Document Detail


Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21174107     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Whether laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LS) can achieve the same oncologic outcomes compared with open surgery (OS) for rectal cancer remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is to compare oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes of LS with OS in the treatment of rectal cancer. METHODS: Literature searches of electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) and manual searches were performed to identify RCTs comparing values of oncologic adequacy of resection, recurrence, and survival following LS and OS. RESULTS: Six RCTs enrolling 1,033 participants were included in the meta-analysis. LS was associated with similar number of lymph nodes harvested and a similar distal tumor-free margin. LS was associated with a slightly high circumferential resection margin (CRM) positive rate with no significant difference (7.94% vs. 5.37%; risk ratio [RR], 1.13; P = 0.63). There was no significant difference between the two groups in local recurrence (RR, 0.55; P = 0.21). The 3-year overall survival advantage for LS over OS was not statistically significantly different (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; P = 0.11). The 3-year disease-free survival was not significantly different between the two groups (HR, 1.16; P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis suggests that there are no differences between laparoscopic-assisted and open surgery in terms of number of lymph nodes harvested, involvement of CRM, local recurrence, 3-year overall survival, and disease-free survival for rectal cancer. However, more high-quality studies are needed for further analysis due to the small number of included studies.
Authors:
Mei-Jin Huang; Jing-Lin Liang; Hui Wang; Liang Kang; Yan-Hong Deng; Jian-Ping Wang
Related Documents :
9489877 - The influence of open-heart surgery on survival of patients with co-existent surgically...
21210227 - Preoperative serum ca 19-9 level as a predictive factor for recurrence after curative r...
9427017 - Results of pancreatectomy with radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer.
1714967 - Choledochoscopic heat-probe therapy: an adjunctive palliative treatment for intrahepati...
24147157 - Bile duct involvement portends poor prognosis in resected gallbladder carcinoma.
17626407 - Adjuvant chemotherapy and the role of chemotherapy resistance testing for stage i non-s...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2010-12-21
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal of colorectal disease     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1432-1262     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2010 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-12-21     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8607899     Medline TA:  Int J Colorectal Dis     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital (Guangdong Gastrointestinal Hospital), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, People's Republic of China.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) modulation in functional...
Next Document:  Comparative toxicity of oxygenated monoterpenoids in experimental hydroalcoholic lotions to permethr...