Document Detail

LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23000324     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
OBJECTIVE: High-quality chest-compressions are of paramount importance for survival and good neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. However, even healthcare professionals have difficulty performing effective chest-compressions, and quality may be further reduced during transport. We compared a mechanical chest-compression device (Lund University Cardiac Assist System [LUCAS]; Jolife, Lund, Sweden) and manual chest-compressions in a simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenario during helicopter rescue. METHODS: Twenty-five advanced life support-certified paramedics were enrolled for this prospective, randomized, crossover study. A modified Resusci Anne manikin was employed. Thirty minutes of training was allotted to both LUCAS and manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Thereafter, every candidate performed the same scenario twice, once with LUCAS and once with manual CPR. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of correct chest-compressions relative to total chest-compressions. RESULTS: LUCAS compared to manual chest-compressions were more frequently correct (99% vs 59%, P < .001) and were more often performed correctly regarding depth (99% vs 79%, P < .001), pressure point (100% vs 79%, P < .001) and pressure release (100% vs 97%, P = .001). Hands-off time was shorter in the LUCAS than in the manual group (46 vs 130 seconds, P < .001). Time until first defibrillation was longer in the LUCAS group (112 vs 49 seconds, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: During this simulated cardiac arrest scenario in helicopter rescue LUCAS compared to manual chest-compressions increased CPR quality and reduced hands-off time, but prolonged the time interval to the first defibrillation. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm potential benefits of LUCAS CPR in helicopter rescue.
Gabriel Putzer; Patrick Braun; Andrea Zimmermann; Florian Pedross; Giacomo Strapazzon; Hermann Brugger; Peter Paal
Related Documents :
1510264 - Blood flow and tissue oxygen pressures of liver and pancreas in rats: effects of volati...
9860404 - Modulation of intravariceal pressure with pentoxifylline: a possible new approach in th...
24399244 - Low coronary microcirculatory resistance associated with profound hypotension during in...
24381094 - Timing positive-pressure ventilation during chest compression: the key to improving the...
1184514 - Effects of hypoxic and co hypoxia on isolated hearts.
8025744 - Determinants of maximal transdiaphragmatic pressure in adults with cystic fibrosis.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-9-20
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American journal of emergency medicine     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1532-8171     ISO Abbreviation:  Am J Emerg Med     Publication Date:  2012 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-9-24     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8309942     Medline TA:  Am J Emerg Med     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstraße 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address:
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Decision support system in prehospital care: a randomized controlled simulation study.
Next Document:  Prospective study of violence against ED workers.