Document Detail


Knowledge of hepatocellular carcinoma screening guidelines and clinical practices among gastroenterologists.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20978844     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Screening of high-risk patients for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may result in early diagnosis and improved outcomes. Our aim was to assess gastroenterologists' knowledge of HCC management guidelines established by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and usual clinical practice.
METHODS: We surveyed gastroenterologists attending two gastroenterology board review courses regarding their knowledge of HCC screening guidelines and usual practice of screening for HCC. Practices were compared and adherence to the 2005 published HCC guidelines was assessed.
RESULTS: The median age of gastroenterology attending physicians (n = 160) was 41 years, and 75% were men with a median of 11.5 years of practice. A total of 79% of respondents correctly identified the high-risk patients who qualify for HCC screening. Most gastroenterologists correctly identified the screening methods (88.5%) and screening interval (98%). Among those who knew guideline recommendations (i.e., correct identification and certainty of guideline recommendations), 100% reported that they followed the guideline recommendation in their own practices. Regarding the management of abnormal test, 31% of gastroenterologists did not identify that referral for liver transplantation is the recommended management strategy for small HCC in a Child B patient with cirrhosis. The number of years in clinical practice (p = 0.30) and involvement in a malpractice suit (p = 0.34) did not affect the practice patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: Most gastroenterologists correctly identified the common high-risk scenarios, methods, and interval of HCC screening as recommended by AASLD. Gastroenterologists who knew the HCC guidelines applied them in their own practice. However, approximately one-quarter do not know the appropriate management of a positive result, thereby likely hampering the overall effectiveness of screening.
Authors:
Pratima Sharma; Sameer D Saini; Latoya B Kuhn; Joel H Rubenstein; Darrell S Pardi; Jorge A Marrero; Philip S Schoenfeld
Related Documents :
19217594 - Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of american college of obstetricians and gy...
18465174 - The impact of concordant and discordant conditions on the quality of care for hyperlipi...
12405894 - Clinicians' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review.
10583044 - Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma. british association of dermatolo...
9193994 - Budget management.
9418794 - Usefulness of a patient library in a suburban general practice.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-10-27
Journal Detail:
Title:  Digestive diseases and sciences     Volume:  56     ISSN:  1573-2568     ISO Abbreviation:  Dig. Dis. Sci.     Publication Date:  2011 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-01-28     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7902782     Medline TA:  Dig Dis Sci     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  569-77     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, 3912, Taubman Center, SPC 5362, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA, pratimas@med.umich.edu.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Computer-Assisted Brush-Biopsy Analysis for the Detection of Dysplasia in a High-Risk Barrett's Esop...
Next Document:  African American Clergy: What are Their Perceptions of Pastoral Care and Pastoral Counseling?