Document Detail

Lack of negatively charged residues at the external mouth of kir2.2 channels enable the voltage-dependent block by external mg2+.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  25350118     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Kir channels display voltage-dependent block by cytosolic cations such as Mg2+ and polyamines that causes inward rectification. In fact, cations can regulate K channel activity from both the extracellular and intracellular sides. Previous studies have provided insight into the up-regulation of Kir channel activity by extracellular K+ concentration. In contrast, extracellular Mg2+ has been found to reduce the amplitude of the single-channel current at milimolar concentrations. However, little is known about the molecular mechanism of Kir channel blockade by external Mg2+ and the relationship between the Mg2+ blockade and activity potentiation by permeant K+ ions. In this study, we applied an interactive approach between theory and experiment. Electrophysiological recordings on Kir2.2 and its mutants were performed by heterologous expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Our results confirmed that extracellular Mg2+ could reduce heterologously expressed WT Kir2.2 currents in a voltage dependent manner. The kinetics of inhibition and recovery of Mg2+ exhibit a 3∼4s time constant. Molecular dynamics simulation results revealed a Mg2+ binding site located at the extracellular mouth of Kir2.2 that showed voltage-dependent Mg2+ binding. The mutants, G119D, Q126E and H128D, increased the number of permeant K+ ions and reduced the voltage-dependent blockade of Kir2.2 by extracellular Mg2+.
Junwei Li; Xiaoxiao Xie; Jun Liu; Hui Yu; Suhua Zhang; Yong Zhan; Hailin Zhang; Diomedes E Logothetis; Hailong An
Related Documents :
7692698 - The effect of endothelin, neuropeptide y, calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance...
25350118 - Lack of negatively charged residues at the external mouth of kir2.2 channels enable the...
1317678 - Influence of labor and oxytocin on in vitro leukotriene release by human fetal membrane...
22405998 - Epithelial na(+) channel regulation by cytoplasmic and extracellular factors.
8761008 - Inhibition by multivalent cations of contraction induced by chinese cobra venom cardiot...
2989008 - Rapid purification of calcium-activated protease by calcium-dependent hydrophobic-inter...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2014-10-28
Journal Detail:
Title:  PloS one     Volume:  9     ISSN:  1932-6203     ISO Abbreviation:  PLoS ONE     Publication Date:  2014  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-10-29     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101285081     Medline TA:  PLoS One     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  e111372     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): PLoS One
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): PLoS ONE
Journal ID (publisher-id): plos
Journal ID (pmc): plosone
ISSN: 1932-6203
Publisher: Public Library of Science, San Francisco, USA
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright: 2014 Li et al
Received Day: 19 Month: 6 Year: 2014
Accepted Day: 1 Month: 10 Year: 2014
collection publication date: Year: 2014
Electronic publication date: Day: 28 Month: 10 Year: 2014
Volume: 9 Issue: 10
E-location ID: e111372
PubMed Id: 25350118
ID: 4211740
Publisher Id: PONE-D-14-27143
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111372

Lack of Negatively Charged Residues at the External Mouth of Kir2.2 Channels Enable the Voltage-Dependent Block by External Mg2+ Alternate Title:Surface Acidic Residues Play Key Roles in Permeation of Kir Channels
Junwei Li1
Xiaoxiao Xie1
Jun Liu1
Hui Yu1
Suhua Zhang1
Yong Zhan1*
Hailin Zhang2
Diomedes E. Logothetis3
Hailong An1*
Zhe Zhangedit1 Role: Editor
1Institute of Biophysics, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China
2Key Laboratory of Neural and Vascular Biology, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology for New Drug, Hebei Province, Department of Pharmacology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
3Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
Xuzhou Medical college, China
Correspondence: * E-mail: (HA); (YZ)
[conflict] Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Contributed by footnote: Conceived and designed the experiments: HA DEL HY YZ. Performed the experiments: J. Li J. Liu XX. Analyzed the data: HA J. Li. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HA HZ. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: J. Li SZ YZ. Revised the manuscript: DEL HZ HA YZ.


Inwardly-rectifying potassium (Kir) channels play key physiological roles, such as in the control of heart rate, stabilization of the resting membrane potential and regulation of membrane excitability [1][5]. Kir channels are named for their ability to pass inward currents more easily than outward currents, a property known as inward rectification, which is the result of voltage-dependent block by cytosolic cations such as Mg2+ and polyamines [1], [4], [6], [7]. Kir channels are regulated by several factors, some of which are shared by family members (pHi, lipids), and some that are specific for subfamily members (nucleotides, G-protein, intracellular Na+ and extracellular K+) [8].

All Kir channels are tetrameric, with each subunit composed of cytoplasmic C- and N-terminal domains connected by two transmembrane helix domains (M1 and M2) that are linked by a P loop that forms the selectivity filter, a pore helix and a extracellular ‘turret’ loop (a re-entrant ‘turret’ loop). The selectivity filter at the extracellular mouth of the pore could also serve as a gating element [9]. Structural and computational evidence has shown that the K+ -channel selectivity filter consists of five binding sites (S0–S4) with 2–3 sites occupied at any given time, protecting against a collapse of the filter [10][14]. Specific residues in the outer mouth of the Kir channel might constitute a functional K+ sensor that could permit the channel to regulate its activity in response to changes in extracellular K+[15][17]. Conduction through Kir2.1 is increased by negative surface charges at outer mouth of the pore originating from glutamate residues at position 153 [15]. Surface charges have also been shown to affect channel conductance in a variety of ion channels, such as neuronal Na+ channels [18], Ca2+ -activated K+ channel (BK) channels [19], and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (NAChR) [20], presumably by influencing the concentration of permeant ions at the outer mouth [21].

It has been hypothesized that extracellular K+ interacts with Kir channels and subsequently increases channel open probability [22][24]. Direct activation of K channels by K+ has been proposed as an explanation for the increase in K+ channel activity (in various types of K+ channel) caused by increased [K+]o[22][26]. Outward current of Kir2.1 is larger at higher [K+]o, because single-channel conductance is elevated at higher [K+]o[27]. Kir1.1 channels are also activated by [K+]o in the millimolar range [16], [28]. Mg2+ added to the extracellular solution reduced the amplitude of the single-channel currents of Kir1.1 channel [29], [30]. Biermans and colleagues (1987) showed that removing divalent cations from the external solution reduced the extent of inactivation of the inwardly rectifying K+ channels and silmilarly in heterologously expressed Kir1.1 [31], [32]. Blockage of Kir channels, such as Kir1.1, Kir2.1 or Kir3.1/3.4, by external Mg2+ was also reduced by increased extracellular K+[29], [32], [33]. The effects of Mg2+ are antagonized by K+ in a manner which suggests that K+ competes with Mg2+ for an external inactivation site [30], [33]. However, the detailed mechanism by which permeant K+ ions elevate the function of K channels is not clear.

In this study, we identified that external Mg2+ can reduce the inward currents of Kir2.2 in a voltage-dependent way. Kir2.2 is one of two Kir mammalian channels (the other being Kir3.2) for which more complete crystal structures have been obtained for transmembrane and cytosolic domains [34][36]. MD (Molecular Dynamics) simulations show that one Mg2+ stays at the mouth of the selectivity filter, which causes a reduction of inward currents of Kir2.2. Through mutagenesis data and MD simulations we demonstrate that negative residues at the outer mouth of the pore collect permeant ions, i.e. K+, which reduce the voltage-dependent blockade of inward currents by extracellular Mg2+ by electrostatic repulsion.

Materials and Methods
Molecular Biology and preparation of Xenopus oocytes

Complementary DNA coding Kir2.2 was inserted into the pGEMHE plasmid vector. Site-specific mutants were produced by Pfu DNA polymerase with a QuickChange kit (Stratagene). Sequences were confirmed by DNA sequencing. cRNA was produced with T7 RNA polymerase using a kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Recombinant Kir2.2 and its mutants were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. cRNAs of the various Kir channels and their mutants were injected in the range of 0.5–1 ng/oocyte depending on the functional expression level of each channel.

The care of Xenopus laevis was in accordance with the guideline of the Institute of Experimental Animal Sciences, Hebei Medical University. The protocol was approved by the Animal Experiment Committee of Hebei Medical University. Ovarian lobes were dissected from adult female Xenopus laevis deeply anesthetized by ice for 30–40 min. A few lobes of ovaries were removed after a small abdominal incision (∼5 mm). The surgical incision was then sutured and the frogs were allowed to recover from anesthesia. The Xenopus oocytes were treated with collagenase (2 mg/ml, Sigma, Type II) in OR2 solution containing (in mM): 82.5 NaCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 KCl and 5 HEPES, pH 7.4 with NaOH. Oocytes were digested for 90–120 min at room temperature (∼24°C). Isolated oocytes were stored at 18°C in ND96 solution, which contains 96 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, HEPES 10 mM, sodium pyruvate 2.5 mM, and 50 mg/l Gentamicin. Experiments were performed with the wild-type and three mutant Kir2.2 channels. A Kir2.2 channel mutant, in which three outer vestibule amino acids (Gly119, Gln126 and His128) were changed to negatively charged residues, was studied in the Xenopus laevis oocyte system.


Whole-cell current recordings in Xenopus laevis oocytes were performed 1–2 days after cDNA injection using a two-electrode voltage clamp. Current recordings were conducted at room temperature (22–24°C) using a GeneClamp 500B amplifier (Axon Instruments). Glass microelectrodes were filled with 3 M KCl dissolved in 1% agarose to prevent the leakage of KCl into the oocytes. The electrodes had a resistance less than 1 MΩ. Oocytes were bathed in a HK solution (in mM) (96 KCl, 1 MgCl2 and 10 HEPES, pH 7.4 with KOH) or HK-5EGTA (in mM) (96 KCl, 5 EGTA and 10 HEPES, pH 7.4 with KOH). Oocytes were clamped to a holding potential of −70 mV, and currents were recorded during 50-ms voltage steps ranging from −70 mV to +70 mV in 10-mV increments.

Data analysis

All data acquisition and analysis were done with pClamp9.2, pClampfit9.2 (Axon Instruments) and Origi8.0 (OriginLab Corp) software. Each experiment shown or described was performed on 5–8 oocytes of the same batch. A minimum of 2–3 batches of oocytes was tested for each experiment shown. All data are shown as mean ± SEM. The degree of inhibition (γ) was calculated from the current according to the following equation γ = (I0–If)/I0, where I0 is the initial current, If is final current.

Homology modeling

The crystallographic structure of the chicken Kir2.2 (PDB code: 3JYC) [36] was used as a template for modeling human Kir2.2 (88% sequence homology to cKir2.2). The target sequence (hKir2.2) was taken from Genbank ( Modeling was done with SWISS-MODEL webserver [37][39]. The model was evaluated with QMEAN (The QMEAN4 score is a composite score consisting of a linear combination of 4 statistical potential terms (estimated model reliability between 0–1) [40]. The pseudo-energies of the contributing terms are given their Z-scores with respect to scores obtained for high-resolution experimental structures of similar size solved by X-ray crystallography) [40]. The QMEAN4 score was 0.557 and QMEAN Z-score was −3.507. The mutant channels were constructed by substituting the WT side chain with the specified side chains. Each model was compared to its template to verify that the modeling step had not significantly altered backbone and side chain conformations.

Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations

In preparation for the simulations, two K+ ions were placed at positions S1 and S3 and water molecules were placed at positions S0, S2, and S4 in the selectivity filter. The hKir2.2 channels [wild-type (WT) and four mutants] were embedded in a fully hydrated, 100 Å×100 Å palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycerol-phosphatidylcholine (POPC) bilayer. The water molecules were described using the TIP3 model. We had built atomic models according to addition of different solvent. The systems were made electrically neutral by addition Mg2+ and Cl of 150 mM, K+ and Cl of 150 mM and Mg2+ of 1.5 mM, K+ and Cl of 150 mM, respectively (A total of ∼143,000 atoms). The solvated systems gradually relaxed using a standard procedure: the entire protein and solution were fixed for 5 ns, enabling reorganization of the lipid; the solvent and the lipids equilibrated for 5 ns with only the protein restrained; finally the backbone atoms of cytoplasmic domain and two transmembrane helices (residues N44-A106, F134-L148, V159-A372) were only restrained with a harmonic constant k = 2.0 kcal/(mol Å), which was maintained to limit structural changes within this part of protein, though side chains, extracellular domain (residues V107-A133, R149-A158) and solution were left completely free for 15 ns.

MD simulations with explicit solvent and different ions were carried out on a total of 7 separate systems of hkir2.2 and mutants using NAMD [41] ( with the CHARMM27 force field [42]. All simulations had the following characteristic: (a) Three-dimensional periodic boundary conditions were applied and long-range electrostatic forces were calculated using the particle mesh Ewald (PME) [43], [44] approach (108×108×200 grid points) with a grid spacing of ∼1 Å in each dimension; (b) The Langevin dynamics scheme was used to keep the temperature constant at 310 K. The Nosé-Hoover-Langevin piston was used to maintain the constant pressure at 1 atm; (c) The cutoff radius for Lennard Jones interactions was 12 Å, with a smooth switching function starting at 10 Å and a nonbonded ‘‘pairlist’’ distance of 13.5 Å; (d) A time-step of 2 fs was used to integrate the equations of motion and a reversible multiple time-step algorithm of 4 fs was used for the electrostatic forces and 2 fs for short-range, nonbonded forces. Overall, ∼175 ns of simulation time was generated and ∼155,000 CPU hours were used in calculating the results in this study.

The time series of the (x,y,z) position of all ions were generated using Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) [45]. To calculate the densities, the radial position was calculated as R  =  (x2+ y2)1/2 at every frame. The time series was then binned into 1 Å increments of ΔR and ΔZ. The number of counts in each bin was divided by the total number of frames in the time series and by the volume element because the radial volume increases as R increases. The volume element is the cylindrical annulus calculated at the center of the ith bin as ΔVi  =  π (Ri+12+ Ri2) ΔZ. The resultant densities are in units of ions/Å3.

Molecular visualization, system setup and analysis were done with the VMD software package.

Extracellular Mg2+ reduces the inward currents of Kir2.2, but not Kir2.1, in a voltage dependent way

In these experiments, whole-cell currents were recorded from oocytes expressing either WT or mutants of Kir2.2 channels using two-electrode voltage clamp. Starting with a 50-ms test pulse to −70 mV, while conditioning pulses from −70 mV to 70 mV were applied to the oocytes expressing Kir2.2 channel in steps of 10 mV (2s duration). There are 15 sweeps for each experiment. The first 50-ms test pulse (−70 mV) is going before the conditioning pulses. As a control, the test pulses follow the conditioning pulses (Fig. 1A). Evoked by this protocol, the currents of Kir2.2 at various test potentials showed a voltage dependent inhibition with 1 mM extracellular Mg2+ (Fig. 1B and D). The inhibited currents reached peak values after the oocytes were held for 2 s at −70 mV. Removing the Mg2+ in bath solution by 5 mM EGTA also eliminated voltage-dependent inhibition of Kir2.2 channels, indicating that it was the Mg2+ that was responsible for the voltage-dependent reduction of the Kir2.2 current (Fig. 1C and D). Under the same experimental conditions, whole-cell currents of Kir2.1 were also measured. There were no voltage dependent changes observed for Kir2.1 currents (Fig. 1E and F). From these results we concluded that external Mg2+ could inhibit inwardly rectifying currents of Kir2.2 channels in a voltage-dependent way.

External Mg2+ ions bind to the Kir2.2 channel to block inward currents

To further investigate the mechanism of inhibition of Kir2.2 currents by extracellular Mg2+, we analyzed the kinetics of the current inhibition and recovery processes. Figure 2A, C and E show the protocol, current inhibition and inhibition kinetics induced by wash-in of external Mg2+ ions at −70 mV. Figure 2B, D and F show the protocol, current recovery level and kinetics when the membrane was held at positive 60 mV. Both the inhibition and recovery show comparable time constants 4 s and 3 s, respectively (Fig. 2G). We speculated that the external Mg2+ could bind directly to the outer mouth of the Kir2.2 channel to cause the rapid inhibition of the inward K+ current.

Binding site of extracellular Mg2+

To determine the putative Mg2+ binding sites, we performed five Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations with the Kir2.2 channel. One of Simulations were carried out in 150 mM MgCl2. Figure 3A shows the initial structure in which the Mg2+ ions randomly scatter at the outside of the Kir2.2 channel. During this MD simulation, the external Mg2+ ions were rearranged. One of the Mg2+ ions moved to and was stabilized at the mouth of the selectivity filter (SF) (Fig. 3B, and C), which could block the channel and reduce K+ inward current. We carried out another four simulations of the Kir2.2 channel in ∼150 mM K+, with ∼1.5 mM Mg2+ at the outside membrane (Fig. 3D and 4A). After the equilibrated bulk solution, the external ions were rearranged. There are two of four simulations in which the Mg2+ can bind at S0 binding site of the outer mouth of the pore (Fig. 3E, and F). The other two simulations show that one of the K+ occupied the Mg2+ binding site at S0 site (Fig. 4). Our data show that in physiological concentration, Mg2+ and K+ compete to bind at S0 site. These results suggested that entry to the external mouth of the channel pore could underlie the extracellular Mg2+ blockade. To determine potential key residues which could mediate the voltage-dependent blockade of Kir2.2 by Mg2+ ions, we aligned the amino acid sequences (Fig. 5A) and compare the 3D structures (Fig. 5B) of Kir2.1 and Kir2.2. As shown in Figures 5A and B, there are two sets of negatively charged residues in Kir2.1 forming two concentric rings (seen from the outside to the inside as E125-N127 and D152–E153). However, in Kir2.2 there is only one negatively charged ring in the outer mouth of SF in Kir2.2 (Fig. 5B), with residues Q126 and H128 in place of the Kir2.1 E125 and N127 (Fig. 5A and C). The structure suggested that the Kir2.2 (G119) residue is positioned on top of the Q126 and H128 residues. To examine whether the negative charge of the Kir2.1 (E125) caused the difference between the Kir2.1 and 2.2 in the Mg2+ -induced voltage-dependent block, we designed three single mutants of Kir2.2, G119D, Q126E, H128D and the triplet mutant (G119D, Q126E and H128D).

Mutants weaken the voltage-dependent blockage of Kir2.2 by external Mg2+

Next, we tested whether mutations of the residues suggested by the MD simulations affected the voltage-dependent block of Kir2.2 currents by external Mg2+. We defined the degree of inhibition (γ) as γ = (I0–If)/I0, where I0 and If correspond to the initial and final currents of Kir2.2 or its mutants. The Mg2+-induced degree of inhibition (γ) of inward K+ current at −70 mV (Fig. 6A and B) was assessed. Figure 6C shows that the degree of inhibition of WT, G119D, Q126E, H128D and the triple mutant (G119D, Q126E and H128D) induced by extracellular Mg2+ were (54±8)%, (29±5)%, (33±3)%, (44±2)% and (25±2)%, respectively. These data showed that the mutants significantly diminished the voltage-dependent block of Kir2.2 by external Mg2+.

Mutations increase the collection of K+ ions at the outer mouth of the SF

To better understand how the outer ring mutants decreased the Mg2+-induced block of inward K+ current in Kir2.2, we performed MD simulations on the WT and the mutants of Kir2.2 channel with randomized initial configurations of 0.15 M KCl. Figure 7 shows density plots of the WT (Fig. 7A) single mutants, G119D, Q126E, H128D (Fig. 6B–D, respectively) and the triple mutant (G119D, Q126E and H128D) (Fig. 7E), revealing that the negatively charged mutants (especially the triple mutant) increased the number of permeant K+ ions at the outer mouth of the channel. The density analysis is consistent with the electrophysiological data (see Fig. 6). These results lead us to conclude that the negatively charged residues at the outer mouth of Kir2.2 channel increase the density of permeant K+ ions at the outer mouth of the selectivity filter which repel Mg2+ from binding the channel reducing its block of inward K+ current.

Inward currents of Kir2.2 but not Kir2.1 show Mg2+-induced voltage-dependent inhibition

In this study, we identified that external Mg2+ ions can inhibit inward currents through Kir2.2 but not Kir2.1 in a voltage-dependent manner. However, our data is different from a previous study Murata and colleagues [46], which showed that external Mg2+ Kir2.1 currents but had weak effects on Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 currents. Murata et al. tested the effect for external Mg2+ on Kir2.1, Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 and showed that the extracellular Mg2+ could reduce the inward currents of Kir2.1 in a dose-dependent manner. They recorded the currents with a step-pulse protocol, from −150 to +20 mV in 10 mV increments for 0, 1, 3, 10 mM [Mg2+]o. There was significant inhibition at −150 mV but a very weak effect at −70 mV of Kir2.1. We focused on the inhibition of the inward currents of Kir2.2 held at −70 mV with 1 mM [Mg2+]o.

Extracellular Mg2+ decreases affinity for K+ by binding with the channel

Intracellular cations, such as Mg2+ and polyamines, can block the outward currents of Kir channels under depolarized membrane potentials, a phenomenon referred to as inward rectification [4]. In this study, we report that under polarized membrane potentials, physiological concentrations of external Mg2+ (1 mM) reduced the inward currents of Kir2.2, but not Kir2.1. Depolarized potentials facilitated channel recovery from the Mg2+-induced block. Our findings suggest that the block of extracellular Mg2+ on inward currents through Kir2.2 channels displays voltage dependence. As reported by a previous study, the extracellular divalent cations (Ca2+ and Mg2+) can increase inactivation of Kir1.1 [32] and reduce the single-channel currents through Kir1.2 channels [29]. However, the detailed molecular mechanism of the regulation of Kir channels by external cations is not known. Extracellular divalent cation (Ca2+, Ba2+ and Mg2+) interaction with the outer mouth of the pore, just external to the selectivity filter, have been reported to decrease Kir currents [47], [48]. Following the idea that the Mg2+ ions may bind at the extracellular mouth of the channel, reducing the affinity of the channel for K+ and thus block K+ currents through Kir2.2, we performed MD simulations and found that Mg2+ ions can be stabilized at the external mouth of the Kir2.2 channel.

We found that differences in the voltage-dependent Mg2+ block between different Kir channels may be due to extracellular negatively charged amino acid residues present at the external mouth of the pore (Fig. 5A). The negatively charged residue (E153) contributes to the conductance properties of Kir2.1 channels by acting as a surface charge [15]. In the presence of divalents, the E125Q and E153C mutants of Kir2.1 channels showed decreased single-channel conductance compared to the WT channels [15], [46]. The negative charges of Kir1.1 channel stabilize external K+ in the selectivity filter or at the S0-K binding site just outside the filter [32]. The negatively charged residue (E125) in an extracellular loop of Kir2.1 facilitates K+ permeation as described previously, the peak currents reduced from 25 to 5 µA by introducing the E125Q mutation [46]. Our MD simulation results demonstrate that the extracellular negatively charged residues can enhance the external K+ accumulation at the outer mouth of the Kir2.2 pore (Fig. 7).

It has been reported that there is interactions between the extracellular blocker Mg2+ and the permeant ions K+. Our results agree with previous reports by showing that extracellular surface negatively charged residues relief the blockage of Mg2+o by increasing the [K+]o. Extracellular Mg2+ can reduce single-channel currents with an affinity that increased as [K+]o decreased [29]. The sensitivity to the block by Mg2+o was increased by lowering extracellular K+ (K+o), suggesting a competitive interaction of Mg2+o and K+o in the Kir2.1 channel [46]. Increased extracellular K+ concentration can inhibit the block of Mg2+o. With Kir2.1 and Kir3.1/Kir3.4, decreasing the extracellular K+ concentration augmented the block which caused by external divalent cations (Ba2+, Mg2+ and Ca2+) [33]. The magnitude of current reduction of Kir1.1 by external Mg2+ increases as the extracellular K+ concentrations decreases [47]. The elimination of a negative charge in the outer mouth of Kir1.1 might decrease Mg2+ and/or K+ affinities for the channel through favorable electrostatic interactions [47].

We conclude proposing a possible mechanism for the block of Kir2 channels by extracellular Mg2+. In this mechanism Mg2+ is stabilized at the external mouth of the Kir2 channel to inhibit K+ entry. This effect is likely to be by direct block of the current rather than an allosteric conformational change. The proposed model is consistent with the relationships between the external Mg2+, K+ and the negatively charged outer mouth of pore. Augmentation of extracellular K+ concentration can decrease the block of Kir channel by extracellular Mg2+ by electrostatic repulsion.

1. Nichols CG,, Lopatin AN, (Year: 1997) Inward rectifier potassium channels. Annual review of physiology59: 171–191
2. Nichols CG,, Makhina EN,, Pearson WL,, Sha Q,, Lopatin AN, (Year: 1996) Inward rectification and implications for cardiac excitability. Circulation research78: 1–78603491
3. Doupnik CA,, Davidson N,, Lester HA, (Year: 1995) The inward rectifier potassium channel family. Current opinion in neurobiology5: 268–2777580148
4. Lopatin AN,, Makhina EN,, Nichols CG, (Year: 1994) Potassium channel block by cytoplasmic polyamines as the mechanism of intrinsic rectification. Nature372: 366–3697969496
5. Ficker E,, Taglialatela M,, Wible BA,, Henley CM,, Brown AM, (Year: 1994) Spermine and spermidine as gating molecules for inward rectifier K+ channels. Science266: 1068–10727973666
6. Matsuda H, (Year: 1991) Magnesium gating of the inwardly rectifying K+ channel. Annual review of physiology53: 289–298
7. Vandenberg CA, (Year: 1987) Inward rectification of a potassium channel in cardiac ventricular cells depends on internal magnesium ions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America84: 2560–25642436236
8. Hibino H,, Inanobe A,, Furutani K,, Murakami S,, Findlay I,, et al. . (Year: 2010) Inwardly rectifying potassium channels: their structure, function, and physiological roles. Physiological reviews90: 291–36620086079
9. Xiao J,, Zhen XG,, Yang J, (Year: 2003) Localization of PIP2 activation gate in inward rectifier K+ channels. Nature neuroscience6: 811–818
10. Berneche S,, Roux B, (Year: 2003) A microscopic view of ion conduction through the K+ channel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America100: 8644–864812837936
11. Zhou Y,, Morais-Cabral JH,, Kaufman A,, MacKinnon R, (Year: 2001) Chemistry of ion coordination and hydration revealed by a K+ channel-Fab complex at 2.0 A resolution. Nature414: 43–4811689936
12. Berneche S,, Roux B, (Year: 2001) Energetics of ion conduction through the K+ channel. Nature414: 73–7711689945
13. Doyle DA,, Morais Cabral J,, Pfuetzner RA,, Kuo A,, Gulbis JM,, et al. . (Year: 1998) The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science280: 69–779525859
14. Zhang YY,, Sackin H,, Palmer LG, (Year: 2006) Localization of the pH gate in Kir1.1 channels. Biophysical journal91: 2901–290916891366
15. D'Avanzo N,, Cho HC,, Tolokh I,, Pekhletski R,, Tolokh I,, et al. . (Year: 2005) Conduction through the inward rectifier potassium channel, Kir2.1, is increased by negatively charged extracellular residues. The Journal of general physiology125: 493–50315824191
16. Sackin H,, Syn S,, Palmer LG,, Choe H,, Walters DE, (Year: 2001) Regulation of ROMK by extracellular cations. Biophysical journal80: 683–69711159436
17. Sackin H,, Nanazashvili M,, Li H,, Palmer LG,, Yang L, (Year: 2012) Residues at the outer mouth of Kir1.1 determine K-dependent gating. Biophysical journal102: 2742–275022735524
18. Worley JF 3rd,, French RJ,, Krueger BK, (Year: 1986) Trimethyloxonium modification of single batrachotoxin-activated sodium channels in planar bilayers. Changes in unit conductance and in block by saxitoxin and calcium. The Journal of general physiology87: 327–3492419487
19. MacKinnon R,, Latorre R,, Miller C, (Year: 1989) Role of surface electrostatics in the operation of a high-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel. Biochemistry28: 8092–80992605175
20. Konno T,, Busch C,, Von Kitzing E,, Imoto K,, Wang F,, et al. . (Year: 1991) Rings of anionic amino acids as structural determinants of ion selectivity in the acetylcholine receptor channel. Proceedings Biological sciences/The Royal Society244: 69–791679551
21. Apell HJ,, Bamberg E,, Alpes H,, Lauger P, (Year: 1977) Formation of ion channels by a negatively charged analog of gramicidin A. The Journal of membrane biology. 31: 171–188
22. Claydon TW,, Makary SY,, Dibb KM,, Boyett MR, (Year: 2004) K+ activation of kir3.1/kir3.4 and kv1.4 K+ channels is regulated by extracellular charges. Biophysical journal87: 2407–241815454439
23. Kubo Y, (Year: 1996) Effects of extracellular cations and mutations in the pore region on the inward rectifier K+ channel IRK1. Receptors & channels4: 73–838865359
24. Pennefather P,, Oliva C,, Mulrine N, (Year: 1992) Origin of the potassium and voltage dependence of the cardiac inwardly rectifying K-current (IK1). Biophysical journal61: 448–4621547332
25. Lopez-Barneo J,, Hoshi T,, Heinemann SH,, Aldrich RW, (Year: 1993) Effects of external cations and mutations in the pore region on C-type inactivation of Shaker potassium channels. Receptors & channels1: 61–718081712
26. Pardo LA,, Heinemann SH,, Terlau H,, Ludewig U,, Lorra C,, et al. . (Year: 1992) Extracellular K+ specifically modulates a rat brain K+ channel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America89: 2466–24701549610
27. Liu TA,, Chang HK,, Shieh RC, (Year: 2011) Extracellular K+ elevates outward currents through Kir2.1 channels by increasing single-channel conductance. Biochimica et biophysica acta1808: 1772–177821376013
28. Doi T,, Fakler B,, Schultz JH,, Schulte U,, Brandle U,, et al. . (Year: 1996) Extracellular K+ and intracellular pH allosterically regulate renal Kir1.1 channels. The Journal of biological chemistry271: 17261–172668663367
29. Yang L,, Frindt G,, Palmer LG, (Year: 2010) Magnesium modulates ROMK channel-mediated potassium secretion. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN21: 2109–211621030597
30. Elam TR,, Lansman JB, (Year: 1995) The role of Mg2+ in the inactivation of inwardly rectifying K+ channels in aortic endothelial cells. The Journal of general physiology105: 463–4847608654
31. Biermans G,, Vereecke J,, Carmeliet E, (Year: 1987) The mechanism of the inactivation of the inward-rectifying K current during hyperpolarizing steps in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes. Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology410: 604–6132453018
32. Sackin H,, Nanazashvili M,, Li H,, Palmer LG,, Yang L, (Year: 2011) Modulation of Kir1.1 inactivation by extracellular Ca and Mg. Biophysical journal100: 1207–121521354393
33. Owen JM,, Quinn CC,, Leach R,, Findlay JB,, Boyett MR, (Year: 1999) Effect of extracellular cations on the inward rectifying K+ channels Kir2.1 and Kir3.1/Kir3.4. Experimental physiology84: 471–48810362846
34. Whorton MR,, MacKinnon R, (Year: 2011) Crystal structure of the mammalian GIRK2 K+ channel and gating regulation by G proteins, PIP2, and sodium. Cell147: 199–20821962516
35. Hansen SB,, Tao X,, MacKinnon R, (Year: 2011) Structural basis of PIP2 activation of the classical inward rectifier K+ channel Kir2.2. Nature477: 495–49821874019
36. Tao X,, Avalos JL,, Chen J,, MacKinnon R, (Year: 2009) Crystal structure of the eukaryotic strong inward-rectifier K+ channel Kir2.2 at 3.1 A resolution. Science326: 1668–167420019282
37. Arnold K,, Bordoli L,, Kopp J,, Schwede T, (Year: 2006) The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics22: 195–20116301204
38. Kiefer F,, Arnold K,, Kunzli M,, Bordoli L,, Schwede T, (Year: 2009) The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources. Nucleic acids research37: D387–39218931379
39. Guex N,, Peitsch MC,, Schwede T, (Year: 2009) Automated comparative protein structure modeling with SWISS-MODEL and Swiss-PdbViewer: a historical perspective. Electrophoresis30Suppl 1S162–17319517507
40. Benkert P,, Biasini M,, Schwede T, (Year: 2011) Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models. Bioinformatics27: 343–35021134891
41. Phillips JC,, Braun R,, Wang W,, Gumbart J,, Tajkhorshid E,, et al. . (Year: 2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. Journal of computational chemistry26: 1781–180216222654
42. MacKerell AD,, Bashford D,, Bellott M,, Dunbrack R,, Evanseck J,, et al. . (Year: 1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B102: 3586–361624889800
43. Essmann U,, Perera L,, Berkowitz ML,, Darden T,, Lee H,, et al. . (Year: 1995) A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. Journal of Chemical Physics103: 8577–8593
44. Darden T,, York D,, Pedersen L, (Year: 1993) Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅ log (N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. The Journal of chemical physics98: 10089
45. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. Journal of molecular graphics 14: 33–38, 27–38.
46. Murata Y,, Fujiwara Y,, Kubo Y, (Year: 2002) Identification of a site involved in the block by extracellular Mg(2+) and Ba(2+) as well as permeation of K(+) in the Kir2.1 K(+) channel. The Journal of physiology544: 665–67712411513
47. Yang L,, Edvinsson J,, Sackin H,, Palmer LG, (Year: 2012) Ion selectivity and current saturation in inward-rectifier K+ channels. The Journal of general physiology139: 145–15722291146
48. Leung YM,, Kwan CY,, Daniel EE, (Year: 2000) Block of inwardly rectifying K+ currents by extracellular Mg2+ and Ba2+ in bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology78: 751–75611007539


[Figure ID: pone-0111372-g001]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111372.g001.
Figure 1  External Mg2+ voltage-dependently blocks the currents through Kir2.2 but not Kir2.1.

Whole-cell currents were recorded by two-electrode voltage clamp. (A) Protocol used for activating the currents. The protocol contains a series of 2s-long sweeps. Each sweep consisted of a 50 ms test pulse to −70 mV and 1950 ms conditional pulse from −70 mV to +70 mV in 10 mV steps. There are 15 sweeps for each experiment. The first 50-ms test pulse (−70 mV) is going before the conditional pulses. As a control, the test pulses follow the conditional pulses. (B) and (C) are the representative currents Kir2.2 recorded with and without Mg2+. (D) is the relationship between the currents of Kir2.2 recorded at −70 mV and the corresponding conditional voltage. The data recorded with 1 mM Mg2+ and 0 Mg2+ are shown as black and red lines, respectively. (E) is the representative currents Kir2.1 recorded with Mg2+. (F) is the relationship between the currents of Kir2.1 recorded at −70 mV and the corresponding conditional voltage. Data represent means ± SEM for 7 experiments.

[Figure ID: pone-0111372-g002]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111372.g002.
Figure 2  The kinetics of inhibition and recovery induced by Mg2+ wash-in or wash-out.

(A) and (B) are the protocols used to inhibit, activate the currents, respectively. The protocols will repeat until the currents reach the plateau. (C) and (D) are the representative current traces of inhibition and recovery processes. Δ and * show the currents of initial and final traces. (E) and (F) are the inhibition and recovery kinetics. Δ and * show current corresponding to C and D. (G) shows the summary data of the time constants corresponding to E and F. Data represent means ± SEM for 7 experiments.

[Figure ID: pone-0111372-g003]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111372.g003.
Figure 3  Mg2+ ion binds at the S0 site of Kir2.2 both in high and physiological conditions.

Distributions of extracellular K+ and Mg2+ ions of the initial (A and D) and final (B and E) snapshots. Mg2+ and K+ ions are represented by yellow and red spheres, respectively. In panel B and E, the blue spheres represent the binding Mg2+ ions. (C and F) Evolution of the distance (between the center of the selective filter and each Mg2+) against time (5–25 ns). The total simulation time was 25 ns. In the first 5 ns, the ions are fixed for equilibration of the lipids. The No. 3 Mg 2+ is corresponding to the bound Mg2+.

[Figure ID: pone-0111372-g004]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111372.g004.
Figure 4  K+ ions compete with Mg2+ to bind at the S0 site.

Distributions of extracellular K+ and Mg2+ ions of the initial (A) and final (B) snapshots. Mg2+ and K+ ions are represented by yellow and red spheres, respectively. (C) Evolution of the distance (between the center of the selective filter and Mg2+) against time (5–25 ns). The total simulation time was 25 ns. In the first 5 ns, the ions are fixed for equilibration of the lipids.

[Figure ID: pone-0111372-g005]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111372.g005.
Figure 5  There is only one negative ring in Kir2.2 but two in Kir2.1.

Sequence alignments for Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 (A) and the schematic positions of the negative rings (B). There are two negative rings in Kir2.1 formed by three negatively charged and one polar amino acid side chains which are E125 & N127 (highlighted in red circle), D152 & E153 (highlighted in blue circle). Whereas, Kir2.2 channel lacks one of the two negatively charged rings (red dotted line circle, bottom right). For clarity, only two of four subunits are shown. (C) Ribbon model of the extracellular side of two subunits of Kir2.2 showing the positions of G119 (purple), Q126 (red) and H128 (red).

[Figure ID: pone-0111372-g006]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111372.g006.
Figure 6  The mutants of Kir2.2 weaken the external Mg2+ blockage.

(A) The protocol used for recording the degree of inhibition which was hyperpolarization from 0 mV holding potential to −70 mV for 500 ms, and then stepped to 0 mV. (B) The representative currents trace in Kir2.2 channel. (C) degree of Inhibition (γ = (I0–If)/I0) for wild type (WT), WT+EGTA, G119D, Q126E, H128D and Triplet mutant (G119D, Q126E and H128D) channels.

[Figure ID: pone-0111372-g007]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111372.g007.
Figure 7  Extracellular K+ density distribution in Kir2.2 and its mutants.

The simulations of the Kir2.2 and its mutants were carried out in 0.15 M K+. The extracellular K+ density plots are shown as functions of radial distance from the pore axis (R = (x2+y2)1/2) and height in the simulation box (Z). K+ density distribution in Kir2.2 WT (A), G119D (B), Q126E (C), H128D (D) and Triplet mutant (G119D, Q126E and H128D) channels (E).

Article Categories:
  • Research Article
Article Categories:
  • Biology and Life Sciences
    • Biochemistry
      • Proteins
        • Ion Channels
          • Potassium Channels
            • Inward-Rectifier Potassium Channels
    • Biophysics

Previous Document:  Use of stopped-flow fluorescence and labeled nucleotides to analyze the ATP turnover cycle of kinesi...
Next Document:  Learning accurate and interpretable models based on regularized random forests regression.