Document Detail


Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23135590     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: : The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery has not been conclusively analyzed. No reliable framework for case selection during training is available.
OBJECTIVE: : The aim of this study was to analyze thelength of the learning curve of laparoscopic colorectal surgeons and to recommend a case selectionframework at the early stage of independent practice.
DATA SOURCES: : Medline (1988-2010, October week 4) and Embase (1988-2010) were used for the literature review, databases were retrieved from the authors, and expert opinion was surveyed.
STUDY SELECTION: : Studies describing the learning curve of laparoscopic or laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery were selected.
INTERVENTION: : No interventions were performed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: : Learning curves were analyzed by using risk-adjusted, bootstrapped cumulative sum curves. Conversions and complications were independent variables in a multilevel random-effects regression model. Recommendations are based on analysis of ORs and a structured expert opinion gauging process.
RESULTS: : Twenty-three studies were identified, showing great disparity on the length of the learning curve. Seven studies, representing 4852 cases (19 surgeons), were analyzed. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts demonstrated the length of the learning curves to be 152 cases for conversions, 143 for complications, 96 for operating time, 87 for blood loss, and 103 for length of stay. Body mass index and pelvic dissection (rectum), especially in male patients, independently increased the risk of complication and conversion. The expert survey revealed that increasing T stage and complicated inflammatory disease are likely to increase the complexity of the case. Based on this evidence, a framework for case selection in training was proposed.
LIMITATIONS: : The generalizability of the study results maybe reduced because of inconsistent data quality and individual variations in the length of the learning curve
CONCLUSIONS: : This multicenter database suggests a length of the learning curve of 88 to 152 cases. The use of the suggested framework may prevent high conversion and complication rates during the learning curve.
Authors:
Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Susannah M Wyles; Paris Tekkis; George B Hanna
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Diseases of the colon and rectum     Volume:  55     ISSN:  1530-0358     ISO Abbreviation:  Dis. Colon Rectum     Publication Date:  2012 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-11-08     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372764     Medline TA:  Dis Colon Rectum     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1300-10     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
1 Department of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom 2 Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Single-access laparoscopic colectomy utilizing gravity in the lateral decubitus position.
Next Document:  Effects of Elevated Peroxidase Levels and Corn Earworm Feeding on Gene Expression in Tomato.