Document Detail


Learning styles of first-year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students: A cross-sectional survey utilising the Kolb Learning Style Inventory.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21889237     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
It is important that educators understand their students' learning styles. In this study we investigate the learning styles of first-year undergraduate nursing and midwifery university students and whether these learning styles are influenced by student demographic characteristics. A cross-sectional survey including demographic questions and the Kolb Learning Style Inventory was utilised. There was a 78% response rate (n=345). The majority of first-year students investigated in this study were divergers (29.5%), followed by assimilators (28.8%), accommodators (23.9%) and convergers (17.9%). Female students had a higher reflective observation (RO) score than male students (p=0.0078). Those with English as first language showed a higher active experimentation score (p=0.0543) and a lower concrete experience (CE) score (p=0.0038). Australian citizens and permanent residents had a higher RO score (p=0.0560) and a lower CE score (p=0.0100) than migrants and international students. Nursing/arts students had a higher abstract conceptualisation (AC) score than nursing students (p=0.0013). Students enrolled in 4-5 subject units had a higher AC score than those enrolled in 1-2 units (p=0.0244). Nursing and midwifery students are mainly of the diverger and assimilating learning styles. Some student demographic characteristics show a significant influence on learning styles. This study has teaching and research implications.
Authors:
Angelo D'Amore; Santhamma James; Eleanor K L Mitchell
Related Documents :
16423117 - Impact of instructional practices on student satisfaction with attendings' teaching in ...
3772597 - Enhancing learning during a clinical clerkship: the value of a structured curriculum.
18444197 - Evaluation, grading, and use of the rime vocabulary on internal medicine clerkships: re...
21923007 - The impact of a simulation lab experiencefor nursing students.
16194247 - Learner-control vs. program-control instructional multimedia: a comparison of two inter...
267117 - Faculty evaluation: review of the literature most pertinent to dental education.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-9-1
Journal Detail:
Title:  Nurse education today     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1532-2793     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-9-5     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8511379     Medline TA:  Nurse Educ Today     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
School of Arts and Sciences, Victoria, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Australia; Department of Rural and Indigenous Health, School of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Synthesis, stereochemistry and SAR of a series of minodronate analogues as RGGT inhibitors.
Next Document:  Estimating and predicting chemical potentials, distributions, speciation modes and mobilities of rad...