|Lipoprotein particle distribution and skeletal muscle lipoprotein lipase activity after acute exercise.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 22672707 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|BACKGROUND: Many of the metabolic effects of exercise are due to the most recent exercise session. With recent advances in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMRS), it is possible to gain insight about which lipoprotein particles are responsible for mediating exercise effects.
METHODS: Using a randomized cross-over design, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) responses were evaluated in eight men on the morning after i) an inactive control trial (CON), ii) exercising vigorously on the prior evening for 100 min followed by fasting overnight to maintain an energy and carbohydrate deficit (EX-DEF), and iii) after the same exercise session followed by carbohydrate intake to restore muscle glycogen and carbohydrate balance (EX-BAL).
RESULTS: The intermediate, low and high density lipoprotein particle concentrations did not differ between trials. Fasting triglyceride (TG) determined biochemically, and mean VLDL size were lower in EX-DEF but not in EX-BAL compared to CON, primarily due to a reduction in VLDL-TG in the 70-120 nm (large) particle range. In contrast, VLDL-TG was lower in both EX-DEF and EX-BAL compared to CON in the 43-55 nm (medium) particle range. VLDL-TG in smaller particles (29-43 nm) was unaffected by exercise. Because the majority of VLDL particles were in this smallest size range and resistant to change, total VLDL particle concentration was not different between any of these conditions. Skeletal muscle lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity was also not different across these 3 trials. However, in CON only, the inter-individual differences in LPL activity were inversely correlated with fasting TG, VLDL-TG, total, large and small VLDL particle concentration and VLDL size, indicating a regulatory role for LPL in the non-exercised state.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal a high level of differential regulation between different sized triglyceride-rich lipoproteins following exercise and feeding, in the absence of changes in LPL activity.
|Michael Harrison; Niall M Moyna; Theodore W Zderic; Donal J O'Gorman; Noel McCaffrey; Brian P Carson; Marc T Hamilton|
Related Documents :
|10218377 - Long-term oxygen therapy: advances and perspectives in technical devices.
7221847 - Physiologic responses to operation in high risk surgical patients.
18228167 - History of developments in sport and exercise physiology: a. v. hill, maximal oxygen up...
6675687 - Exercise-induced increase of methaemoglobin concentration and low cooperativity in haem...
16510857 - Flight activity, mortality rates, and lipoxidative damage in drosophila.
6756277 - Clinical implications of pediatric exercise physiology.
|Type: Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2012-07-10|
|Title: Lipids in health and disease Volume: 11 ISSN: 1476-511X ISO Abbreviation: Lipids Health Dis Publication Date: 2012|
|Created Date: 2012-07-11 Completed Date: 2012-11-19 Revised Date: 2013-07-12|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101147696 Medline TA: Lipids Health Dis Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 64 Citation Subset: IM|
|Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland. firstname.lastname@example.org|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Exercise / physiology*
Lipoprotein Lipase / metabolism*
Lipoproteins / metabolism*
Lipoproteins, VLDL / metabolism
Muscle, Skeletal / enzymology*, metabolism*
Triglycerides / metabolism*
|P01-HL-052490/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS|
|0/Lipoproteins; 0/Lipoproteins, VLDL; 0/Triglycerides; 0/lipoprotein triglyceride; 0/very low density lipoprotein triglyceride; EC 22.214.171.124/Lipoprotein Lipase|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Lipids Health Dis
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Lipids Health Dis
Publisher: BioMed Central
Copyright ©2012 Harrison et al.
Received Day: 23 Month: 4 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 6 Month: 6 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 10 Month: 7 Year: 2012
Volume: 11First Page: 64 Last Page: 64
Publisher Id: 1476-511X-11-64
PubMed Id: 22672707
|Lipoprotein particle distribution and skeletal muscle lipoprotein lipase activity after acute exercise|
|Michael Harrison1||Email: email@example.com|
|Niall M Moyna2||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Theodore W Zderic3||Email: email@example.com|
|Donal J O’Gorman2||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Noel McCaffrey2||Email: email@example.com|
|Brian P Carson4||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Marc T Hamilton3||Email: email@example.com|
1Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland
2Centre for Preventive Medicine and School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
3Inactivity Physiology Department, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA, 70808, USA
4Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Single sessions of exercise transiently reduce serum triglycerides (TG). This exercise effect is not always apparent immediately post-exercise, it can occur after a delay of hours and is generally maximal on the day following intense and prolonged exercise [1,2]. Reductions in serum triglycerides of 18 – 22% are typically observed on the morning after a prolonged exercise bout . This effect is blunted when the energy  and carbohydrate  deficit induced by exercise is replaced during the hours post-exercise. Thus, studies of acute exercise on lipids and lipoproteins should ideally control for energy and carbohydrate intake in order to distinguish the effects of exercise and energy expenditure per se from the effects of an exercise-induced energy or carbohydrate deficit.
Classic lipid panels measure only the total amount of TG in plasma or cholesterol in low (LDL) or high (HDL) density lipoproteins. However, more advanced approaches are now capable of quantifying the concentration of LDL, HDL, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) particles of different size populations. Importantly, the nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMRS) determined lipoprotein size of particles and the concentration of specific lipoprotein particles have been associated with risk of diabetes  and cardiovascular disease [7,8] independent of typical biochemical assessments of TG and cholesterol. For example, large VLDL particles and small LDL particles were associated with greater prospective risk of type 2 diabetes after adjusting for standard lipids and other non-lipid risk factors . Defects in metabolism of large VLDL particles tend to drive the metabolic reactions producing small, dense pro-atherogenic LDL particles of abnormal size in tandem with lowering of anti-atherogenic HDL . To date, few studies have examined the influence of acute exercise on NMRS-determined VLDL lipoprotein particles.
Although understanding of the mechanisms underpinning the hypotriglyceridemic effects of exercise has advanced considerably in recent years, much remains to be learned . Post-exercise hypotriglyceridemia has frequently been linked to increased skeletal muscle lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity. However the evidence supporting this assertion is not compelling, particularly on the morning after exercise when serum TG are considerably reduced. Indeed, only two studies have examined LPL activity at this timepoint, with one showing an increase  and one showing no change . The need to consider energy balance in exercise studies examining TG metabolism has been recently identified . This may not have been fully appreciated in previous LPL studies, potentially accounting for discrepant results. More recently, research attention has focused on VLDL composition. Data from kinetic studies [13,14] suggest that the liver secretes fewer but more triglyceride rich VLDL particles on the morning after prolonged exercise, increasing particle affinity with LPL. These studies underline the potential of changes in VLDL particles to influence TG clearance by mechanisms other than LPL.
The purpose of this study was therefore to examine the influence of prolonged acute exercise on serum lipids, NMRS-determined lipoprotein subfractions and LPL activity in skeletal muscle. These assessments were undertaken ~12 h post-exercise when serum TG are known to be considerably reduced. The results of this study will for the first time quantify the influence of acute exercise on the size and concentration of 24 different VLDL subfractions. They will also clarify the effects of exercise on LPL activity in skeletal muscle and the role of this enzyme in mediating any observed changes in lipoprotein particles. The study involved two exercise trials, one with and one without carbohydrate replacement, in order to distinguish the effects of exercise per se from an exercise-induced energy deficit.
Eight moderately active men (mean ± SD; age 26.9 ± 4.1 y, VO2peak 46.8 ± 4.9 mL.kg-1.min-1, body mass, 83.5 ± 13.7 kg BMI, 26.0 ± 3.6 kg.m-2 body fat 15.2 ± 5.0%) volunteered for this study. Subjects were non-smokers, normolipidemic, free from cardiovascular disease and diabetes and not taking medication known to influence carbohydrate or lipid metabolism. Ethical approval was granted by the Dublin City University Research Ethics Committee and the Pennington Biomedical Research Center Institutional Review Boards. Written informed consent was also obtained. These methods and other data have been described in greater detail elsewhere .
On three test mornings, separated by 7 d approximately, subjects underwent a muscle biopsy followed by a blood sample for determination of lipids and lipoproteins. On the evening prior to one test morning, subjects rested quietly at home (CON). On the evening prior to two test mornings, subjects exercised in the laboratory. Following one of these exercise sessions, glucose was consumed to replete muscle glycogen and restore energy and carbohydrate balance (EX-BAL). Following the other exercise session (EX-DEF), only water was permitted, thus maintaining a CHO deficit and low muscle glycogen concentration. These trials were undertaken in random order. The experimental exercise sessions were conducted between 17.00 h and 19.00 h on the evening prior to the muscle biopsy and fasting blood sample. Subjects cycled for 90 min at a load equaling 70% VO2peak, followed by ten 1 min full effort sprints interspersed with 1 min of resting recovery. Expired air was collected continuously during the continuous cycling via a breath by breath metabolic system (Vmax 229, Sensormedics, Yorba Linda, CA). Energy expenditure and substrate oxidation was estimated using indirect calorimetry . Energy expenditure during the sprints was estimated from an ACSM metabolic equation  based on flywheel resistance and revolutions.
Diet was strictly standardized with subjects consuming 3 meals provided by the laboratory on the day prior to each test morning. These were consumed in all 3 trials at approximately 08.00, 12.00 and 16.00 h. This pre-test diet fed before each trial consisted of standardized mixed meals to provide 56% carbohydrate, 14% protein, and 30% fat. Subjects were required to abstain from alcohol and not to engage in exercise or heavy physical work outside of laboratory testing for 3 days prior to each trial. Subjects were reminded of these diet and activity requirements during phone contact in advance of each subsequent test day. Compliance was checked verbally.
In addition to the 3 standardized meals in each of the 3 trials, in one of the exercise conditions (EX-BAL) carbohydrate was provided with the intended purpose of restoring glycogen concentration. During the evening after exercise, subjects ingested 105% of the CHO oxidized during exercise, (4.4 ± 0.2 g.kg-1) and 94% of the total exercise energy expenditure. The intention was to restore both CHO and energy balance, while avoiding muscle glycogen supercompensation. Water was consumed at equivalent time-points in CON and EX-DEF. From indirect calorimetry, we calculated that 349 ± 17 grams of CHO were oxidized and the total energy expenditure during the exercise session was 1,507 ± 75 kcals. The replacement averaged 367 ± 18 grams CHO and 1,420 ± 69 kcals. This was achieved with an 18% CHO drink and 85% glucose confectionary consumed at 0, 2, and 4 hours after exercise, and then fasted for 10 hours.
Subjects travelled to the laboratory on each test morning by motorized transport. They had been fasting for at least 10 h. A muscle biopsy was obtained from the midway point of the vastus lateralis after local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine. Biopsies were obtained from the same leg for the first and third trial and from the alternate leg for the second trial. Samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until analysis. A fasting blood sample was obtained from a prominent forearm vein.
Lipoprotein lipase is an enzyme required for catabolyzing plasma triglyceride and generating fatty acids. A stable, radioactive substrate emulsion assay as originally developed  has been used extensively for examining skeletal muscle LPL activity responses to physical activity [18-20]. Muscle biopsy samples were homogenized in a buffer containing heparin (5 U.mL-1), 0.05 M Tris●HCl (pH 8.1), aprotinin (2 μg.mL-1), leupeptin (10 μg.mL-1), benzamidine (1 mM), pepstatin (1 μg.mL-1), EDTA (5 mM), and BSA (1 mg.mL-1) at a concentration of 10 mg of muscle per 350 μL buffer. LPL activity was measured by the rate of hydrolysis of a 3H] triolein containing substrate emulsified with lecithin, in the presence of pooled heat-inactivated human serum as the source of apolipoprotein C-II, fatty acid-free albumin and heparin. Assays were performed at 37°C for 100 min. One data point is missing in the EX-DEF and EX-BAL trials due to insufficient muscle. Serial dilutions of representative samples verified that the LPL assay was linear with time and amount of enzyme in the range that assays were performed.
Glycogen concentrations were determined in duplicate by a standard enzymatic technique  with fluorometric detection. Briefly, 2 mg of freeze-dried muscle was brought to −15°C from −80°C in a freezer. Samples were incubated in 0.5 mL of 2 N hydrochloric acid for 2 h at 100°C and then reconstituted to original weight with distilled H2O, before being neutralized with 1.5 mL of 0.67 N NaOH. One mL of reagent mix containing Tris base (50 mM), HCl (25 mM), MgCl2 (1 mM), DTT (0.5 mM), ATP (0.3 mM), NADP (0.05 mM), hexokinase (1 U.mL-1), and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (0.1 U.mL-1) was added to samples and glycogen content determined fluorometrically.
Serum was centrifuged at 1600 g for 15 min at 4°C. Total serum TG were determined using a spectrophotometric assay, performed on an automated bench-top clinical chemistry system (ACE®, Alfa Wassermann B.V., Netherlands), using appropriate reagents, calibrators and controls (Randox Laboratories, UK). Lipoprotein subclass analysis was performed from EDTA plasma through the use of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMRS) (LipoScience, Inc. Raleigh, NC). The particle concentration of each lipoprotein class was determined by measuring the amplitude of the lipid methyl groups which are distinct to each size and class . Conversion factors then relate these signal amplitudes to either particle concentration or lipid mass concentration units in conjunction with purified subclass lipid standards. The following 9 lipoprotein subclass categories were investigated in fasting plasma samples for particle concentration: large VLDL (55 to 260 nm), medium VLDL (43 to 55 nm), small VLDL (29 to 43 nm), IDL (23 to 27 nm), large LDL (21.2 to 23 nm), small LDL (18 to 21.2 nm), large HDL (8.8 to 13 nm), medium HDL (8.2 to 8.8 nm), and small HDL (7.3 to 8.2 nm). VLDL and LDL subclass particle concentrations are reported in units of nanomoles per liter and those of HDL subclasses in micromoles per liter. In addition to the three above broad VLDL subclasses, termed small, medium and large according to Liposcience cutoffs, triglyceride mass was described in 24 smaller VLDL subfractions (VLDL-TG). This detailed breakdown was examined to identify the particular ranges of VLDL in which TG is concentrated and the ranges that were most sensitive to exercise (Figure 1).
Between trial difference were determined using a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Fisher Least Significant Difference post-hoc tests. The TG and VLDL lipoprotein particle data were not normally distributed and so were log-transformed prior to analysis. Associations between selected variables were determined using Spearman rank order correlations. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
The workrates (197 ± 9 vs 197 ± 9 W), VO2 (33.4 ± 1.1 vs 33.2 ± 1.0 mL.kg-1.min-1), respiratory exchange ratios (0.96 ± 0.005 vs 0.96 ± 0.004) and heart rates (151 ± 3 vs 150 ± 4 b.min-1) during the 90 min of continuous cycling did not differ in EX-DEF and EX-BAL, respectively. Muscle glycogen was 2.3-fold higher on the morning following the EX-BAL bout compared to the EX-DEF bout (300 ± 23 vs. 128 ± 16 mmol.kg-1 DW, p < 0.05). The EX-BAL and CON (300 ± 23 vs. 316 ± 15 mmol.kg-1 DW, p = 0.18) values were not significantly different.
In all trials, VLDL particle concentration was highest in the small (29 – 43 nm) VLDL fraction (Table 1). The majority of the TG mass (VLDL-TG) was distributed in the larger particles of ~ 70–120 nm (Figure 1). Serum TG, determined biochemically, was lower (p < 0.05) in EX-DEF but not in EX-BAL compared to CON (Table 1). Large VLDL particle concentration was lower (p < 0.05) in EX-DEF but not in EX-BAL compared to CON with medium VLDL particle concentration lower (p < 0.05) in EX-DEF and EX-BAL compared to CON (Table 1). Small and total VLDL particle concentrations were not different across trials (Table 1). Mean VLDL particle size was smaller (p < 0.05) in EX-DEF, but not in EX-BAL compared to CON. IDL, LDL and HDL particle concentration and size were not different across trials (Table 1).
The 24-part VLDL subfraction analysis (Figure 1) indicates a number of VLDL triglyceride mass peaks, with the greatest mass of TG in particles of ~ 70–120 nm in diameter. In this 70–120 nm size range, a subset of large VLDL, the TG mass was lower (p < 0.05) in EX-DEF but not in EX-BAL compared to CON (Figure 1, Table 1). The subfraction analysis also reveals that in the medium sized particles, the TG mass was lower (p < 0.05) both in EX-DEF and EX-BAL compared to CON (Figure 1, Table 1). A small TG mass peak of ~225 nm was also obvious in all three trials (Figure 1).
LPL activity was not different in CON vs EX-DEF (n = 7, p = 0.74) or CON vs EX-BAL (n = 7, p = 0.50) (Figure 2). The intra-individual responses to exercise from CON were highly correlated in EX-DEF and EX-BAL (rho = 0.93, p < 0.05). There were inverse correlations that were either significant or approaching significance between the % change in LPL activity in CON vs. EX-DEF and the change in serum TG (rho = −0.89, p < 0.05), total VLDL-TG (rho = −0.79, p < 0.05), large VLDL-TG (rho = −0.75, p = 0.052), large VLDL particle concentration (rho = −0.71, p = 0.07), mean VLDL particle size (rho = −0.89, p < 0.05), small HDL particle concentration (rho = −0.75, p = 0.052) and small LDL particle concentration (rho = −0.93, p < 0.05). In CON, LPL activity was inversely correlated with serum TG, total VLDL-TG, total, large and small VLDL particle concentration and mean VLDL particle size (Table 2). There were few associations between LPL activity and lipoprotein particles in EX-DEF and EX-BAL (Table 2).
By using new NMRS analytical techniques to better resolve the concentration of lipoproteins of different sizes, this study has undertaken one of the most detailed characterizations to date of the effects of a single session of exercise on VLDL lipoprotein particle concentration and TG content. This involved two exercise trials, one with and one without carbohydrate refeeding. This allowed us to distinguish the effects of prior exercise on lipoproteins when there was an exercise-induced carbohydrate deficit and glycogen depletion (EX-DEF) from a very different metabolic situation when the post-exercise testing was associated with carbohydrate and energy balance (EX-BAL). In general, the findings reveal a high level of differential regulation between different sizes of VLDL with respect to exercise and feeding.
The NMRS technique provides new insights about the concentration of lipoprotein particles with more clarity than possible from biochemical methods. Although there are far more apoB-100 containing VLDL particles in the smaller sized range of the continuum (~29 – 43 nm), the TG content of VLDL per particle is considerably less than for larger particles. Particles in the 70–120 nm range (subset of large range) contain ~ 44% of the TG carried by VLDL particles. The present findings clearly indicate that the intensity and type of exercise utilized in this study which was glycogen depleting, was specifically impacting VLDL in a relatively narrow moderate-large size range (~43–120 nm). The smaller particles were resistant to reduction by either exercise condition, despite both the high intensity exercise (70-100% maximal aerobic power) and profound skeletal muscle glycogen depletion. Interestingly, this same type of lack of response was also seen in the very large particles. Within the “exercise responsive” range (~43–120 nm), all fractions did not respond identically. An important new insight was that the reduction in the TG mass in the 70 – 120 nm subset of large VLDL, the size range with the greatest TG mass, was primarily due to an exercise-induced carbohydrate deficit. This novel finding now explains why there was not a decrease in serum TG in EX-BAL (as measured with classical biochemical methods) on the morning following a very prolonged and intense bout of exercise. In contrast, the VLDL-TG in the medium range was unresponsive to the post-exercise carbohydrate feeding and was thus reduced in both exercise conditions, demonstrating an effect of exercise per se. A TG mass peak of ~ 225 nm is obvious in all three trials though it is possible that this represents the late entry of intestinally-derived chylomicrons into the circulation. These varied VLDL responses to different exercise conditions are not easy to explain mechanistically by any single factor such as increased skeletal muscle lipoprotein lipase activity.
Few previous studies have examined the influence of acute exercise on VLDL subfractions. In general agreement, Magkos et al.  reported a 36% (non significant) and 53% reduction in their NMRS analysis of relatively large and medium-sized VLDL particles respectively, with no change in smaller VLDL particle concentration. In characterizing the influence of acute exercise on VLDL subclasses using ultracentrifugation, Gill et al.  found that there was a greater absolute and percentage decrease in TG in the “large” VLDL1 subclass (Sf 60–400) but there was also a reduction in the “small” VLDL2 subclass (Sf 20–60). Although papers reporting particle size in various Svedberg flotation density ranges are sparse in the literature, data from one helpful paper  suggests the VLDL1 subclass (Sf 60–400) reported in the literature encompasses a number of particle size ranges above ~35 nm, essentially our large and medium particles, with the VLDL2 subclass (Sf 20–60) encompassing particles in the middle and lower end of our small range. The results of the present study are therefore in agreement with the findings of Gill et al.  with respect to VLDL1, though confirming an exercise effect in a number of subfractions within this range, but are not in agreement with their findings with respect to VLDL2. Gill et al.  have also suggested previously that there may be independent metabolic regulation of the VLDL1 and VLDL2 subclasses. The results of the present study suggest that there may be independent regulation of different VLDL pools even within the VLDL1 range.
Large VLDL may be more important for risk than medium and small VLDL . In theory, the more efficient metabolism of large VLDL as occurred in EX-DEF should lead to anti-atherogenic changes in four important lipoprotein parameters, an increase in large HDL concentration with increased mean HDL size and a decrease in small LDL concentration with increased mean LDL size . However, there were no changes in HDL, LDL or IDL subfractions or mean particle size in either exercise condition in the present study. Perhaps this is not surprising given the considerably longer half-life of LDL and HDL particles in the circulation . Changes in VLDL metabolism over a number of days may be necessary to influence LDL and HDL. Magkos et al.  reported an acute exercise increase in pro-atherogenic IDL in conjunction with a more efficient breakdown of VLDL particles. In contrast, IDL were directionally though not significantly lower in the present study.
Previously published postprandial data from this cohort  and from two other groups [4,27] show the hypotriglyceridemic effects of exercise to be attenuated or abolished with post-exercise feeding to restore energy and CHO balance. The results of one of these studies  suggest that post-exercise hypotriglyceridemia may relate more to a CHO deficit than an energy deficit. However the extent to which individuals replenish energy or CHO immediately post-exercise in “real world” settings is open to question. Using a different research design, prior exercise reduced triglycerides during a postprandial period that allowed ad libitum feeding, even though energy intake was increased as a result of the ad libitum feeding regime . In the present study, high glycaemic (GI) index CHO was fed post-exercise in EX-BAL, intended to restore muscle glycogen to CON values without supercompensation The hypertriglyceridemic effects of high GI diets are well known . This high GI refeeding in EX-BAL exerted its effects on large VLDL particle concentration only with no change in medium or small VLDL or any other lipoprotein particles compared to EX-DEF. Particle concentration changes in this TG-rich fraction have the greatest potential to influence total serum TG. It is unclear if low GI CHO or high fat feeding to maintain a CHO deficit while restoring energy balance, would have influenced the lipoprotein particle distribution similarly. It should be noted that medium VLDL-TG was lowered following acute exercise by nearly 50% even in the presence of high GI CHO feeding. However, there was insufficient statistical power to detect a difference in serum TG between CON and EX-BAL, as medium sized VLDL particles accounted for only ~12% of total circulating TG.
Skeletal muscle LPL activity was not different from CON in either exercise condition, despite the vigorous, exhausting and glycogen depleting nature of the exercise. This study provides evidence that LPL activity is not necessarily a response required to explain the influence of either exercise or post-exercise CHO refeeding on serum lipids and lipoproteins. Indeed a review of the available literature does not provide compelling evidence that acute exercise consistently increases LPL activity. Studies have found LPL activity to be increased [30-32] but also unchanged [33,34] in the early post-exercise period, increased  and unchanged  on the morning after exercise. Other studies have reported increases in LPL activity that are restricted to certain muscle fibre types , timepoints , genders  and apo E haplotypes . In this recent genetic study , exercise training actually reduced post-heparin LPL activity in the most common apo E haplotype, though this did not prevent a reduction in serum TG.
The results of the present study do not rule out a contributing influence of LPL on lipid and lipoprotein particles, especially under other conditions or types of subjects. Although mean LPL activity was unchanged, the changes in serum TG, VLDL-TG, VLDL size and large VLDL particle concentration between CON and EX-DEF were inversely correlated with the change in LPL activity, a phenomenon also observed in other similarly designed studies [11,38]. It appears that this association was driven by changes in large VLDL particles. A recent review  has described in more detail than possible here why LPL activity may possibly contribute, but not be a primary factor for TG lowering after exercise. Current research attention has in part begun focusing on the issues related to VLDL compositional changes to account for the effects of acute exercise on VLDL metabolism , with the secretion of fewer but TG-richer VLDL1 particles by the liver, potentially increasing interaction with LPL in the periphery. In the present study, large and medium VLDL particle concentrations were indeed lower in EX-DEF with small VLDL and IDL particle concentrations unchanged, though these reductions do not confirm such a secretional change. Of interest, the correlations suggest that exercise-induced increases in LPL activity may also have the potential to influence HDL and LDL metabolism and in particular to decrease the concentration of pro-atherogenic small LDL particles. The results of this study also highlight a role for skeletal muscle LPL activity in regulating serum TG and VLDL and HDL lipoprotein particles in the non-exercised control state. In the exercised state, few associations were evident, thus the importance of LPL appears to be overridden by other unknown factors.
In summary, this study has in much greater detail than hitherto characterized the influence of prolonged acute exercise on the VLDL particle profile. On the morning after prolonged exercise without postexericse CHO feeding, large VLDL are considerably reduced, in terms of particle concentration and the corresponding TG mass. However, this exercise effect on large VLDL, is only apparent when a negative CHO balance is maintained into the post-exercise period. In contrast, medium VLDL do not increase with CHO intake post-exercise. These effects are only obvious with this NMRS technique.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
MH, NMM and DJO’G were responsible for the research design. MH, TWZ, NMcC and BPC were involved in data collection and the biochemical analyses. MH, MTH, TWZ and NMM were involved in data analysis and manuscript writing. TWZ and MTH conceptualized the focus on the lipoprotein particle distribution, were responsible for the analytical NMRS strategy, and performed the skeletal muscle LPL assays. All authors approved the final submission.
We are grateful to the volunteers who gave of their time to take part in the study. This study was supported by Technological Sector Research Strand III funding to Waterford Institute of Technology to MH. TZW and MTH were supported in part by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant P01-HL-052490 and the Edward G. Schlieder Educational Foundation.
|Crouse SF,O’Brien BC,Grandjean PW,Lowe RC,Rohack JJ,Green JS,Effects of training and a single session of exercise on lipids and apolipoproteins in hypercholesterolemic menJ Appl PhysiolYear: 1997836201920289390976|
|Ferguson MA,Alderson NL,Trost SG,Essig DA,Burke JR,Durstine JL,Effects of four different single exercise sessions on lipids, lipoproteins, and lipoprotein lipaseJ Appl PhysiolYear: 1998853116911749729596|
|Gill JM,Herd SL,Tsetsonis NV,Hardman AE,Are the reductions in triacylglycerol and insulin levels after exercise related?Clin Sci (Lond)Year: 2002102222323110.1042/CS2001020411834142|
|Burton FL,Malkova D,Caslake MJ,Gill JM,Energy replacement attenuates the effects of prior moderate exercise on postprandial metabolism in overweight/obese menInt J Obes (Lond)Year: 200832348148910.1038/sj.ijo.080375417998903|
|Harrison M,O’Gorman DJ,McCaffrey N,Hamilton MT,Zderic TW,Carson BP,Moyna NM,Influence of acute exercise with and without carbohydrate replacement on postprandial lipid metabolismJ Appl PhysiolYear: 2009106394394910.1152/japplphysiol.91367.200819112157|
|Mora S,Otvos JD,Rosenson RS,Pradhan A,Buring JE,Ridker PM,Lipoprotein particle size and concentration by nuclear magnetic resonance and incident type 2 diabetes in womenDiabetesYear: 20105951153116010.2337/db09-111420185808|
|El Harchaoui K,Arsenault BJ,Franssen R,Despres JP,Hovingh GK,Stroes ES,Otvos JD,Wareham NJ,Kastelein JJ,Khaw KT,et al. High-density lipoprotein particle size and concentration and coronary riskAnn Intern MedYear: 20091502849319153411|
|Freedman DS,Otvos JD,Jeyarajah EJ,Barboriak JJ,Anderson AJ,Walker JA,Relation of lipoprotein subclasses as measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to coronary artery diseaseArterioscler Thromb Vasc BiolYear: 19981871046105310.1161/01.ATV.18.7.10469672064|
|Garvey WT,Kwon S,Zheng D,Shaughnessy S,Wallace P,Hutto A,Pugh K,Jenkins AJ,Klein RL,Liao Y,Effects of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes on lipoprotein subclass particle size and concentration determined by nuclear magnetic resonanceDiabetesYear: 200352245346212540621|
|Magkos F,Basal very low-density lipoprotein metabolism in response to exercise: mechanisms of hypotriacylglycerolemiaProg Lipid ResYear: 2009483–417119019275916|
|Herd SL,Kiens B,Boobis LH,Hardman AE,Moderate exercise, postprandial lipemia, and skeletal muscle lipoprotein lipase activityMetabolismYear: 200150775676210.1053/meta.2001.2419911436177|
|Kiens B,Richter EA,Utilization of skeletal muscle triacylglycerol during postexercise recovery in humansAm J PhysiolYear: 19982752 Pt 1E332E3379688636|
|Al-Shayji IA,Caslake MJ,Gill JM,Effects of moderate exercise on VLDL and Intralipid kinetics in overweight/obese middle-aged menAm J Physiol Endocrinol MetabYear: 20123023E349E35510.1152/ajpendo.00498.201122094472|
|Magkos F,Wright DC,Patterson BW,Mohammed BS,Mittendorfer B,Lipid metabolism response to a single, prolonged bout of endurance exercise in healthy young menAm J Physiol Endocrinol MetabYear: 20062902E355E36216219668|
|Peronnet F,Massicotte D,Table of nonprotein respiratory quotient: an updateCan J Sport SciYear: 199116123291645211|
|American College of Sports MedicineACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and PrescriptionYear: 20067Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia|
|Nilsson-Ehle P,Schotz MC,A stable, radioactive substrate emulsion for assay of lipoprotein lipaseJ Lipid ResYear: 19761755365419464|
|Hamilton MT,Areiqat E,Hamilton DG,Bey L,Plasma triglyceride metabolism in humans and rats during aging and physical inactivityInt J Sport Nutr Exerc MetabYear: 200111SupplS97S10411915936|
|Hamilton MT,Etienne J,McClure WC,Pavey BS,Holloway AK,Role of local contractile activity and muscle fiber type on LPL regulation during exerciseAm J PhysiolYear: 19982756 Pt 1E1016E10229843744|
|Zderic TW,Hamilton MT,Physical inactivity amplifies the sensitivity of skeletal muscle to the lipid-induced downregulation of lipoprotein lipase activityJ Appl PhysiolYear: 2006100124925710.1152/japplphysiol.00925.200516195388|
|Passonneau JV,Lauderdale VR,A comparison of three methods of glycogen measurement in tissuesAnal BiochemYear: 197460240541210.1016/0003-2697(74)90248-64844560|
|Festa A,Williams K,Hanley AJ,Otvos JD,Goff DC,Wagenknecht LE,Haffner SM,Nuclear magnetic resonance lipoprotein abnormalities in prediabetic subjects in the Insulin resistance atherosclerosis studyCirculationYear: 2005111253465347210.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.51207915983261|
|Gill JM,Al-Mamari A,Ferrell WR,Cleland SJ,Sattar N,Packard CJ,Petrie JR,Caslake MJ,Effects of a moderate exercise session on postprandial lipoproteins, apolipoproteins and lipoprotein remnants in middle-aged menAtherosclerosisYear: 20061851879610.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.06.00916024023|
|Redgrave TG,Carlson LA,Changes in plasma very low density and low density lipoprotein content, composition, and size after a fatty meal in normo- and hypertriglyceridemic manJ Lipid ResYear: 1979202217229220359|
|Gill JM,Brown JC,Bedford D,Wright DM,Cooney J,Hughes DA,Packard CJ,Caslake MJ,Hepatic production of VLDL1 but not VLDL2 is related to insulin resistance in normoglycaemic middle-aged subjectsAtherosclerosisYear: 20041761495610.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.04.02215306174|
|Gurr MI,Harwood JL,Frayn KN,Lipid Biochemistry: An IntroductionYear: 20025Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK|
|Newsom SA,Schenk S,Thomas KM,Harber MP,Knuth ND,Goldenberg N,Horowitz JF,Energy deficit after exercise augments lipid mobilization but does not contribute to the exercise-induced increase in insulin sensitivityJ Appl PhysiolYear: 2010108355456010.1152/japplphysiol.01106.200920044472|
|Farah NM,Malkova D,Gill JM,Effects of exercise on postprandial responses to ad libitum feeding in overweight menMed Sci Sports ExercYear: 201042112015202210.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0d18620386332|
|Hudgins LC,Hellerstein M,Seidman C,Neese R,Diakun J,Hirsch J,Human fatty acid synthesis is stimulated by a eucaloric low fat, high carbohydrate dietJ Clin InvestYear: 19969792081209110.1172/JCI1186458621798|
|Lithell H,Cedermark M,Froberg J,Tesch P,Karlsson J,Increase of lipoprotein-lipase activity in skeletal muscle during heavy exercise. Relation to epinephrine excretionMetabolismYear: 198130111130113410.1016/0026-0495(81)90059-77289885|
|Lithell H,Orlander J,Schele R,Sjodin B,Karlsson J,Changes in lipoprotein-lipase activity and lipid stores in human skeletal muscle with prolonged heavy exerciseActa Physiol ScandYear: 1979107325726110.1111/j.1748-1716.1979.tb06471.x539455|
|Taskinen MR,Nikkila EA,Effect of acute vigorous exercise on lipoprotein lipase activity of adipose tissue and skeletal muscle in physically active menArteryYear: 1980664714837002115|
|Kiens B,Lithell H,Lipoprotein metabolism influenced by training-induced changes in human skeletal muscleJ Clin InvestYear: 198983255856410.1172/JCI1139182643634|
|Lithell H,Hellsing K,Lundqvist G,Malmberg P,Lipoprotein-lipase activity of human skeletal-muscle and adipose tissue after intensive physical exerciseActa Physiol ScandYear: 1979105331231510.1111/j.1748-1716.1979.tb06346.x443062|
|Kiens B,Lithell H,Mikines KJ,Richter EA,Effects of insulin and exercise on muscle lipoprotein lipase activity in man and its relation to insulin actionJ Clin InvestYear: 19898441124112910.1172/JCI1142752677048|
|Perreault L,Lavely JM,Kittelson JM,Horton TJ,Gender differences in lipoprotein lipase activity after acute exerciseObes ResYear: 200412224124910.1038/oby.2004.3114981216|
|Seip RL,Zoeller RF,Angelopoulos TJ,Salonia J,Bilbie C,Moyna NM,Miles MP,Visich PS,Pescatello LS,Gordon PM,et al. Interactive effects of APOE haplotype, sex, and exercise on postheparin plasma lipase activitiesJ Appl PhysiolYear: 201111041021102810.1152/japplphysiol.00287.201021252218|
|Gill JM,Herd SL,Vora V,Hardman AE,Effects of a brisk walk on lipoprotein lipase activity and plasma triglyceride concentrations in the fasted and postprandial statesEur J Appl PhysiolYear: 200389218419010.1007/s00421-002-0788-912665983|
Fasting plasma lipoprotein particle profile in CON, EX-DEF and EX-BAL
|□ Total triglyceride (mg/dL)
||83.9 ± 12.6
||56.5 ± 6.9 *
||77.1 ± 5.2**
VLDL TG mass (mg/dl)
|□ Total VLDL-TG
||66.6 ± 9.2
||47.8 ± 5.6
||58.9 ± 3.8
|□ Large VLDL-TG (55–260 nm)
||39.3 ± 8.2
||24.8 ± 3.6 *
||35.3 ± 2.8**
|□ Large VLDL-TG (70–120 nm)
||29.3 ± 7.4
||15.5 ± 3.3 *
||25.6 ± 2.6**
|□ Medium VLDL-TG
||10.5 ± 1.0
||5.2 ± 2.3 *
||5.6 ± 1.3 *
|□ Small VLDL-TG
||16.8 ± 1.4
||17.8 ± 1.6
||18.1 ± 2.4
VLDL particle concentration (nmol/L)
|□ Total VLDL
||41.3 ± 3.4
||37.9 ± 3.5
||40.5 ± 3.5
|□ Large VLDL (55–260 nm)
||4.1 ± 0.8
||2.2 ± 0.5*
||3.5 ± 0.4**
|□ Medium VLDL
||7.5 ± 0.7
||3.7 ± 1.6*
||4.0 ± 0.9*
|□ Small VLDL
||29.7 ± 2.4
||32.0 ± 3.1
||33.0 ± 3.6
LDL particle concentration (nmol/L)
||698 ± 64
||702 ± 49
||682 ± 56
||205 ± 53
||235 ± 69
||175 ± 38
|All Small LDL
||299 ± 37
||297 ± 49
||312 ± 15
||194 ± 24
||170 ± 19
||195 ± 27
HDL particle concentration (μmol/L)
||23.9 ± 0.9
||24.3 ± 1.4
||23.9 ± 1.1
||2.2 ± 0.2
||2.5 ± 0.4
||2.1 ± 0.31
||7.4 ± 0.8
||7.7 ± 1.1
||6.9 ± 0.97
||14.3 ± 0.5
||14.0 ± 0.8
||14.9 ± 1.1
Mean Particle Size (nm)
||51.8 ± 1.8
||46.0 ± 1.9*
||50.9 ± 1.5**
||20.8 ± 0.2
||20.7 ± 0.2
||20.7 ± 0.1
|HDL||9.0 ± 0.1||9.1 ± 0.1||9.0 ± 0.2|
Values are mean ± SEM; n = 8. CON, non-exercised control condition. EX-DEF, morning after prolonged exercise without carbohydrate replacement and thus during carbohydrate deficit; EX-BAL, morning after prolonged exercise with sufficient carbohydrate replacement to restore carbohydrate and energy balance following exercise. Large, medium and small VLDL are defined as 55 – 260 nm, 43 – 55 nm and 29 – 43 nm diameters respectively with data also presented for 70 – 120 nm range (subset of large). IDL, large LDL and small LDL are defined as 23 – 27 nm, 21.2 – 23 nm and 18 – 21.2 nm diameters, respectively. Large HDL, medium HDL and small HDL are defined as 8.8 - 13 nm, 8.2 – 8.8 nm and 7.3 – 8.2 nm diameters respectively. Differences assessed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by LSD post-hoc. *p < 0.05 vs CON; **p < 0.05 compared to EX-DEF; □ data log-transformed prior to statistical analysis.
Association of skeletal muscle lipoprotein lipase activity with lipid and lipoprotein particles in CON, EX-DEF and EX-BAL
|Lipid /Lipoprotein parameters||CON||EX-DEF||EX-BAL|
|Serum TG (mg/dL) (biochemical)
|Total VLDL particles (nmol/L)
|Large VLDL particles (nmol/L)
|Medium VLDL particles (nmol/L)
|Small VLDL particles (nmol/L)
|IDL particles (nmol/L)
|LDL particles (nmol/L)
|Small LDL particles (nmol/L)
|HDL particles (μmol/L)
|Large HDL particles (nmol/L)
|Mean VLDL size (nm)
|Mean HDL size (nm)
|Mean LDL size (nm)||+0.30||+0.11||−0.16|
*p < 0.05; for definitions see Table 1.
Keywords: Exercise, Lipoprotein lipase, Very low density lipoprotein, Triglyceride, Lipoprotein size, Energy deficit.
Previous Document: Coculture with hematopoietic stem cells protects cardiomyocytes against apoptosis via paracrine acti...
Next Document: Cell division and density of symbiotic Chlorella variabilis of the ciliate Paramecium bursaria is co...