Document Detail


Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: Initial Experience in 10 Patients.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21542772     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Abstract Background and Purpose: Recent technical advances and a trend toward laparoscopic single incision surgery have led us to explore the feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) hernia repair. Patients and Methods: We present our technique and initial experience with LESS extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in 10 consecutive men with unilateral inguinal hernias. Age range was 43.7 (28-64) years. Mean body mass index was 28 (range 24-30). Six were left inguinal hernias. There were six indirect and four direct hernias. Three patients had undergone previous open appendectomy. Incarcerated or bilateral hernias were excluded from our initial series. All cases were performed by three surgeons who were experienced in conventional totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair as well as experienced in LESS. A literature review of current single-port inguinal hernia repair data is also presented. Results: The mean operative time was 53 minutes (range 45-65 min). The average length of skin incision was 2.8 cm (range 2.3-3.2 cm). No drain was necessary in any of the patients, while no recordable bleeding was observed. There were no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. Hospitalization period was 2 days for all patients. After a limited follow-up of 1 month, there have been no recurrences and no complaints of testicular pain. The results of the current series compare favorably with those found in a literature review. Conclusion: LESS extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is both feasible and safe, although more technically demanding than its conventional laparoscopic counterpart. Although the cosmetic result with the former approach may prove superior, there are standing questions regarding the complications and long-term outcome. Randomized and if possible blinded trials that compare conventional and single-incision laparoscopic hernia repair may help to distinguish the most advantageous technique.
Authors:
Minh Do; Evangelos Liatsikos; John Beatty; Tim Haefner; Ian Dunn; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-5-4
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of endourology / Endourological Society     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1557-900X     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-5-5     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8807503     Medline TA:  J Endourol     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
1 Department of Urology, University of Leipzig , Leipzig, Germany .
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Combined Low-Dose Oral Propranolol and Oral Prednisolone as First-Line Treatment in Periocular Infan...
Next Document:  Floseal Reduces the Incidence of Lymphoceles After Lymphadenectomies in Laparoscopic and Robot-Assis...