Document Detail


Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  3745837     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The controversy over nontreatment of handicapped newborns arises in a context of criminal and civil law, against which the current controversy has unfolded. This article examines the legal setting and background under traditional criminal and civil law concepts of nontreatment of handicapped newborns. It focuses on substantive principles of law, showing that nontreatment would be legally permitted when treatment could not be reasonably said to be in the interest of the patient involved, and that nontreatment could be considered criminal where treatment would serve patient interests. It then relates this analysis to procedural issues and the federal Baby Doe legislation and regulations that have recently emerged.
Robertson examines the substantive criminal and civil legal principles that may be applied in considerations of nontreatment of handicapped newborns. He analyses several court decisions that illustrate the extent of parental authority; the grounds for state intervention; the physician's legal obligations to the child; and the legal liability of hospitals, health personnel, and parents for nontreatment. The author accepts as the operative principle a patient-centered approach in which, for some infants, withholding treatment may be in the child's best interests. Robertson holds that, although the final Baby Doe regulations begin to recognize this principle, they do not recognize the extent to which nontreatment may be consonant with the infant's interests. He urges establishment of criteria for nontreatment and definition of the proper roles of physicians, parents, hospitals, infant care review committees, and courts in deciding whether these criteria are met.
Authors:
J A Robertson
Related Documents :
8728257 - The ethics of infant dialysis.
20558167 - The cross-generation transmission of oxytocin in humans.
2307037 - American conceptions of infant development from 1955 to 1984: what the experts are tell...
22403447 - Acquisition of social referencing via discrimination training in infants.
24190757 - Body growth and brain development in premature babies: an mri study.
10074987 - Maternal magnesium sulfate and the development of neonatal periventricular leucomalacia...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of health politics, policy and law     Volume:  11     ISSN:  0361-6878     ISO Abbreviation:  J Health Polit Policy Law     Publication Date:  1986  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1986-10-23     Completed Date:  1986-10-23     Revised Date:  2004-11-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7609331     Medline TA:  J Health Polit Policy Law     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  215-30     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Abnormalities, Multiple*
Contracts
Ethics Committees, Clinical
Ethics, Medical*
Euthanasia*
Euthanasia, Passive*
Federal Government
Government Regulation
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Judicial Role
Liability, Legal
Patient Advocacy / legislation & jurisprudence*
Patient Selection
Risk Assessment
Stress, Psychological
United States
Withholding Treatment*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Survival at what cost? Origins and effects of the modern controversy on treating severely handicappe...
Next Document:  Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapp...