Document Detail


Limitations of the Knee Society Score in evaluating outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20962195     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the results of revision total knee arthroplasty have been determined with use of surgeon-based measures such as the Knee Society rating system. Recently, outcome and quality-of-life measures have shifted toward a greater emphasis on patient-based evaluation. The aim of our study was to determine the validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society rating system compared with the Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and a four-question 4-point Likert scale satisfaction questionnaire following revision total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: A total of 152 patients underwent revision total knee arthroplasty at our institution, between August 2003 and January 2007, and had a two-year follow-up evaluation after revision surgery. The SF-36, WOMAC, Knee Society rating system, and satisfaction scores were completed preoperatively and postoperatively. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the degree of correlation for each outcome scale. The SF-36, WOMAC, and patient satisfaction were correlated with the Knee Society rating system. RESULTS: Both before and after surgery, the correlation among items of the Knee Society rating system displayed low to negligible levels of association. The Knee Society rating system pain score showed modest levels of convergent construct validity with the WOMAC and SF-36. However, the Knee Society functional score displayed negligible to low correlation with its WOMAC functional counterpart preoperatively. The Knee Society pain and functional scores, respectively, showed marked and moderate association with satisfaction. The change in the Knee Society pain and functional scores had moderate association with the SF-36 and WOMAC counterparts, except low correlation was displayed between the pain scores for the Knee Society rating system and the SF-36. The Knee Society rating system pain score was found to be the most responsive of the measures with a standardized response mean of 1.6, whereas the Knee Society rating system functional score was found to be the least responsive at 0.7. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is no so-called gold standard that optimally reflects the status of the knee, as well as the patient, prior to and following revision total knee arthroplasty. Ideally, numerous assessment scales should be administered to the patient in order to accurately reflect the patient characteristics for the purpose of academic study, but from a practical standpoint, this may not be feasible. We encourage further research and development of a simple and concise standardized questionnaire for use before and after revision total knee arthroplasty.
Authors:
Elie Ghanem; Ian Pawasarat; Adam Lindsay; Lauren May; Khalid Azzam; Ashish Joshi; Javad Parvizi
Related Documents :
19968215 - Delaying knee replacement and implications on early postoperative outcomes: a pilot study.
16652425 - Longterm effects of intraarticular hyaluronan on synovial fluid in osteoarthritis of th...
11679605 - Poor outcomes of isolated tibial insert exchange and arthrolysis for the management of ...
20819425 - Mini-subvastus versus a standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, ra...
9579865 - Is the ancillary chemotherapy approach of any value in the treatment of infratentorial ...
20859665 - Primary immunodeficiencies: a 27-year review at a tertiary paediatric hospital in cape ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume     Volume:  92     ISSN:  1535-1386     ISO Abbreviation:  J Bone Joint Surg Am     Publication Date:  2010 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-10-21     Completed Date:  2010-11-05     Revised Date:  2010-11-16    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0014030     Medline TA:  J Bone Joint Surg Am     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2445-51     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Joint Reconstructive Research, The Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 925 Chestnut Street, 2nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee*
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Osteoarthritis, Knee / surgery
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)*
Patient Satisfaction
Questionnaires
Reoperation

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers.
Next Document:  Effect of insurance status on the rate of surgery following a meniscal tear.