Document Detail


Lay and expert perceptions of zoonotic risks: understanding conflicting perspectives in the light of moral theory.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15808359     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
As in many other areas, there is a divide between lay and expert perceptions of risk within the food sector, and this can lead to disagreement over priorities in food risk management. The risk perception literature tends to stress that the parties involved in this disagreement have different concepts of risk and hence are bound more or less to talk at cross-purposes. This paper suggests an alternative analysis: In the light of moral theory, the conflicting perspectives can be understood as a genuine moral conflict. When this conflict is conceptualised, a rational dialogue becomes possible. The paper reports a series of qualitative interviews with lay people and experts on zoonotic food risks. The interviews are used to reconstruct the values underlying some of the dominant perspectives. The conflict between these stylised perspectives is then analysed with the help of moral theory. Finally, some consequences for risk communication are made clear.
Authors:
K K Jensen; J Lassen; P Robinson; P Sandøe
Related Documents :
11518559 - Food biotechnology: dietitians' resource needs as determined by selected canadian key i...
16779999 - Ethnic-food safety concerns: an online survey of food safety professionals.
16506799 - Glass distilling collector applied for hcn recovery from submerged culture broth and fr...
10595299 - Food safety control in the republic of korea.
19354199 - The importance of hygiene in the domestic kitchen: implications for preparation and sto...
15638749 - Regulating the safety of probiotics--the european approach.
15168039 - Comparison of dietary habits in the urban and rural croatian schoolchildren.
23572839 - Role of nutraceuticals in human health.
16114699 - Comparison of maturation ponds and constructed wetlands as the final stage of an advanc...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal of food microbiology     Volume:  99     ISSN:  0168-1605     ISO Abbreviation:  Int. J. Food Microbiol.     Publication Date:  2005 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-04-05     Completed Date:  2005-06-06     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8412849     Medline TA:  Int J Food Microbiol     Country:  Netherlands    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  245-55     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment (CeBRA), Dept. of Education, Philosophy and Rhetoric, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade 80, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. kkjensen@hum.ku.dk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Syndrome / transmission
Denmark
Expert Testimony*
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Perception*
Public Opinion*
Risk Assessment / methods
Risk Factors
Risk Management / methods,  organization & administration
Salmonella Food Poisoning / transmission
Zoonoses*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Dynamics of indigenous yeast populations during spontaneous fermentation of wines from Mendoza, Arge...
Next Document:  Use of mustard flour to inactivate Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef under nitrogen flushed pa...