|Level of radiographic damage and radiographic progression are determinants of physical function: a longitudinal analysis of the TEMPO trial.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 18203764 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|BACKGROUND: Many studies have examined the relationship between long-term radiographic damage and physical function. However, it is not known if short-term radiographic progression is also associated with physical function. Aim: To investigate the longitudinal relationship between physical function and both the level of radiographic damage and the radiographic progression rate in patients with early or advanced active rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: The database for the 2-year Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate with Radiographic Patient Outcomes (TEMPO) was used for this study. Physical function was measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score at baseline, 6 months and 1 and 2 years. Radiographs of the hands and feet, taken at the same time points, were scored by the van der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score (TSS). The HAQ score was modelled using generalised mixed linear modelling by TSS or progression in TSS (interval 0-1 year and 1-2 years) adjusted for age, sex, treatment and disease activity. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, sex and disease activity, both TSS and the change in TSS (progression rate) were significant determinants of the HAQ score. When radiographic progression was divided into four categories (negative, zero, minor and greater progression), results showed that HAQ scores tended to be higher with a higher rate of progression. Patients with negative progression scores had lower HAQ scores than patients with positive progression scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with greater radiographic damage, and those with recent radiographic progression, have a higher degree of disability.|
|D van der Heijde; R Landewé; R van Vollenhoven; S Fatenejad; L Klareskog|
Related Documents :
|10952744 - A study of the health assessment questionnaire to evaluate functional status in polymya...
7911664 - Treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis with a chimeric anti-cd4 monoclonal antibo...
23562254 - Wound drainage in primary knee arthroplasty - a prospective randomized study.
19451504 - Long-term successful adalimumab therapy in severe hidradenitis suppurativa.
3052684 - Kock pouch urinary diversion: follow-up by ultrasound.
16557434 - Multicenter phase ii study of antimicrobial prophylaxis in low-risk patients undergoing...
|Type: Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2008-01-18|
|Title: Annals of the rheumatic diseases Volume: 67 ISSN: 1468-2060 ISO Abbreviation: Ann. Rheum. Dis. Publication Date: 2008 Sep|
|Created Date: 2008-08-13 Completed Date: 2008-10-28 Revised Date: 2009-11-18|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 0372355 Medline TA: Ann Rheum Dis Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 1267-70 Citation Subset: IM|
|Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 CC Leiden, The Netherlands. email@example.com|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Arthritis, Rheumatoid / drug therapy, physiopathology, radiography*
Drug Therapy, Combination
Foot Joints / radiography
Hand Joints / radiography
Immunoglobulin G / therapeutic use
Methotrexate / therapeutic use
Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor / therapeutic use
|0/Antirheumatic Agents; 0/Immunoglobulin G; 0/Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor; 185243-69-0/TNFR-Fc fusion protein; 59-05-2/Methotrexate|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Ann Rheum Dis
Journal ID (publisher-id): ard
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR
? van der Heijde et al 2008
Accepted Day: 20 Month: 12 Year: 2007
collection publication date: Year: 2008
Print publication date: Month: 9 Year: 2008
Electronic publication date: Day: 18 Month: 1 Year: 2008
pmc-release publication date: Day: 18 Month: 1 Year: 2008
Volume: 67 Issue: 9
First Page: 1267 Last Page: 1270
PubMed Id: 18203764
Publisher Id: ar81331
|Level of radiographic damage and radiographic progression are determinants of physical function: a longitudinal analysis of the TEMPO trial Alternate Title:Extended report|
|D van der Heijde1|
|R van Vollenhoven3|
1Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
2University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands
3Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
4Wyeth Research, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
|Correspondence: Professor D van der Heijde, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 CC Leiden, The Netherlands; firstname.lastname@example.org
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects almost 1% of the adult population.1 Affected subjects experience considerable morbidity, including a rapid loss of function,2, 3 joint destruction, permanent deformity and reduced life expectancy.4, 5 Based on published guidelines,6, 7 treatment of RA should focus on preserving function, preventing or controlling joint damage and achieving remission of disease activity.
Progressive radiographic damage and deterioration in physical function occur in patients with RA who do not receive timely effective treatment. Several long-term prospective studies have looked at the relationship between radiographic damage and physical function in patients with RA.8?10 A prospective 6-year follow-up study by Kuper et al10 showed that large joint damage occurs early in the disease, with at least 20% of patients having damage in at least one joint within 1 year of disease onset and 50% of patients having some damage within 6 years of disease onset. Radiographic changes were significantly related to damage in the hands and feet, the physical disability index and cumulative disease activity.10 In a review of the links between joint damage and disability in patients with RA, Scott et al reported that joint damage progresses continuously over the first 20 years of RA and that this damage accounts for 25% of the disability seen in patients.9 Radiographic damage is thus clearly a major determinant of long-term physical function in patients with established RA.
Although studies have shown that a relationship between physical function and radiographic damage exists, they have mostly examined this association looking at radiographic damage over the long term. It is not known whether progression of radiographic damage over short periods is associated with immediate impairment in physical function. This question is particularly relevant today because of the availability of powerful treatments that can prevent radiographic progression if started early enough. For example, in clinical trials, etanercept, either alone or in combination with methotrexate, has been shown to reduce radiographic progression in patients with recent and long-term RA.11?13
Our study used data from the Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate with Radiographic Patient Outcomes (TEMPO),11, 14 to investigate the longitudinal relationship between physical function and both level of radiographic damage and radiographic progression over a 2-year period, in a cohort of patients with early or advanced active RA.
TEMPO was a multicentre, double-blind study that compared the effect of etanercept plus methotrexate versus etanercept alone versus methotrexate alone in 686 patients with active RA of 6 months to 20 years? duration.11, 14 Details of this trial are published elsewhere.11, 14?16
All patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: etanercept (25 mg twice-weekly subcutaneous doses), methotrexate (7.5?20 mg weekly oral doses) or combination therapy with etanercept and methotrexate.
Physical function was measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at baseline and at protocol-specified intervals throughout the study; scores at baseline and 1 and 2 years were used in the analysis. The HAQ is scored on a scale of 0?3, with higher scores indicating increased disability.
Radiographs of the hands, wrists and forefeet were taken at baseline, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Digitised images were scored by two readers, using the van der Heijde-modified Sharp method.17 Radiographic progression was determined for each interval by subtracting status scores of two time points. Radiographic progression was divided into four categories (negative, <0; zero, 0?1; minor, 1?5; and greater progression, >5) for comparisons with HAQ scores. The radiographic population consisted of patients who had an acceptable baseline and at least one acceptable post-baseline film.
To control for within-patient correlation, generalised mixed linear modelling was used to model the dependent variable HAQ score by the absolute Sharp score (damage score) or the interval change in Sharp score, with age, sex, disease duration, treatment, Disease Activity Score (DAS) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as covariates. If interval change in Sharp score was entered as an independent variable, the HAQ score at the end of the interval was chosen as the dependent variable in the model and the HAQ score at baseline was omitted. A random intercept and a compound symmetry covariance structure seemed to best fit the data. Results are expressed as estimated marginal means. In separate analyses, the interaction of disease duration and (change in) Sharp score with respect to HAQ score was tested.
Of the 686 randomly assigned patients, 622 (91%) had a baseline and at least one follow-up film and were included in the radiographic analysis. No statistically significant differences were found among the three treatment groups in baseline demographic and disease characteristics. Patients included in the analysis were predominantly women (76.5%), with mean disease duration of 6.35 years, mean HAQ score of 1.72 and mean total Sharp score (TSS) of 33.0 at baseline.
In the linear mixed model, which was applied here in order to aggregate data of baseline, year 1 and year 2 data under simultaneous adjustment for within-patient correlation, the TSS was significantly positively associated with the HAQ score independently of the DAS (table 1). A number of additional variables were independently associated with the HAQ score, including age (positive correlation), sex (women had higher HAQ scores) and the DAS (positive correlation).
The HAQ score is primarily determined by disease activity. In the context of a clinical trial, it is expected that the disease activity would show important variation that would easily obscure a contributory and independent association with radiographic damage or progression. We first investigated the relationship between the DAS and the HAQ score. After adjustment for age and sex, the relationship between DAS and the HAQ score was almost linear (fig 1). This linear relationship justifies why in every subsequent analysis to determine the contribution of radiographic damage to explaining physical function we have adjusted for the known relationship between the DAS and the HAQ score.
To visualise the adjusted relationship between the HAQ score and the Sharp score, Sharp scores were divided into six categories of 10 Sharp units each and estimated marginal means were calculated. Figure 2 shows estimated marginal means of the fitted model (mean HAQ scores adjusted for age, sex, DAS, treatment and time) for each category of 10 Sharp units and clearly points to an increasing trend. A separate analysis, in which the Sharp score was replaced by the change in Sharp score, also indicated that the change in Sharp score (interval progression; Sharp units per year) was significantly and independently associated with the HAQ score (p?=?0.001; table 2). This implies that patients who show joint damage progression have worse physical function, independent of disease activity and the type of treatment they use, although the effects were small.
Figure 3 shows the effect of changes in radiographic damage on physical function, with progression of radiographic damage stratified into four categories (negative, zero, minor and greater progression). HAQ scores tended to increase with increasing radiographic progression, although the differences were small and probably not clinically meaningful. Figure 3 also suggests that patients with negative progression scores have lower HAQ scores than patients with positive progression scores, but this effect was not statistically significant.
In an attempt to determine whether the documented association between the Sharp score and the HAQ score, as well as the association between the change in Sharp score and HAQ score, was dependent on disease duration, we tested the following interactions: Sharp score and disease duration and change in Sharp score and disease duration, with disease duration dichotomised at a cut-off level of 3 years, with respect to explaining variation in HAQ score. Both interactions were not statistically significant (results not shown)
This analysis provides further evidence for the longitudinal relationship between radiographic damage and physical function. As shown, progression of radiographic damage over short periods of time is associated with worse physical function, which is independent of the effects of inflammatory disease activity (DAS). In addition, patients who had negative radiographic progression tended to have better physical function than patients with zero or low positive progression scores. This finding gains importance in the light of the low radiographic progression rates that were found in the 2-year TEMPO trial.14 Despite these low progression rates, this (sensitive) longitudinal analysis suggests that any type of radiographic progression has repercussions for physical functioning. It may be argued that DAS and CRP inappropriately reflect disease activity and that the proposed association between radiographic progression and physical function would disappear if a variable that better reflects inflammatory activity were used. This is, however, highly unlikely. The contribution of radiographic progression to the HAQ score was similarly high before and after adjustment for DAS and CRP, so that both effects are truly separated (data not shown).
In a 10-year longitudinal study,18 we have previously observed that radiographic damage and disease activity independently contribute to changes in physical function in RA regardless of disease duration. Others have reported the longitudinal relationship between joint damage and physical function after adjustment for disease activity.19 In that particular study, performed on an inception cohort of patients with RA followed up for many years while receiving standard conventional antirheumatic treatment, the main driver of physical function was determined to be disease activity. But Welsing et al also found a significant contribution of joint damage (measured by van der Heijde?s modification of the Sharp score) to explain the variation in physical function.19
There are important differences between these previous studies18, 19 and our current study: First, we analysed a trial population using highly effective treatments. In our study, radiographic progression was minimal, although the level of baseline damage was, on average, substantial. Apart from that, the active trial treatment resulted in very low levels of disease activity in the majority of the trial population. Even with such a low level of variation in the determinants of function (disease activity and radiographic damage/progression) a relationship between radiographic damage progression and the HAQ score was suggested by this analysis. Second, in our study, we investigated the contribution of radiographic progression itself, rather than radiographic damage at any particular time point. Our analysis suggests that both the level of damage, and the progression rate, although very low, contributed to variation in physical function. Third, our observations were made in a 2-year follow-up study, whereas the previous studies18, 19 investigated function over a period of 9?12 years, in which deterioration of physical function is likely to be far more substantial. Taken together, however, the longitudinal studies provide evidence that physical function in patients with RA is determined not only by disease activity but also by radiographic damage and the rate at which radiographic damage increases over time. Fluctuations in the progression rate and in the disease activity cause demonstrable effects on physical function within very short time intervals. These data add to the ever-growing evidence that it is important not only to suppress disease activity but also to halt radiographic progression to maintain physical function.
It is not a coincidence that studies using longitudinal data analyses are consistent with the existence of a relationship between radiographic damage and physical function. It has been hypothesised that this relationship exists, but it has turned out to be rather difficult to confirm it statistically in studies using cross-sectional analytical approaches.20, 21 A longitudinal data analysis provides far more statistical power because it uses all available data of a prospectively followed cohort in an aggregated manner, while adjusting for spurious intra-patient correlation. Apart from that, longitudinal data analysis provides insight into how changes in disease activity and radiographic progression?for example, as a result of effective treatments, influence physical function.
Physical function is often considered to be a rather static outcome. However, recent experience from randomised clinical trials evaluating highly effective treatments has shown that impairment of physical function in patients with RA is reversible to some extent. In a recent analysis, Aletaha et al reported that the irreversible part of the HAQ score was between 0% and 33%, increasing with the duration of RA.22 We hypothesise that this irreversible impairment is caused by structural damage, while the reversible impairment is primarily inflammation. If true, early effective intervention to limit structural damage may be helpful in decreasing irreversible physical impairment.
Many studies support the use of early treatment of RA. Landew? et al showed that the best way to prevent radiographic damage is to start treatment before such damage has occurred.23 If this is not possible, aggressive treatment should be started within 12?24 months after the diagnosis of RA to limit radiographic progression over time.23 Anderson et al showed that the rate of radiological progression is set during the early stages of RA and suggested resetting this progression rate through pharmacological treatment as soon as possible after the disease is recognised.24 Other studies support the finding that radiographic damage occurs early in the onset of RA and progresses throughout the disease.2, 3, 25?27 A recent meta-analysis showed that starting treatment early has a long-term benefit on inhibition of structural damage.28 This analysis demonstrated that the association between radiographic progression and physical function was similarly important in relatively early RA (disease duration ?3 years) as compared with more advanced RA (disease duration >3 years), which emphasises the importance of minimising radiographic progression at all stages of the disease.
Rheumatologists frequently question whether the small differences in radiographic progression between trial arms are clinically meaningful. This analysis supports the view that subtle differences in radiographic progression have a measurable impact on physical function, although most probably at a level that is not truly clinically meaningful for the patient over a relatively short period. The question, however, is how physical function would be influenced if mild progression were allowed for years and years, using the argument that small fluctuations are not clinically meaningful.
This analysis suggests that in patients with RA, greater radiographic damage and recent radiographic progression correlate with a higher degree of disability, after adjustment for age, sex, disease duration and disease activity.
Funding: Professional writing support was funded by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals
Competing interests: DvdH, RL and LK have received consulting fees from Wyeth, manufacturer of etanercept. RvV has declared no competing interests. SF is an employee and stockholder of Wyeth.
Ethics approval: Ethics committee approval obtained.
We thank Laini Dubach and Ruth Pereira for professional writing support.
|1.||Silman A J,Hochberg M C, eds. Epidemiology of the rheumatic diseasesNew York, NY: Oxford University Press, Year: 1993|
|2.||Drossaers-Bakker KW,de Buck M,van Zeben D,Zwinderman AH,Breedveld FC,Hazes JM. Long-term course and outcome of functional capacity in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of disease activity and radiologic damage over time.Arthritis RheumYear: 1999;42:1854?6010513799|
|3.||Eberhardt KB,Fex E. Functional impairment and disability in early rheumatoid arthritis?development over 5 years.J RheumatolYear: 1995;22:1037?427674227|
|4.||Pincus T,Sokka T,Wolfe F. Premature mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evolving concepts [comment].Arthritis RheumYear: 2001;44:1234?611407680|
|5.||Pincus T,Callahan LF. The ?side effects? of rheumatoid arthritis: joint destruction, disability and early mortality.Br J RheumatolYear: 1993;32(Suppl 1):28?378448634|
|6.||Furst DE,Breedveld FC,Kalden JR,Smolen JS,Antoni CE,Bijlsma JW,et al. Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other rheumatic diseases (May 2002).Ann Rheum DisYear: 2002;61(Suppl 2):ii2?712379612|
|7.||American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Rheumatoid Arthritis GuidelinesGuidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 update.Arthritis RheumYear: 2002;46:328?4611840435|
|8.||Drossaers-Bakker KW,Zwinderman AH,Vlieland TP,Van Zeben D,Vos K,Breedveld FC,et al. Long-term outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: a simple algorithm of baseline parameters can predict radiographic damage, disability, and disease course at 12-year followup.Arthritis RheumYear: 2002;47:383?9012209484|
|9.||Scott DL,Pugner K,Kaarela K,Doyle DV,Woolf A,Holmes J,et al. The link between joint damage and disability in rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford)Year: 2000;39:122?3210725061|
|10.||Kuper HH,van Leeuwen MA,van Riel PL,Prevoo ML,Houtman PM,Lolkema WF,et al. Radiographic damage in large joints in early rheumatoid arthritis: relationship with radiographic damage in hands and feet, disease activity, and physical disability.Br J RheumatolYear: 1997;36:855?609291854|
|11.||Klareskog L,van der Heijde D,de Jager JP,Gough A,Kalden J,Malaise M,et al. Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.LancetYear: 2004;363:675?8115001324|
|12.||Genovese MC,Bathon JM,Fleischmann RM,Moreland LW,Martin RW,Whitmore JB,et al. Longterm safety, efficacy, and radiographic outcome with etanercept treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.J RheumatolYear: 2005;32:1232?4215996057|
|13.||Bathon JM,Martin RW,Fleischmann RM,Tesser JR,Schiff MH,Keystone EC,et al. A comparison of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis[comment][erratum appears in N Engl J Med 2001;344:240].N Engl J MedYear: 2000;343:1586?9311096165|
|14.||van der Heijde D,Klareskog L,Rodriguez-Valverde V,Codreanu C,Bolosiu H,Melo-Gomes J,et al. Comparison of etanercept and methotrexate, alone and combined, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: two-year clinical and radiographic results from the TEMPO study, a double-blind, randomized trial.Arthritis RheumYear: 2006;54:1063?7416572441|
|15.||van der Heijde D,Klareskog L,Singh A,Tornero J,Melo-Gomes J,Codreanu C,et al. Patient reported outcomes in a trial of combination therapy with etanercept and methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis: the TEMPO trial.Ann Rheum DisYear: 2006;65:328?3416079172|
|16.||van der Heijde D,Klareskog L,Landew? R,Bruyn GA,Cantagrel A,Durez P,et al. Disease remission and sustained halting of radiographic progression with combination etanercept and methotrexate inpatients with rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis RheumYear: 2007;56:3928?3918050208|
|17.||van der Heijde DM,van Leeuwen MA,van Riel PL,van de Putte LB. Radiographic progression on radiographs of hands and feet during the first 3 years of rheumatoid arthritis measured according to Sharp?s method (van der Heijde modification).J RheumatolYear: 1995;22:1792?68523365|
|18.||?degard S,Landewe R,van der Heijde D,Kvien TK,Mowinckel P,Uhlig T. Association of early radiographic damage with impaired physical function in rheumatoid arthritis: a ten-year, longitudinal observational study in 238 patients.Arthritis RheumYear: 2006;54:68?7516385497|
|19.||Welsing PM,van Gestel AM,Swinkels HL,Kiemeney LA,van Riel PL. The relationship between disease activity, joint destruction, and functional capacity over the course of rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis RheumYear: 2001;44:2009?1711592361|
|20.||Scott DL,Smith C,Kingsley G. Joint damage and disability in rheumatoid arthritis: an updated systematic review.Clin Exp RheumatolYear: 2003;21(Suppl 31):S20?714969046|
|21.||Hazes JM. Determinants of physical function in rheumatoid arthritis: association with the disease process.Rheumatology (Oxford)Year: 2003;42(Suppl 2):ii17?2112817091|
|22.||Aletaha D,Smolen J,Ward MM. Measuring function in rheumatoid arthritis: Identifying reversible and irreversible components.Arthritis RheumYear: 2006;54:2784?9216947781|
|23.||Landew? RB,Boers M,Verhoeven AC,Westhovens R,van de Laar MA,Markusse HM,et al. COBRA combination therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: long-term structural benefits of a brief intervention.[see comment].Arthritis RheumYear: 2002;46:347?5611840436|
|24.||Anderson JJ,Wells G,Verhoeven AC,Felson DT. Factors predicting response to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: the importance of disease duration.Arthritis RheumYear: 2000;43:22?910643696|
|25.||Fries JF,Spitz P,Kraines RG,Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis.Arthritis RheumYear: 1980;23:137?457362664|
|26.||Plant MJ,Jones PW,Saklatvala J,Ollier WE,Dawes PT. Patterns of radiological progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: results of an 8 year prospective study.J RheumatolYear: 1998;25:417?269517757|
|27.||Kaarela K,Kautiainen H. Continuous progression of radiological destruction in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis.J RheumatolYear: 1997;24:1285?79228126|
|28.||Finckh A,Liang MH,van Herckenrode CM,de Pablo P. Long-term impact of early treatment on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.Arthritis RheumYear: 2006;55:864?7217139662|
|Parameter||Regression coefficient||p Value||95% CI of the regression coefficient|
|Lower bound||Upper bound|
|Disease duration (years)||0.0059||0.174||?0.0026||0.0143|
|Sharp score (Sharp units)||0.0019||<0.001||0.0011||0.0027|
nt101*Dependent variable: HAQ.
nt102CRP, C-reactive protein.
|Parameter||Regression coefficient||p Value||95% CI of the regression coefficient|
|Lower bound||Upper bound|
|Disease duration (years)||0.0113||0.057||?0.0015||0.0241|
|Change in Sharp score (Sharp units/year)||0.0088640||0.001||0.0035||0.0143|
nt103*Dependent variable: HAQ
Previous Document: Sclerosing skin disorders in association with multiple sclerosis. Coincidence, underlying autoimmune...
Next Document: Use of the right brachio-femoral wire approach to manage a thoracic aortic aneurysm in an extremely ...