Document Detail

Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus in infants: intermediate results.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21843727     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and postoperative anal function in infants with congenital high imperforate anus treated with laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP).
METHODS: From January 2004 to July 2007, 33 patients (28 boys and 5 girls, age ranging from 3 to 10 months) with high imperforate anus underwent LAARP. Clinical data of the LAARP group were retrospectively compared with those treated by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP; n = 28) during the same time period. Anorectal function of these patients was evaluated using the following 3 methods: the Kelly score, anorectal vector volume manometry, and magnetic resonance imaging between the ages of 3.1 and 4.4 years.
RESULTS: The mean operative time in LAARP and PSARP groups was 112.5 ± 12.4 and 120.4 ± 18.5 minutes (P > .05), respectively. The mean length of hospital stay in the LAARP group was shorter than that of PSARP group (11.3 ± 2.1 vs 14.6 ± 2.3 days, P < .01). No significant difference was observed between LAARP and PSARP groups regarding the Kelly score (3.52 ± 1.42 vs 3.49 ± 0.82). Although magnetic resonance imaging revealed lower malposition rates of rectum in the LAARP group than those of the PSARP group at both I-line (3.0% vs 14.3%) and M-line (3.0% vs 10.7%) levels, this was not statistically different (P > .05). Compared with the PSARP group, lower asymmetric index, larger vector volume, and higher anal canal pressure at rest and during voluntary squeeze were observed in LAARP group (P < .05). However, there were no significant differences in the length of high-pressure zone (15.2 ± 5.8 vs 15.1 ± 6.2 mm) and the presence of rectoanal relaxation reflex (84.8% vs 85.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory fecal continence can be achieved in patients with high-type imperforate anus after LAARP. Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through has advantages over PSARP, including shorter hospital stay and better position of rectum. However, long-term follow-up is necessary to compare the benefits of LAARP against PSARP.
Qiang-Song Tong; Shao-Tao Tang; Jia-Rui Pu; Yong-Zhong Mao; Yong Wang; Shi-Wang Li; Quo-Qing Cao; Qing-Lan Ruan
Related Documents :
21808697 - Early experience with the nexgen® cr-flex mobile knee arthroplasty system: results of 2...
25304147 - The metopic angle: a novel assessment tool of the trigonocephalic frontal deformity and...
7822917 - Initial treatment of closed metacarpal fractures. a controlled comparison of compressio...
22245877 - Improvement of urinary dysfunction after kidney transplantation by administration of th...
18162687 - Anodyne therapy for recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers: a report of four cases.
11757957 - Chronic bilateral pallidal stimulation and levodopa do not improve gait in the same way...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of pediatric surgery     Volume:  46     ISSN:  1531-5037     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Pediatr. Surg.     Publication Date:  2011 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-08-16     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0052631     Medline TA:  J Pediatr Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1578-86     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  A preliminary report on the significance of excessively long segment congenital hypoganglionosis man...
Next Document:  Endosonographic evaluation of anal sphincters in healthy children.