| Limitations of skin protection. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 17312367 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Skin protection products and gloves are essential constituents of personal protective equipment at workplaces, which can be used in a complementary way, each offering particular benefits and disadvantages. In many workplace situations, both measures are being used either in an alternating or in a combined manner, typically in professions with exposures to mild irritants and a high wet-work load, such as hairdressers, healthcare workers or employees in the food-processing industry. Skin protection creams can be used to reduce unnecessarily long glove usage in order to reduce occlusion-related effects on the skin barrier. Whenever rotating machines are used, these products are the only option due to safety regulations. However, some particular requirements can be postulated for skin-protective products claimed especially to be used in combination with gloves. Reduction of glove-induced perspiration, of stratum corneum swelling, and postocclusive barrier impairment are intended attributes of such products, which have been already successfully implemented in some commercially available products. On the other hand it has to be proven that the ingredients do not interfere with the glove material, neither in the way of degrading the material, thus making it permeable for harmful substances, nor by enhancing the potential release of rubber allergens. Examples out of the literature are reviewed showing that skin products can exhibit unpredictable effects on the allergen release of rubber materials, if not thoroughly tested for this purpose beforehand. Some raw materials should be avoided in protection products, though they are of established value when used in afterwork emollients to accelerate barrier recovery. Usage of moisturizers, in contrast to special barrier products, at the workplace together or even under gloves is therefore judged critically, although selected products showed beneficial effects in particular experimental settings. Another future option is the implementation of 'active gloves' that are intended to gradually release ingredients that help to strengthen and preserve skin barrier integrity. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Sibylle Schliemann |
Related Documents
:
|
11895627 - Biotechnology and food allergy. 19501767 - Consumer appeal of nutrition and health claims in three existing product concepts. 17910607 - Reactions of the no redox forms no+, *no and hno (protonated no-) with the melatonin me... 839027 - Quantity food production labor time. 7410757 - Effect of microwave heating in cook/chill foodservice systems. some data on temperature... 15839567 - Bioavailability of polybrominated diphenyl ether flame retardants in biosolids and spik... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Review |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Current problems in dermatology Volume: 34 ISSN: 1421-5721 ISO Abbreviation: Curr. Probl. Dermatol. Publication Date: 2007 |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2007-02-21 Completed Date: 2008-09-25 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 0147371 Medline TA: Curr Probl Dermatol Country: Switzerland |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 171-7 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany. Schliemann@derma.uni-jena.de |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Combined Modality Therapy
/
adverse effects Dermatologic Agents / adverse effects Gloves, Protective / adverse effects Humans Patient Compliance Skin Diseases / etiology, prevention & control* Treatment Failure |
| Chemical | |
Reg. No./Substance:
|
0/Dermatologic Agents |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Skin protection training. The route to practical applications.
Next Document: Donepezil in Alzheimer's disease: what to expect after 3 years of treatment in a routine clinical se...