Document Detail


Laparoscopic L5-S1 diskectomy: a cost-effective, minimally invasive general surgery--neurosurgery team alternative to laminectomy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  8540649     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Laparoscopic L5-S1 diskectomy (LLD) is a promising new technique for managing disabling pain from herniated lumbar disks. It is unknown, however, whether the clinical results of LLD are superior to those of traditional laminectomy (LAM). This study was undertaken, therefore, in order to compare LLD and LAM in the management of L5-S1 disk herniation unresponsive to conservative treatment measures. Clinical records of 22 patients who underwent 23 LLD procedures and of 23 LAM patients were reviewed with respect to demographics and median age, operative blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, and time of rehabilitation to work/normal activity, as well as postoperative morbidity, recurrent symptoms, long-term functional status, and inhospital patient charges. Two LLD patients had undergone LAM previously, and one had a percutaneous microdiskectomy. All LLD patients had relief of disk pain immediately after surgery. Morbidity after LLD included transient brachial plexus neuropraxia (1), urinary retention (1), and rectus hematoma (1). No LAM complications were reported. Among LLD patients, compared with LAM, median age (34.5 years versus 40 years), estimated blood loss (12 mL versus 68 mL), hospital length of stay (1 day versus 3 days), time to normal activity (17 days versus 79 days) and mean inhospital patient charges ($5,737 +/- 283 versus $7,762 +/- 662) were reduced significantly (P < 0.05). LLD operating time was significantly longer than LAM (210 versus 160 minutes median, P < 0.01). With a median follow-up time of 11.0 months (range, 2 to 23 months) all LLD patients had returned to normal activity, whereas 7 of the LAM group (30%) remained disabled (P < 0.01). Sixty-eight per cent of LLD patients were pain-free during follow-up, compared with 39 per cent of the LAM group (P < 0.05). Sixty-four per cent of LLD patients and 57 per cent of the LAM group needed postoperatively physical therapy. One LLD and 4 LAM patients required reoperation, by LLD and LAM, respectively, for recurrent disk herniation. LLD is a safe, cost-effective, minimally invasive operation for managing disabling L5-S1 disk herniation. Compared with LAM, LLD reduces blood loss, length of stay, rehabilitation time, and patient charges, and improves long-term functional and pain-free status. LLD should be considered as an alternative to LAM for patients with herniated L5-S1 intervertebral disks unresponsive to conservative management.
Authors:
G J Slotman; S C Stein
Related Documents :
8292499 - A physiological oral magnesium supplement does not influence total serum magnesium, lef...
11683749 - Total mesorectal excision preserves male genital function compared with conventional re...
24456239 - Tubeless pcnl using antegrade tether: a randomized study.
365009 - Preoperative prophylactic cephalothin fails to control septic complications of colorect...
2895689 - Atracurium versus vecuronium: a comparison of recovery in outpatient arthroscopy.
8507369 - A study of bone and joint changes secondary to burns.
9370579 - Improving telephone follow-up after ambulatory surgery.
8981889 - Hybrid total hip arthroplasty: 7- to 10-year results.
7918039 - Preliminary study to identify cancer patients at high risk of venous thrombosis followi...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American surgeon     Volume:  62     ISSN:  0003-1348     ISO Abbreviation:  Am Surg     Publication Date:  1996 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1996-02-06     Completed Date:  1996-02-06     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0370522     Medline TA:  Am Surg     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  64-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Division of General Surgery, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Diskectomy / adverse effects,  methods*
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hospital Charges
Humans
Intervertebral Disk Displacement / rehabilitation,  surgery*
Laminectomy
Laparoscopy / adverse effects,  economics,  methods*
Length of Stay / economics
Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery*
Male
Postoperative Complications
Recurrence
Sacrum / surgery*
Treatment Outcome

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The spectrum of Helicobacter pylori in upper gastrointestinal disease.
Next Document:  Technical considerations of the different approaches to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: an analysis of 5...