Document Detail

Larval food quantity affects development time, survival and adult biological traits that influence the vectorial capacity of Anopheles darlingi under laboratory conditions.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22856645     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: The incidence of malaria in the Amazon is seasonal and mosquito vectorial capacity parameters, including abundance and longevity, depend on quantitative and qualitative aspects of the larval diet. Anopheles darlingi is a major malaria vector in the Amazon, representing >95% of total Anopheles population present in the Porto Velho region. Despite its importance in the transmission of the Plasmodium parasite, knowledge of the larval biology and ecology is limited. Studies regarding aspects of adult population ecology are more common than studies on larval ecology. However, in order develop effective control strategies and laboratory breeding conditions for this species, more data on the factors affecting vector biology is needed. The aim of the present study is to assess the effects of larval food quantity on the vectorial capacity of An. darling under laboratory conditions.
METHODS: Anopheles darlingi was maintained at 28°C, 80% humidity and exposed to a daily photoperiod of 12 h. Larvae were divided into three experimental groups that were fed either a low, medium, or high food supply (based on the food amounts consumed by other species of culicids). Each experiment was replicated for six times. A cohort of adults were also exposed to each type of diet and assessed for several biological characteristics (e.g. longevity, bite frequency and survivorship), which were used to estimate the vectorial capacity of each experimental group.
RESULTS: The group supplied with higher food amounts observed a reduction in development time while larval survival increased. In addition to enhanced longevity, increasing larval food quantity was positively correlated with increasing frequency of bites, longer blood meal duration and wing length, resulting in greater vectorial capacity. However, females had greater longevity than males despite having smaller wings.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, several larval and adult biological traits were significantly affected by larval food availability. Greater larval food supply led to enhance larval and production and larger mosquitoes with longer longevity and higher biting frequency. Thus, larval food availability can alter important biological traits that influence the vectorial capacity of An. darlingi.
Maisa da-Silva Araújo; Luiz Herman S Gil; Alexandre de-Almeida e-Silva
Related Documents :
11074065 - Ethylamine in human urine.
2280385 - Hyperendemic malaria in a thai village: dependence of year-round transmission on focal ...
2240625 - Cytogenetical and histopathologic study of two cases of polled goats.
20520735 - Torpor on demand: heterothermy in the non-lemur primate galago moholi.
10717845 - Physicochemical, molecular and immunological characterization of camel calf rennet: a c...
22696895 - Dietary patterns are associated with overweight and obesity in mexican school-age child...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2012-08-02
Journal Detail:
Title:  Malaria journal     Volume:  11     ISSN:  1475-2875     ISO Abbreviation:  Malar. J.     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-12     Completed Date:  2013-01-30     Revised Date:  2013-07-12    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101139802     Medline TA:  Malar J     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  261     Citation Subset:  IM    
Laboratory of Entomology, Tropical Pathology Research Institute/Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Porto Velho, Rondonia, Brazil.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Anopheles / growth & development*
Behavior, Animal
Larva / growth & development
Survival Analysis
Time Factors

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Malar J
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Malar. J
ISSN: 1475-2875
Publisher: BioMed Central
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright ©2012 Araújo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Received Day: 3 Month: 5 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 3 Month: 7 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 2 Month: 8 Year: 2012
Volume: 11First Page: 261 Last Page: 261
ID: 3469369
Publisher Id: 1475-2875-11-261
PubMed Id: 22856645
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-261

Larval food quantity affects development time, survival and adult biological traits that influence the vectorial capacity of Anopheles darlingi under laboratory conditions
Maisa da-Silva Araújo1 Email:
Luiz Herman S Gil1 Email:
Alexandre de-Almeida e-Silva12 Email:
1Laboratory of Entomology, Tropical Pathology Research Institute/Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Porto Velho, Rondonia, Brazil
2Laboratory of Insect Bioecology, Department of Biology, Federal University of Rondonia, Porto Velho, Rondonia, Brazil


Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) are medically the most important group of insects due to the disease they transmit and the magnitude of health problems that these diseases cause worldwide. The important role of vectors in the transmission of malaria, yellow fever, dengue fever and filariasis have led to intensive studies of their biology. Since the beginning of the 20th century, considerable attention has been given to the food requirements of the larvae, in order to aim to reduce or eliminate food supplies in larval natural breeding sites [1].

Both quantitative and qualitative aspects of larval nutrition are important to mosquito development and survival [2], and also to the emergence of adults [3]. Several species of mosquito larvae are non-selective filter feeders of organic particles suspended in water and of micro-organisms such as bacteria, viruses, protozoans and fungi [4]. Furthermore, pollen [5] as well as algae and bacteria [2] contribute to their development. Bacteria are the most abundant micro-organisms present in larval food, and mosquito growth can occur with bacteria as the only food source [6]. Conversely, adults, require protein for their development, mainly for pupation [7].

Currently, larval feeding studies aim to provide information to laboratory breeding; studies for potential larvicides, since there is no qualitative selectivity of particles ingested [4], and also basic biological knowledge on the effect of quality and quantity of food intake on growth, development and reproduction of insects in general [8].

Previous studies have shown that food availability affects larval development [6,9,10], adult emergence, sexual maturation, fecundity, survival [11], body size [6,12] and nutrient reserves [13].

Several studies investigated the relationship between food quantity, larval development and adult production. Wallace and Merritt [14] performed laboratory experiments with Anopheles quadrimaculatus and argued that larval survival was greater with enhanced food resources. Anopheles maculipennis larvae fed improperly displayed delayed larval development and decreased survival to the fourth instar [1].

According to Nelson [15], the body size of various species of culicides species has a genetic basis, but is also influenced by environmental factors. An increase in body size increases the probability of survival and success in the acquiring blood meal and in some species, the parasite infectivity [16], the parity and the vectorial capacity (VC) [17].

The VC, ie, the property of a vector to transmit the pathogen resulting in new cases of a specific disease, has increasingly attracted attention from researchers interested in its relationship with larvae food availability because it affects adult size and survival [14].

Tun-Lin et al.[9] related that increased size in Aedes aegypti led to higher VC and Schneider et al.[18] argued that the adult mosquito size of Culex might be a determinant factor for its VC.

The incidence of malaria in Rondonia, as in other tropical regions, is seasonal and related to variation in the number of breeding sites as well as the physico-chemical characteristics of breeding sites [19], which can alter the food availability for vector in the immature stages, and thus affecting the biological parameters previously mentioned.

Anopheles darlingi is the main malaria vector in the Amazon, accounting for 99% of the mosquitoes captured in the Rondonia region [20]. Despite the importance of An. darlingi in disease transmission, knowledge about the biology and ecology of the larval form is limited.

The larval biology studies have evaluated factors that affect the biology vector, such as longevity, VC, adult size and dispersal [14]. Knowledge of larval biology could contribute to modelling of population dynamic [21] and improving vector control measures [22,23]. In addition, it may improve existing An. darlingi rearing procedures in the laboratory in order to promote faster larval development, higher survival rates, and production of homogeneous adult population. The goal of this study is to investigate the effects of the larval food amount on the biology (eg, larval development, survival, adult survival and size) of the vector An. darlingi and its impact on the VC under laboratory conditions.

Rearing Anopheles darlingi

Mosquitoes were collected using protected human landing catches performed by adult volunteers (authors of the present study) from 18:00 and 21:00 h at Vila Candelária in Porto Velho, Rondonia. Ethic clearance of the procedure was given by the Ethic Committee of the CEPEM (n° 056/2007) which included written and signed information about the risk of acquiring malaria during captures. An average of one hundred mosquitoes were blood-fed on rabbits for 15 min the next day after field catches. Females were induced to oviposition, removing one of the wings using tweezers under a stereomicroscope and the placed individually in small plastic cups filled distilled water [24]. The next morning, females with more than one hundred eggs were used in the experiments and replicates comprised of 100 eggs from a single female.

Mosquitoes were reared in insect-rearing chambers maintained at 27 ± 1°C and 80% relative humidity and exposed to fluorescent light for 12 h daily combined with daylight [7]. Early hatched first instar larvae were kept in plastic pans (40 × 40 × 5 cm) containing 1 l of distilled water and 100 larvae/pan and fed with finely grinded fish food (TetraMin Tropical Flakes-Spectrum Brands, Inc). The rearing pans were inspected daily to maintain consistent water levels and remove debris from the water using plastic pipettes whenever necessary. Pupae were transferred to disposable plastic cups containing distilled water and stored in empty cages until adult emergence.

The first generation (F1) larvae were fed with different food amounts (Table 1) and some biological traits of larvae and adult were analysed.

Effects of food amount on biology of Anopheles darlingi

Batches of larvae were divided into three experimental groups: low, medium and high food supply based on the food amounts consumed by other species of culicids [7]. There were six replicates for each treatment. Larval development and survival was recorded twice daily (06:00 and 18:00). Larval exuviae and dead individuals were removed and counted. Mortality at each stage and the number of emerged adult males and females were recorded. Larvae were counted daily and categorized according to instars as determined visually. The presence of exuviae indicated changes of larval instars [25].

Duration of larval development, mortality rate and longevity of adults

The basic methodology developed by Forattini et al.[26] for calculating of average duration of developmental stages by means of the variable median stage of insects was applied here to evaluate mosquito stage duration. The median stage of raising (Ei) in each inspection was noted in intervals of 12 h, to determine the median stage of distribution of frequencies of the number of individuals in the various stages. The numbers 1 to 4 correspond to the first, second, third, fourth larval instars, respectively, 5 to the stage of pupa and 6 to the adult. Survival rate of each stage (sj), survival rate (S) and mortality rate (IM) were calculated according to Bergo et al.[25]:

Survival rate of each stage (sj)

[Formula ID: bmcM1]
sj=1− dead larvae at stage jn°survivors at stage j

Survival rate total (S)

[Formula ID: bmcM2]
S= s1+s2+....+s5

S1: n° of larvae in the beginning of stage 1.

S2: n° of larvae in the beginning of stage 5.

The number of days that adult (five individuals) survived, ie, not inseminated females and males of each treatment (six replicates), was used to determine adult longevity. These mosquitoes were maintained with 20% sucrose, water and periodic blood meals from a human arm twice a week for 15 min.

Vectorial capacity

Vectorial capacity (VC) was calculated as [27]:

[Formula ID: bmcM3]

Vector density (m) was held constant (5 females), survivorship (p) and average bite frequency (a) were determined in the laboratory [28]. Daily survival rate (p) was calculated by the formula p = d√P, in which d is duration of the study (10 days) and P the proportion of females survive by the end of that period [29]. Five newly emerged females from each experimental group were placed individually in plastic cages and offered a blood meal daily during 10 minutes in the arms of a human host (author of the present work). The proportion of females that ingested or attempted to ingest blood from the human host was used to estimate bite frequency [28]. The extrinsic incubation period (n) in the mosquito for Plasmodium falciparum used was 16 days at the 27°C, according to Klein et al.[30].

Wing length

One wing of each mosquito was mounted on a slide and measured using a binocular microscope equipped with an ocular micrometer (accuracy of 0.1 mm). The wing length was measured as the distance from axillary incision (alula) to the apical margin (radius veins) [31].

Data analysis

The effect of food amount in the biology of the vector was (larval development, survival, adult longevity, biting frequency and wing length) was analysed by One Way ANOVA on ranks (Kruskal-Wallis). Correlation among different variables were performed in tests using Pearson for parametric data and Spearman for non-parametric data (SigmaStat 2.03 SPSS Inc., 1992–1997).

Results and Discussion

The larval development time was affected by the different amounts of food provided daily (F = 77.98; P < 0.001). Generally, the development time decreased with increasing food (Figure 1). This result agrees with similar studies of other mosquito species, eg, Anopheles stephennsi [32], A. aegypti [9,33], Toxorhynchites splendens [10], Anopheles gambiae [34] and An. quadrimaculatus [35] where food availability varied over time.

The group supplied with the highest food amount had accelerated development during the early instars while the fourth instar had longer duration, usually, the longest duration (H = 63.4; P < 0.001) (Table 2). Furthermore, the group supplied with the lower food amount experienced longer first and third instar. According to Lara et al.[36], poor diet causes an extended larval period and since immature spend 25% of their biomass on average [37] moulting, mosquito larvae must acquire enough food supply for ecdysis to avoid a high mortality rate [38].

The data indicates that the first and four instars took longer to develop especially when immature were supplied with low and medium food amounts. Notably, the fourth instar had the longest duration compared to other instars, probably because it precedes the pupal stage which possess the greatest amount of nutrition reserves that are required for the transition to adulthood via moulting [4,25,39]. Telang et al.[38] reported that a critical larval mass for reaching pupal stage in A. aegypti depended upon both hormonal control and nourishment of the.

Larval survival was also affected by the different food supply (F = 129.89; P < 0.001), which observed an increase in numbers with increasing food amounts; differences among all larval instars statistically significant (H = 76.4; P < 0.001). Overall, the last two instars accounted for most of the deaths in groups provided with the low food amount (Table 2).

The pupae survival significantly increased with increasing food amounts, probably due to nutrition reserves rich in lipids [8,40] that accumulated during the larval stage [4,6]. This may account for the high mortality observed for pupae subjected to low food supply.

Although the development time to adulthood was not measured here, past studies have observed that the males generally emerge before females in nature and the laboratory [37,41,42]. Furthermore, larvae survival and development time had a negative correlation. Similar results were previously reported for An. darlingi [25], An. stephensi [32], A. aegypti [9], T. Splendens [10], Anopheles arabiensis [5,43], An. gambiae [34] and An. quadrimaculatus [35].

Larval development time in An. darlingi was much longer compared to other mosquito species. Under natural conditions, the duration of the entire development period generally ranges from 12 to 14 days [4], depending on the mosquito gender [43]. However, shorter development time is frequently observed in mosquitoes, eg, An. gambiae[44]that breed in unstable and transient sites [4], or when submitted to predation [35].

Anopheles gambiae larvae that were similarly reared at 28°C and supplied with food ad libitum, completed their development in 9.9 to 11 days [45]. However, An. gambiae mosquito development occurred more quickly to other anophelines species [46].

Santos et al.[47] studied the biology of An. darlingi under laboratory conditions and reported that the transition from egg to adult took an average of 15.6 days with a survival rate of 57%. Bergo et al.[25] reported a shorter development period of 13.9 days and an overall survival of 95%. However, the quality and quantity of larval food differed substantially from the present work. Moreover, rearing conditions differed and therefore, precluding suitable comparison of data.

The larval development time of An. darlingi occurs within 9.5 days in the field; shorter than An. darlingi larvae reared in the laboratory [48]. Besides extrinsic factors, one possible explanation for this discrepancy between the field and laboratory result may be due to the presence of open water habitats that provide significantly more micro-invertebrate dietary resources for An. darlingi larvae.

The daily survival (p) of female larvae reared with low, medium and high amounts of food was 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6, respectively. The lifetime biting frequencies (a) were 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9, respectively. Therefore, P. falciparum incubated for 16 days extrinsically under a constant temperature of 27°C and constant vector density of five females/person would experience a 30-fold increase in vectorial capacity compared to the low and high fed experimental groups under laboratory conditions (Table 3).

The group fed with the high food amount had better adult survival (H = 19.60; P < 0.001) and longer wing length (H = 24.95; P < 0.001) than adults that emerged from larvae reared with a low food amount (Table 3).

Grimstad and Walker [12] and Lyimo and Koella [16] also related similar results with the mosquitoes Aedes triseriatus and An. gambiae s.l., respectively.

High population density of An. darlingi in the field relate to transformations in larval habits [49] because environmental variations, such as food resources, directly affect larval development and adult production as related in this work. Nutrition reserves acquired during the immature stages play a role in the reproductive success of the adult [50,51]. Since An. darlingi does not mate under laboratory conditions, the reproduction parameters of this species could not be evaluated. However, the amount of food availability to the larvae of other mosquito species, including A. aegypti and Ochlerotatus atropalpus, affected the number of mature primary egg follicles [50,51] and the number of eggs oviposited by An. stephensis[32], which consequently altered the VC.

Larvae supplied with the high food amount resulted in adults with higher longevity (H = 6.86; P = 0.03) (Table 3). In general, females survived better than males (H = 12.17; P < 0.001) (Figure 2A), but not when larvae were submitted to a lower food amount.

The longevity of An. darlingi adults was affected by food amount available during the larval stage. This was also reported for An. stephensis[32] and An. arabiensis[52]. Nutrient reserves of adults (mainly glycogen and triglycerides) obtained during the larval stage, contribute to an increase the longevity [7,37], which may explain the shorter longevity of adults derived from larvae supplied with low food amount.

Anopheles darlingi males had shorter lifespan than females. This was also related to other mosquito species [53,54] and the males were the first to emerge, with shorter time to obtain nutritional reserves. Moreover, females can increase their lifespan with multiple blood meals [28].

Female longevity varied from 11 to 15 days when larvae were subjected to increasing food amounts, which was lower compared to other tropical mosquito species with an average of 19 to 23 days [4]. However, this was sufficient time to allow the malaria parasite P. falciparum to complete development within An. darlingi[55].

Wing length was significantly affected by the food supply (H = 11.54; P < 0.001) with males possessing wings longer than females (Figure 2B).

Despite the significant margin, there was a positive correlation between wing size and the longevity of An. darlingi. Several studies explored the relation between vector size and longevity found that larger mosquitoes usually had higher survival rates than smaller ones [9,54,56], with a few exceptions [57].

Since An. darlingi females captured in the field displayed a wide-range of wing sizes compared with other Anopheles species, this suggested that these mosquitoes originated from different larval habitats [58]. Furthermore, the wing size of An. darlingi captured in peri-urban regions of Porto Velho, Rondonia varied significantly throughout the year (Batista, pers. comm.).

Time is important for males in seasonal breeding populations because males that emerge earlier can mate with more females. On the other hand, the effect of size on mating success is rather small. Body size is more important for females because it determines fecundity during lifetime [54]. In the present work, males were larger than females, contrary to the results from Lehmann et al.[54]. One possible explanation concerns larvae development since males that develop faster undergo ecdysis first. Thus, these males are favoured in the competition for food with females.

The mean wing size of An. darlingi females captured from the field was larger than individuals reared in laboratory [58]. Data obtained by Batista (pers. comm.) support these results for An. darlingi, but not for other species as related by Grieco et al.[48] and Lounibos et al.[58].

Body size of female mosquitoes affects dispersion, host attack rate [59], the number of eggs laid [56], and the success and frequency of blood meals [17]. The wing size of An. darlingi females that were fed high amounts as larvae was significantly larger than females that were fed low food amounts. The former females had higher biting frequency and a positive correlation between the wing size, biting frequency (R = 0.24; P = 0.02) and biting duration (R = 0.23; P = 0.03).

The relation between the body size and VC of mosquitoes has attracted the attention of researchers for a while. Smaller females often require two to three blood meals to develop their first batch of eggs. The frequency blood meals may increase the probability that smaller females acquire an infectious blood meal [2,18]. In addition, longer blood meals by larger females [18,32] may increase the number of gametocytes ingested and increasing the probability of infection by the vector [3]. The size of the mosquito also influences oocyst numbers in the midgut of naturally infected mosquitoes [16], supporting the hypothesis that mosquitoes arising from well nourished larvae are more competent for parasite transmission.

The biting frequency of An. darlingi over a 10-day period tends to decrease over time, differing from the results with An. gambiae [28]. However, field data indicated that the frequency of bites of A. aegypti decreases with age, leading to a decrease in VC [60].

Females from high fed larvae had bite peaks close to three days, following the duration of gonotrophic cycle of An. darlingi [7], while those from low fed larvae had a consistent biting pattern, possibly to supply nutritional reserves that were not sufficient during the larval stage (Figure 3).

Wing size, adult longevity, and frequency of bites are important determinants of VC and fitness of mosquitoes. It is worth noting that larval development time also affects VC indirectly [61] as related in the present work. Finally, larval breeding environment changes, such as food resources, affects the population composition and adult fitness [18,62] and thus may affect the incidence of human malaria due to variations in the VC of An. darlingi.


Multiple biological parameters of An. darlingi were significantly affected by the amount food provided to larvae. Larval development time was significantly longer and mortality rate was higher when larvae were fed with low food amounts. These conditions also resulted in a reduction in adult longevity and number of progeny, and a low VC (VC = 1.5). On the other hand, larvae fed with the high food amount produced adults with larger wing sizes and longer longevity, greatly increasing the VC (VC = 52).

Moreover, the data suggests rearing An. darlingi with high food quantity in laboratory, since a higher food supply accelerates larval development and improves adult fitness.


a: Average bit frequency; CEPEM: Research Center in Tropical Medicine; Ei: Median stage of raising; F1: First generation; IM: Mortality rate; m: Vector density; S: Survival rate; sj: Survival rate of each stage; p: Daily survival rate; VC: Vectorial capacity.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to the development of this work and provided comments on the manuscript. MSA performed the experiments supervised by AAS. MAS drafted the manuscript and AAS and LHSG reviewed manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the financing from PPP-SEPLAN/RO/CNPq grant n°02/2007and and Mei Tong, UMass Medical School for the English revision of the manuscript. The authors also acknowledge support from the IPEPATRO. MSA was supported by a CNPq scholarship. None of the funding bodies were involved in study design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Hinman EH,A study of the food mosquito larvae (Culicidae)Am J EpidemiolYear: 193012238270
Gimnig JE,Ombok M,Otieno S,Kaufman MG,Vulule JM,Walker ED,Density-dependent development of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae in artificial habitatsJ Med EntomolYear: 20023916217210.1603/0022-2585-39.1.16211931252
Okech BA,Gouagna LC,Yan G,Githure JI,Beier JC,Larval habitat of Anopheles gambiae s.s. (Diptera: Culicidae) influences vector competence to Plasmodium falciparum parasiteMalar JYear: 200765010.1186/1475-2875-6-5017470293
Forattini OP,Culicidologia Médica: identificação, biologia e epidemiologiaYear: 2002São Paulo: EDUSP
Ye-Ebiyo Y,Pollack RJ,Kiszewski A,Spielman A,Enhancement of development of larval Anopheles arabiensis by proximity to flowering maize (Zea Mays) in turbid water and when crowdedAm J Trop Med HygYear: 20036874875212887038
Merritt RW,Dadd RH,Walker ED,Feeding behavior, natural food, and nutritional relationships of larval mosquitoesAnn Rev EntomolYear: 19923734937610.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.0020251347208
Consoli RAGB,Lourenço-de-Oliveira R,Principais Mosquitos de Importância Sanitária no BrasilYear: 1994Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz
Panizzi AR,Parra JRP,Ecologia Nutricional de Insetos e suas implicações no Manejo de PragasYear: 1991São Paulo: Manole LTDA
Tun-Lin W,Burkot TR,Kay H,Effects of temperature and larval diet on development rates and survival of the dengue vector Aedes Aegypti in North Queensland, AustraliaMed Vet EntomolYear: 200014313710.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00207.x10759309
Dominic Amalraj D,Sivagname N,Das PK,Effect of food on immature development, consumption rate, and relative of Toxorhynchites splendens (Diptera: Culicidae), a predator of container breeding mosquitoesMem Inst Oswaldo CruzYear: 200510089390210.1590/S0074-0276200500080001216444422
Dominic Amalraj D,Das PK,Life-table characteristics of T. splendens (Diptera: Culicidae) cohorts reared under controlled found regimensJ Vector EcolYear: 199621136145
Grimstad PR,Walker ED,Aedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) and La Crosse virus. IV. Nutritional deprivation of larvae affects the adult barriers to infection and transmissionJ Med EntomolYear: 1991283783861875364
Gullan PJ,Cranston PS,The insects: an outline of entomologyYear: 1999London: Kluwer academic publishers
Wallace JR,Merritt RW,Influence of microclimate, food, and predation on Anopheles quadrimaculatus (Diptera: Culicidae) growth and development rate, survivorship, and adult size in a Michigan pondEnviron EntomolYear: 199928233239
Nelson JM,Aedes aegypti: Biologia y EcologiaYear: 1986Organizacion Panamericana de la Salud: Washington, DC
Lyimo EO,Koella J,Relationship between body size of adult Anopheles gambiae s.l. and infection with the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparumParasitologyYear: 199210423323710.1017/S00311820000616671594289
Kitthawee S,Edman JD,Upatham ES,Relationship between female Anopheles dirus (Diptera: Culicidae) body size and parity in a biting populationJ Med EntomolYear: 1992299219261460629
Schneider JR,Morrison AC,Astete H,Scott TW,Wilson ML,Adult size and distribution of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) associated with larval habitats in Iquitos, PeruJ Med EntomolYear: 20044163464210.1603/0022-2585-41.4.63415311454
Oyewole IO,Momoh OO,Anyasor GN,Ogunnowo AA,Ibidapo CA,Oduola OA,Obansa JB,Awolola TS,Physico-chemical characteristics of Anopheles breeding sites: Impact on fecundity and progeny developmentAfr J Environ Sci TechnolYear: 20093447452
Gil LHS,Alves FP,Zieler H,Salcedo JMV,Durlacher RR,Cunha RPA,Tada MS,Camargo LMA,Camargo EP,Pereira-da-Silva LH,Seasonal malaria transmission and variation of anopheline density in two distinct endemic areas in Brazilian AmazoniaJ Med EntomolYear: 20034063664110.1603/0022-2585-40.5.63614596276
Depinay JMO,Mbogo CM,Killeen G,Knols B,Beier J,Carlson J,Dushoff J,Billingsley P,Mwambi H,Githure J,Toure AM,McKenzie FE,A simulation model of African Anopheles ecology and population dynamics for the analysis of malaria transmissionMalar JYear: 20043310.1186/1475-2875-3-314998435
MalERA Consultative Group on Vector ControlA research agenda for malaria eradication: vector controlPLoS MedYear: 20118e100040121311587
Ferguson HM,Dornhaus A,Beeche A,Borgemeister C,Gottlieb M,Mulla MS,Gimnig JE,Fish D,Killeen GF,Ecology: A prerequisite for malaria elimination and eradicationPLoS MedYear: 20107e100030310.1371/journal.pmed.100030320689800
Lanzaro GC,Narang SK,Mitchell SE,Kaiser PE,Seawright JA,Hybrid male sterility in crosses between field and laboratory strains of Anopheles quadrimaculatus (Say) (Diptera: Culicidae)J Med EntomolYear: 1988252482553404543
Bergo ES,Buralli GM,Santos JLF,Gurgel SM,Avaliação do desenvolvimento larval de Anopheles darlingi criado em laboratório sob diferentes dietasRev Saúde PúblYear: 19902495100
Forattini OP,Santos JLF,Ferreira AO,Silva EOR,Rabello EX,Aspectos ecológicos da Tripanossomíase Americana X- dados populacionais das colônias de Planstrongylus megistus e de Triatoma sordida espontaneamente desenvolvida em ecótopos artificiaisRev Saúde PúblYear: 197711362374
Forattini OP,Ecologia, epidemiologia e sociedadeYear: 1992São Paulo: Edusp/Artes Médicas
Gary RE Jr,Foster WA,Effects of available sugar on the reproductive fitness and vectorial capacity of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae)J Med EntomolYear: 200138222810.1603/0022-2585-38.1.2211268686
Almeida AP,Baptista SS,Sousa CA,Novo MT,Ramos HC,Panella NA,Godsey M,Simões MJ,Anselmo ML,Komar N,Mitchell CJ,Ribeiro H,Bioecology and vectorial capacity of Aedes albopivtus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Macao, China, in relation to dengue virus transmissionJ Med EntomolYear: 20054241942810.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[0419:BAVCOA]2.0.CO;215962796
Klein TA,Lima JBP,Tada MS,Comparative susceptibility of anopheline mosquitoes to Plasmodium falciparum in Rondônia, BrazilAm J Trop Med HygYear: 1991445986031858963
Nasci R,Relationship of wing length to adult dry weight in several mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae)J Med EntomolYear: 1990277167192388250
Grech K,Maung LA,Read AF,The effect of parental rearing conditions on offspring life history in Anopheles stephensiMalar JYear: 2007613010.1186/1475-2875-6-13017892562
Arrivillaga J,Barrera R,Food as a limiting factor for Aedes aegypti in water-storage containersJ Vector EcolYear: 200429112015266737
Pfaehler O,Oulo DO,Gouagna LC,Githure J,Guerin PM,Influence of soil quality in the larval habitat on development of Anopheles gambiae GilesJ Vector EcolYear: 20063140040510.3376/1081-1710(2006)31[400:IOSQIT]2.0.CO;217249359
Knight TM,Chase JM,Goss CW,Knight JJ,Effects of interspecific competition, predation, and their interaction on survival and development time of immature Anopheles quadrimaculatusJ Vector EcolYear: 20042927728415707287
Lara FM,Princípios de EntomologiaYear: 19923São Paulo: Ícone Editora
Clements AN,The biology of mosquitoes: Development, nutrition and reproductionYear: 1992London: Chapman & Hall
Telang A,Frame L,Brown MR,Larval feeding duration affects ecdysteroid levels and nutritional reserves regulating pupal commitment in the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)J Exp BiolYear: 200721085486410.1242/jeb.0271517297145
Nijhout HT,The control of body size in insectsDevelopmentYear: 20031305863586710.1242/dev.0090214597569
Nayar JK,The biology of Culex nigripalpus Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae). Part 2. Adult characteristics at emergence and adult survival without nourishmentJ Med EntomolYear: 196852032105658608
Agnew P,Haussy C,Michalakis Y,Effects of density and larval competition on selected life history traits of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)J Med EntomolYear: 20003773273510.1603/0022-2585-37.5.73211004786
Mwangangi JM,Muturi EJ,Shililu J,Muriu SM,Jacob B,Kabiru EW,Mbogo CM,Githure J,Novak R,Survival of immature Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in aquatic habitats in Mwea rice irrigation scheme, central KenyaMalar JYear: 2006511410.1186/1475-2875-5-11417125501
Service MW,Mosquito ecology: field sampling methodsYear: 19932London: Chapman & Hall
Gimnig JE,Ombok M,Kamau L,Hawley WA,Characteristics of larval anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) habitats in Western KenyaJ Med EntomolYear: 20013828228810.1603/0022-2585-38.2.28211296836
Bayoh MN,Lindsay SW,Temperature-related duration of aquatic stages of the Afrotropical malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae in the laboratoryMed Vet EntomolYear: 20041817417910.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00495.x15189243
Killeen GF,Seyoum A,Knols BGJ,Rationalizing historical successes of malaria control in Africa in terms of mosquito resource availability managementAm J Trop Med HygYear: 200471879315331823
Santos JM,Contel EP,Kerr WE,Biology of Amazonian Anopheles. 1. Biological cycle, egg laying and larval stages of Anopheles darlingi Root 1926 (Diptera: Culicidae) of Manaus-Boa Vista HighwayActa AmazYear: 198111789797
Grieco JP,Rejmánková E,Achee NL,Klein CN,Andre R,Roberts D,Habitat suitability for three species of Anopheles mosquitoes: Larval growth and survival in reciprocal placement experimentsJ Vector EcolYear: 20073217618710.3376/1081-1710(2007)32[176:HSFTSO]2.0.CO;218260505
Charlwood JD,Biological Variation in Anopheles darlingi RootMem Inst Oswaldo CruzYear: 1996913913989070397
Telang A,Wells MA,The effect of larval and adult nutrition on successful autogenous egg production by a mosquitoJ Insect PhysiolYear: 20045067768510.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.05.00115234628
Telang A,Li Y,Noriega FG,Brown MR,Effects of larval nutrition on the endocrinology of mosquito egg developmentJ Exp BiolYear: 200620964565510.1242/jeb.0202616449559
Ameneshewa B,Service MW,The relationship between female body size and survival rate of the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis in EthiopiaMed Vet EntomolYear: 19961017017210.1111/j.1365-2915.1996.tb00724.x8744710
Maharaj R,Life table characteristics of Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) under simulated seasonal conditionsJ Med EntomolYear: 20034073774210.1603/0022-2585-40.6.73714765646
Lehmann T,Dalton R,Kim EH,Dahl E,Diabate A,Dabire R,Dujardin JP,Genetic contribution to variation in larval development time, adult size, and longevity of starved adults of Anopheles gambiaeInfect Genet EvolYear: 2006641041610.1016/j.meegid.2006.01.00716524787
Anderson RM,May RM,Infectious Diseases of humanYear: 1991New York: Oxford Science Publication
Gama RA,Alves KC,Martins RF,Eiras AE,Resende MC,Efeito da densidade larval no tamanho de adultos de Aedes aegypti criados em condições de laboratórioRev Soc Bras Med TropYear: 200538646610.1590/S0037-8682200500010001415717099
Koenraadt CJ,Paaijmans KP,Schneider P,Githeko AK,Takken W,Low larval vector survival explains unstable malaria in the western Kenya highlandsTrop Med Int HealthYear: 200621195120516903883
Lounibos LP,Nishimura N,Conn J,Lourenço-de-Oliveira R,Life history correlates of adult size in the malaria vector Anopheles darlingiMem Inst Oswaldo CruzYear: 19959076977410.1590/S0074-027619950006000208731375
Vargas REM,Ya-umphan P,Phumala-Morales N,Komalamisra N,Dujardin JP,Climate associated size and shape changes in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) populations from ThailandInfect Genet EvolYear: 20101058058510.1016/j.meegid.2010.01.00420123039
Canyon DV,Hii JLK,Muller R,The frequency of host biting and its effect on oviposition and survival in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)J Med EntomolYear: 19993630130810337099
Armnruster P,Hutchinson RA,Pupal mass and wing length as indicators of fecundity in Aedes albopictus and Aedes geniculatus (Diptera: Culicidae)J Med EntomolYear: 20023969970410.1603/0022-2585-39.4.69912144308
Paaijmans KP,Wandago MO,Githeko AK,Takken W,Unexpected high losses of Anopheles gambiae larvae due to rainfallPLoS ONEYear: 20072e114610.1371/journal.pone.000114617987125


[Figure ID: F1]
Figure 1 

Survival and average instar duration of Anopheles darlingi larvae fed with increasing food amounts. L1, L2, L3 and L4 indicate the first, second, third and fourth larval instars, respectively and L5 indicates the pupal stage. See Table 1 for food amount supplied to each instar.

[Figure ID: F2]
Figure 2 

Daily proportion of biting Anopheles darlingi emerged from larvae fed with increasing food amounts. One Way Repeated measures ANOVA. NS: indicates no significant differences (P>0.05). See Table1 for food amount supplied to each instar.

[Figure ID: F3]
Figure 3 

Adult longevity (A) and wing length of male and female (B) Anopheles darlingi emerged from larvae fed with increasing food amounts. Anova on ranks (Kruskal-Wallis) and Dunn's method (comparisons); n=38 (Low) and n=80 (Medium and High); Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05). See Table 1 for food amount supplied to each instar.

[TableWrap ID: T1] Table 1 

Food amounts (mg) supplied to the larvae of Anopheles darlingi

Food amount
  Low Medium High
4 10 15 30

The amount corresponds to 100 larvae. In the first and second instars, the food is offered only once a day, for the third instar twice and to the third and fourth instars, three times a day.

Food supply based on the food amounts consumed by other culicid species [7].

[TableWrap ID: T2] Table 2 

Survival and larval instar duration of Anopheles darlingi (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae fed with increasing food concentrations under controlled conditions

Duration of instars (days)
Survival (%)
Food amount
Food amount
Instars Low Medium High Low Medium High
L5 1.9c1 1.8c1 1.8c1 13.0e 1 33.0e2 52,5e3

One way Anova on ranks (Kruskal-Wallis) and Student-Newman-Keuls (comparisons); n=6; Different letters indicates significant differences (P<0,05) for the same column. Different numbers indicates significant differences (P<0.05) for the same line. L1 – L4 corresponds to the four larval instars and the pupal to L5; See Table 1 for food amounts supplied to each instar.

[TableWrap ID: T3] Table 3 

Biological parameters of Anopheles darlingi females emerged from larvae fed with increasing food amounts under controlled conditions (27 ± 1°C; 80% RU and 12h photoperiod)

Food amount Biting frequency ratio NS Blood meal duration (min) NS Survival (%) Vectorial Capacity Wing length (mm) Longevity (days)
High 0.9 3.6 60.0b 2.8b 52 14.5b

One way Anova on ranks (Kruskal-Wallis) and Dunn's method (comparisons); n=25 (Low food concentration) and n=30(Medium and high food concentrations); Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) in each column. NS= not significant (P>0.05). See table 1 for food amounts supplied to each instar. Biting frequency: ratio of mosquitoes biting from a sample of 5 females caged individually during 10 days for each experimental condition.

Article Categories:
  • Research

Keywords: Anopheles darlingi, Plasmodium, Larval development, Vectorial capacity, Rondonia.

Previous Document:  Selective Sidewall Wetting of Polymer Blocks in Hydrogen Silsesquioxane Directed Self-Assembly of PS...
Next Document:  The p53 Codon 72 Polymorphism and the Risk of Oral Cancer in a Chinese Han Population.