosthesis Retention
Dental Restoration Failure
Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal
Humans
Osteogenesis, Distraction
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Dental Implants

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Surgical therapies for the treatment of gingival recession. A systematic review.
Next Document:  Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic r...