Document Detail

Knock-down of core proteins regulating microRNA biogenesis has no effect on sensitivity of lung cancer cells to ionizing radiation.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22479364     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Recent studies underline the important role of microRNAs (miRNA) in the development of lung cancer. The main regulators of miRNA biogenesis are the ribonucleases Drosha, Dicer and Ago2. Here the role of core proteins of miRNA biogenesis machinery in the response of human non-small and small cell lung carcinoma cell lines to treatment with ionizing radiation was assessed. We found that Drosha and Dicer were expressed at higher levels in radioresistant but not in sensitive cell lines. However, down-regulation of either Dicer or Drosha had no effect on the sensitivity of cells to irradiation. Elimination of components of the RNA-induced silencing complex Ago2 and Tudor staphylococcal nuclease also did not sensitize cells to the same treatment. Thus, modulation of miRNA biogenesis machinery is not sufficient to increase the radiosensitivity of lung tumors and other strategies are required to combat lung cancer.
Authors:
Olga Surova; Nadeem Shahzad Akbar; Boris Zhivotovsky
Related Documents :
10848914 - Cross-reactivity of t-cell responses to dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and d. farinae. ...
3998814 - Development of chemosensitivity of an identified insect interneurone.
8534124 - Functional defect in cells involved in langerhans cell histiocytosis.
9302924 - Immunohistochemical study of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in p...
7601424 - Phenobarbital modulates the type of cell death by rat hepatocytes during deprivation of...
6307394 - Glucocorticoid control of steroidogenesis in isolated rat adrenocortical cells.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2012-03-30
Journal Detail:
Title:  PloS one     Volume:  7     ISSN:  1932-6203     ISO Abbreviation:  PLoS ONE     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-04-05     Completed Date:  2012-08-28     Revised Date:  2013-06-26    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101285081     Medline TA:  PLoS One     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  e33134     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Medicine, Division of Toxicology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Apoptosis / genetics,  radiation effects
Argonaute Proteins / genetics,  metabolism
Blotting, Western
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / genetics,  metabolism,  pathology
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell Survival / genetics,  radiation effects
DEAD-box RNA Helicases / genetics*,  metabolism
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic / radiation effects
Humans
Lung Neoplasms / genetics,  metabolism,  pathology
MicroRNAs / biosynthesis,  genetics*
Nuclear Proteins / genetics,  metabolism
RNA Interference*
Radiation, Ionizing*
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Ribonuclease III / genetics*,  metabolism
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma / genetics,  metabolism,  pathology
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Argonaute Proteins; 0/EIF2C2 protein, human; 0/MicroRNAs; 0/Nuclear Proteins; 0/SND1 protein, human; EC 3.1.26.3/DICER1 protein, human; EC 3.1.26.3/DROSHA protein, human; EC 3.1.26.3/Ribonuclease III; EC 3.6.1.-/DEAD-box RNA Helicases
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): PLoS One
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): PLoS ONE
Journal ID (publisher-id): plos
Journal ID (pmc): plosone
ISSN: 1932-6203
Publisher: Public Library of Science, San Francisco, USA
Article Information
Download PDF
Surova et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received Day: 29 Month: 11 Year: 2011
Accepted Day: 5 Month: 2 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 30 Month: 3 Year: 2012
Volume: 7 Issue: 3
E-location ID: e33134
ID: 3316564
PubMed Id: 22479364
Publisher Id: PONE-D-11-24058
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033134

Knock-Down of Core Proteins Regulating MicroRNA Biogenesis Has No Effect on Sensitivity of Lung Cancer Cells to Ionizing Radiation Alternate Title:miRNA Biogenesis and Lung Cancer Radioresistance
Olga Surova1
Nadeem Shahzad Akbar1
Boris Zhivotovsky12*
Eric J. Bernhardedit1 Role: Editor
1Institute of Environmental Medicine, Division of Toxicology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
2Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, MV Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
National Cancer Institute, United States of America
Correspondence: * E-mail: Boris.Zhivotovsky@ki.se
Contributed by footnote: Conceived and designed the experiments: OS BZ. Performed the experiments: OS NSA. Analyzed the data: OS NSA BZ. Wrote the paper: OS BZ.

Introduction

Lung cancer (LC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide in both women and men. There are two main types of this neoplasia, small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), which differ considerably in their histopathological features and responses to therapy. Ionizing radiation, alone or in combination with surgery or chemotherapy, is an effective treatment for many cancers, including LC. However, both intrinsic and acquired tumor radioresistance greatly reduce the efficacy of radiotherapy for NSCLC and SCLC and often lead to relapse and metastasis. Therefore, it is of great importance to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the resistance of LC cells to radiation.

MicroRNAs (miRNA), non-protein coding, single-stranded RNAs of 19–25 nucleotides, constitute a novel class of gene regulators and have been reported to play a critical role in cancer transformation [1]. Recent studies demonstrated the aberrant expression of miRNAs in LC [2]-[5]. The production of miRNAs requires a set of proteins collectively referred to as the miRNA machinery. Aberrant expression of components of the miRNA machinery has been implicated in tumorigenesis, including LC [6], [7]. Up-regulation of Dicer in lung adenocarcinoma and its possible role in the development of peripheral adenocarcinomas have been reported [7]. High expression of other RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) proteins, fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 (FXR1), Tudor-SN (TSN) and protein activator of the interferon-induced protein kinase (PACT), have been demonstrated in SCLC [7]. Another group described an association between reduced Dicer expression and poor prognosis in LC patients [8]. Thus, additional investigations are required to further elucidate the role of miRNA machinery in the molecular pathogenesis of LC. Recently, the potential therapeutic effect of Dicer depletion on the chemosensitivity and proliferation of breast cancer cells has been reported. The knock-down of Dicer by siRNA led to significant G1 arrest and increased sensitivity to the DNA-damaging agent, cisplatin, in the breast cancer cell line MCF-7 [9]. Given the fundamental and multiple biological roles of miRNAs in different cellular processes, the modulation of expression of proteins involved in miRNAs biogenesis might be a promising therapeutic approach for further clinical application. To date there are no data concerning the role of miRNA-producing proteins in mechanisms of resistance/sensitivity of LC cells to treatment. Therefore, we investigated whether the depletion of core proteins involved in miRNAs biogenesis influences the resistance of LC to radiotherapy. Surprisingly, knock-down of expression of Drosha, Dicer, Argonaute2 and Tudor-SN by RNA interference did not increase the sensitivity of NSCLC cells that were resistant to treatment with ionizing radiation.


Materials and Methods
Cell Culture and Treatments

Human NSCLC cell lines U1810, U1299 (both from the UU collection), A549, H661, H157, H23 (all from the ATCC); and SCLC cell lines H69 (ECACC), H82 (ATCC), U1906, U1690, U2020, U1285 (all from the UU collection) were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) (all obtained from Gibco) at 37°C, 5% CO2 and 95% humidity. Cells were exposed to irradiation at a dose of 8 Gy using a 60Co source (Karolinska Biomics Center, Karolinska University Hospital) for the periods indicated in the figure legends.

Evaluation of Apoptosis

Apoptosis was determined by the amount of cells in the sub-G1 phase. The cells were trypsinized and resuspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% FBS. A total of 1×106 cells were used for analysis. Cells were pelleted at 2000 rpm and washed once in PBS. The pellet was resuspended in 250 µL ice-cold PBS and mixed with 2 mL ice-cold 70% ethanol dropwise while vortexing. Samples were kept at 4°C for 24 h and afterwards pelleted at 2000 rpm and washed twice with PBS. After the last wash the cells were resuspended in 360 µL PBS containing 100 µg/mL RNase-A (Fermentas) and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Forty µL of propidium iodide solution (stock at 0.5 mg/mL) was added to the samples followed by incubation for 30 min at room temperature with gentle swinging and protection from light. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACScan, Becton Dickinson), and data were evaluated using Cell Quest software.

Caspase Activity Assay

Cells were washed with ice-cold PBS, resuspended in 25 µL PBS, lysed by freezing in liquid nitrogen, incubated with caspase-3-like substrate and analyzed as described previously [10]. Caspase activity was expressed as the fold of increase relative to appropriate controls.

siRNA Transfection

siRNAs targeting human Dicer1, Drosha, Argonaute2 and non-targeting siRNA as a negative control were obtained from Thermo Scientific Dharmacon® and stored at a concentration of 20 µM. Twenty-four hours before transfection cells were seeded onto 6-well plates in growth media without antibiotics. siRNAs were diluted in 100 µL RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) and mixed with 1 µL DharmaFECT®1 siRNA Transfection Reagent (Thermo Scientific Dharmacon®). After 20 min of incubation, the complexes were added to the cells to give a final concentration of siRNAs in the medium of 50 nM. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the medium was replaced and cells were subjected to irradiation.

Western Blot Detection

Cells were lysed using Complete lysis buffer (Roche) plus protease inhibitor cocktail (PIC, Complete-M, Roche). The protein concentration was determined using the BCA protein assay (Pierce). After mixing with Laemmli’s buffer, samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. For immunodetection, the following antibodies were used: anti-Dicer, anti-cleaved PARP, anti-cleaved caspase-3, anti-cleaved caspase-9 (all obtained from Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Ago2, anti-Drosha (both from Millipore), anti-XPO5, anti-PRKRA (PACT) (both from Abnova), anti-FXR1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich), and anti-GAPDH (Trevigen). Horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Pierce) and an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Western blot detection reagent, GE Healthcare UK Limited) were used for the detection of recognized proteins. Densitometric analysis for quantification of the relative level of protein expression was performed using ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/).

Real-Time Quantitative PCR

RNA was isolated from cells using a PureLink™ RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen). Reverse-transcribed cDNAs from the samples were used as templates. Argonaute2 (Ago2-left ctaccttcccctggaggtctg and Ago2-right cgacctagcagtcgctctga) and 18S ribosomal RNA (18S-1 cgctactaccgattggatggtt and 18S-2 agtcaagttcgaccgtcttctc) primers (Invitrogen) were designed to match the target cDNA sequence. Twenty ng of the reverse-transcribed cDNA template was mixed with SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and amplified using a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with the following program: 40 cycles, with each cycle consisting of a denaturation step at 95°C for 15 s and an annealing/extension step at 60°C for 1 min.

Statistical Evaluation

The results of three independent experiments were expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. Statistical evaluation was performed using a non-paired t-test.


Results
Expression of Proteins Involved in miRNA Biogenesis in NSCLC and SCLC

In order to identify molecular targets for the radiosensitization of LC cells among proteins involved in miRNA biogenesis we performed a protein expression analysis of seven core miRNA machinery components in a panel of NSCLC and SCLC (six cell lines in each panel). For each LC subtype the cell lines were selected based on their radiosensitivity, as measured by the fraction surviving after exposure to 2 Gy (SF2) in a clonogenic survival assay, and grouped into radiosensitive (RS) with SF2 < 0.3 Gy or radioresistant (RR) with SF2 ≥ 0.3 Gy [11]-[14]. The basal levels of all proteins (Drosha, Dicer, exportin-5 (XPO5), Tudor-SN (TSN), protein activator of the interferon-induced protein kinase (PACT), fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 (FXR1) and Argonaute2 (Ago2) were assessed by Western blot in all selected cell lines prior to irradiation (Figure 1A). Both RNase III enzymes (Drosha and Dicer) were expressed at relatively high levels in NSCLC cells compared with SCLC. A member of the karyopherins protein family, XPO5, which is involved in the nuclear export of miRNAs, was expressed at a higher level in H661 while low levels of expression were seen in H69 and U1690 compared to the remaining cell lines. The level of expression of TSN, PACT, FXR1 and Ago2 proteins did not vary profoundly among the various cell lines, with the exception of H69, which exhibited lower expression of all of the studied proteins. As our panel consisted of both RS and RR cells, the H23 cell line was selected as the representative of radiosensitive cells, and U1810 and H661 were used as representatives of radioresistant cells in further investigations. Densitometric analysis of protein expression revealed that Dicer, Drosha and XPO5 were expressed at higher levels in RR cells compared to RS, whereas there was no clear correlation between the levels of expression of Ago2, TSN, PACT and FXR1 and SF2 values (Figure 1B).

Effect of Ionizing Radiation on miRNA Machinery in NSCLC

To further investigate the role of miRNA machinery components in the response of LC cells to irradiation, two RR cell lines (U1810 and H661) and one RS line (H23) from the panel of NSCLC were subjected to gamma irradiation and protein expression was analyzed 6, 24 and 48 h after treatment. As expected, massive apoptotic cell death was observed in H23 at 6 h after ionizing radiation, as assessed by the cleavage of PARP, whereas H661 and U1810 responded to treatment at later time points after 24 and 48 h, respectively (Figure 2). No visible changes in expression of any of the studied proteins were detected either in RR or RS cells, as measured by Western blot at 6, 24 and 48 h after IR treatment (Figure 2). Thus, gamma irradiation does not affect the expression of core proteins of the miRNA machinery in NSCLC regardless of the RR or RS phenotype of these cancer cells.

Knock-down of Core Proteins Involved in the First Step of miRNA Biogenesis is not Sufficient to Sensitize NSCLC Cells to Irradiation

Since the level of protein expression of at least three miRNA machinery components, Dicer, Drosha and XPO5, was positively correlated with the radioresistance of NSCLC cells, the high level of their expression may contribute to the tumor cells’ response to treatment in a miRNA-guided fashion. To explore this possibility we decided to investigate the potential sensitizing effect of down-regulation of Dicer and Drosha proteins in the U1810 cell line. The nuclear ribonuclease Drosha and the cytoplasmic ribonuclease Dicer are the two main regulators of the first step of miRNA production and promote the cleavage of long primary transcripts into the hairpin intermediates (pre-miRNAs) and subsequent cleavage into mature miRNAs. Thus, by eliminating either of these two core proteins we expected to reduce miRNA production and affect the radioresistance of NSCLC cells.

The knock-down of Dicer in U1810 cells was performed using RNA interference, after which the cells were subjected to gamma irradiation and analyzed 48 h after treatment. The complete silencing of Dicer protein expression was confirmed by Western blot before and after irradiation (Figure 3A). Down-regulation of Dicer was followed by decreased production of several miRNAs (miR1301, miR1249, miR1227, miR532-3p, miR625, miR1827, miR324-5p) as assessed by real-time PCR (data not shown). However, U1810 cells with depleted Dicer exhibited as strong response to ionizing radiation as did wild-type cells. There were no differences in the cleavage of PARP between control and Dicer knocked-down cells (Figure 3A). The percentage of apoptotic cells after irradiation was the same in all studied groups (Figure 3B). Analysis of activation of caspases showed that caspase-3 and -9 were equally processed after irradiation and that caspase-3-like activity was almost identical in both wild-type and Dicer-depleted cells (Figure 3A and C). A similar effect on radioresistance was apparent when Drosha was depleted in U1810 cells. No changes in PAPR cleavage (Figure 3D) or the number of apoptotic cells (Figure 3E) were detected among control and Drosha knocked-down cells 48 h after ionizing radiaiton. Similar results were obtained following the elimination of Dicer and Drosha from other NSCLC cell lines (Figure S1 and S2). Overall these data suggest that knock-down of either Dicer or Drosha was not sufficient to sensitize NSCLC cells to gamma irradiation.

Down-regulation of Main Components of RNA-induced Silencing Complex (RISC) does not Sensitize NSCLC Cells to Irradiation

Since the depletion of core proteins of the first step of miRNA biogenesis did not affect the radiosensitivity of NSCLC, it is possible that RNA interference-mediated knock-down of either Dicer or Drosha results in a significant reduction, but not the full loss, of mature miRNA due to the long half-life of mature molecules. miRNAs are stable once they enter into the effector complex. Therefore, we decided to block the second step of miRNA biogenesis by knock-down of the two main components of RISC, Argonaute2 and Tudor-SN, and thus establish their role in the radioresistance of LC cells. The effective down-regulation of expression of Ago2 in the U1810 cell line was confirmed by measuring its mRNA expression, which was reduced by up to 95% after transfection with anti-Ago2 siRNA (Figure 4A). Nevertheless, the apoptotic response (assessed by PARP cleavage and processing of caspase-3 and -9) exhibited by Ago2-depleted cells after irradiation was as strong as in the wild-type U1810 cells (Figure 4B). Additionally, there were no significant changes in the percentage of the sub-G1 population or the activation of caspase-3 after ionizing radiation, although both parameters were slightly decreased in Ago2-down-regulated cells compared to wild-type cells (Figure 4C and D).

Finally, the same set of experiments was conducted in order to knock-down the expression of another RISC component, Tudor-SN. Besides its function as a component of the multiprotein complex involved in miRNA functioning, TSN is known to act as a transcriptional activator and oncogene in many cancers. Additionally, it is cleaved during apoptosis. Even though significant down-regulation of TSN expression using siRNA was achieved in U1810 cells, as shown by Western blot analysis, the knocked-down cells exhibited similar cleavage of PARP as the wild-type upon ionizing radiation treatment (Figure 5A). The percentage of apoptotic cells did not differ between control and TSN knocked-down groups after irradiation (Figure 5B). Similar results were obtained for two other cell lines from the NSCLC panel (A549 and H661) after down-regulation of TSN (Figure 5C and D).


Discussion

Radiotherapy is a major therapeutic weapon in LC. However, the effectiveness of this type of therapy is limited by the initial or acquired radioresistance of the tumor cells. NSCLC is characterized by a low tumor response rate to irradiation and a 5-year survival rate of only 7% to 10% [15]. SCLCs initially respond well to conventional chemo- and radiotherapy, but develop acquired chemo- and radioresistance over the subsequent 3 to 12 months, and the overall 5-year survival rate is only 5% [16]. The mechanisms leading to the radioresistance of these tumors are not yet fully understood.

miRNAs have been reported to be potential diagnostic or therapeutic targets in cancer treatment, including lung tumors. There is increasing evidence of the association between miRNA expression in tumors and chemo- and radiosensitivity, both with regards to predicting and modulating sensitivity [17]-[20]. A recent study on NSCLC identified a subset of miRNAs showing robust changes in expression in response to irradiation. Thus, a global miRNA response does exist in all tumor cells, including lung cancer, and miRNAs might be components of the cellular response to cytotoxic insult [20]. Similar findings concerning the changes in global miRNA expression were reported after anticancer treatment with various chemotherapeutic drugs in different cancer cell lines and patient samples [21]. The expression of the miRNA processing components was shown to be deregulated in different human cancers [8], [22], [23] and, thus, might contribute to tumor cells’ response to treatment in a miRNA-guided fashion or independently of the RNA interference pathway. Down-regulation of Dicer in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line by siRNA was shown to cause G1 arrest and increase sensitivity to the DNA-damaging agent, cisplatin, suggesting that the combination of the anti-Dicer strategy and traditional chemotherapy could improve the efficiency of cancer treatment [9]. Another study demonstrated that Dicer down-regulation can increase the proliferative and invasive ability of tumor cells in vitro and similarly promote subcutaneous tumor xenograft proliferation in vivo 24. Overall, these data suggest that miRNA machinery plays either a negative or positive role in tumor transformation and response to therapy in different types of cancer. In the present study, we aimed to clarify the role of miRNA biogenesis components in the modulation of radiation response in NSCLC and SCLC cell lines. In order to identify molecular targets for radiosensitization, the protein expression analysis of seven core proteins of the miRNA machinery, Drosha, Dicer, XPO5, TSN, PACT, FXR1 and Ago2, was performed in a panel of NSCLC and SCLC cell lines. Our findings demonstrated the higher expression of Drosha and Dicer proteins in cells resistant to radiation compared to sensitive lines. However, knock-down of these two essential proteins did not affect the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to treatment with gamma irradiation. This may partially be due to the long half-life of mature miRNA. Several studies have shown that RNA interference-mediated knock-down of Drosha, XPO5-5 or Dicer results in a significant reduction, but not the full loss, of mature miRNA [25]-[28]. Since miRNAs seem to be quite stable once they enter into the effector complex, we explored the possibility of increasing the radiosensitivity of lung tumor cells by the depletion of down-stream components of the miRNA biogenesis pathway, i.e., two main RISC proteins, Ago2 and Tudor-SN. Nevertheless, down-regulation of these proteins did not affect the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to treatment. So, there may be alternative biogenesis pathway(s) that can be activated upon disruption of one of the multiple steps in the canonical miRNA biogenesis process. Some miRNAs were found to be generated via a Dicer-independent biogenesis pathway: after being processed by Drosha, the pre-miRNAs can be directly loaded to Ago and cleaved by the Ago catalytic center to generate an intermediate 3̀ end, which is further trimmed [29]. There is also a class of non-canonical miRNAs that bypass the Drosha microprocessor, but still require Dicer for their biogenesis [30]. It should be noted that analysis of the protein expression of all core components of the miRNA machinery in U1810 cells performed after down-regulation of Dicer, Drosha, TSN or Ago2 revealed that neither of the knock-downs had a significant effect on the expression of other proteins in the pathway, i.e. we observed no increase in the expression of miRNA machinery components following knock-downs (Figure S3). On the other hand, a recent study performed on immortalized and primary endothelial cells showed that global suppression of miRNA expression achieved through down-regulation of either Ago2 or Dicer proteins using siRNA led to increased cell death after irradiation [31]. This indicates that the contribution of the miRNA machinery to the response to radiotherapy might highly depend on cell type and be different in normal and cancer cells.

Another report showed that miRNA biogenesis is globally induced upon DNA damage in an ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase-dependent manner in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) after treatment with the radiomimetic drug neocarcinostatin (NCS), which generates double-strand breaks (DSBs). KH-type splicing regulatory protein (KSRP) was found to be a key player that translates DNA damage signaling to miRNA biogenesis. The ATM kinase directly binds to and phosphorylates KSRP, leading to enhanced interaction between KSRP and pri-miRNAs and increased KSRP activity in miRNA processing [32]. Whether KSRP is activated and contributes to miRNA processing in NSCLC upon the down-regulation of core components of the miRNA machinery and treatment with gamma irradiation remains to be clarified.

Additionally, it is known that most miRNAs have dozens to hundreds of targets, and that target mRNAs may bind multiple miRNAs. Perhaps the magnitude of decrease in miRNA production and activity caused by the elimination of a single protein from a miRNA pathway is not enough to affect the mechanisms responsible for the resistance of LC cells to irradiation treatment. In other words, it is likely that a real impact on the radioresistance of NSCLC cells via the miRNA machinery cannot be achieved by the elimination of single proteins from the biogenesis pathway, and thus further identification and targeting of particular miRNAs involved in the response of LC cells to irradiation therapy is required.

In summary, in the present study the expression of a set of proteins involved in miRNA biogenesis was assessed for the first time in a panel of human LC cell lines. Even though the expression of core proteins of the miRNA pathway correlated with the resistance of cells to radiotherapy, the knock-down of these proteins was not sufficient to trigger the sensitization of LC cells to this type of treatment. This suggests that lung tumor radioresistance cannot be overcome by modulation of the miRNA biogenesis machinery and that other strategies are required to combat lung cancer.


Supporting Information Figure S1

The expression of Dicer and PARP cleavage in A549 and H661 cells transfected with control (si scr) or Dicer (si Dicer) siRNA analyzed by Western blot 48 h after treatment with irradiation (A). Equal loading was verified using anti-GAPDH antibodies. (B) Apoptotic cell death in A549 and H661 cells measured by analysis of the sub-G1 population after transfection (48 h) with control or Drosha siRNA and irradiation treatment (48 h).

(TIF)


Click here for additional data file (pone.0033134.s001.png)

Figure S2

The level of Drosha and cleaved PARP in A549 (A) and H661 (C) cells after knock-down of Drosha. Equal loading was verified using anti-GAPDH antibodies. (B) The percentage of apoptotic cells in A549 transfected with Drosha siRNA and treated with irradiation (48 h). (D) Caspase-3-like activity (fold increase with respect to control) in H661 cells after treatment with either irradiation alone or in combination with transfection with control or Drosha siRNA.

(TIF)


Click here for additional data file (pone.0033134.s002.png)

Figure S3

The level of Drosha, Dicer, XPO5, TSN, PACT after knock-down of Dicer, Drosha, TSN and Ago2 in U1810 cells. Equal loading was verified using anti-GAPDH antibodies.

(TIF)


Click here for additional data file (pone.0033134.s003.png)


Notes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish and the Stockholm Cancer Societies, the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation, Swedish Society for Medical Research, the Russian Ministry of High Education and Science (11.G34.31.0006), the EC FP-6 (Chemores) as well as the FP7 (APO-SYS) programs. OS was supported by a fellowship from the Swedish Institute and Karolinska Institutet and NA by Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

The authors would like to express the gratitude to Hogir Salim, Dali Zong and Birgitta Mörk (Karolinska Biomics Center, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet) for technical assistance.


References
1. Bartel DP. Year: 2004MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function.Cell11628129714744438
2. Liu X,Sempere LF,Guo Y,Korc M,Kauppinen S,et al. Year: 2011Involvement of microRNAs in lung cancer biology and therapy.Transl Res15720020821420030
3. Boeri M,Verri C,Conte D,Roz L,Modena P,et al. Year: 2011MicroRNA signatures in tissues and plasma predict development and prognosis of computed tomography detected lung cancer.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1083713371821300873
4. Du L,Schageman JJ,Irnov,Girard L,Hammond SM,et al. Year: 2010MicroRNA expression distinguishes SCLC from NSCLC lung tumor cells and suggests a possible pathological relationship between SCLCs and NSCLCs.J Exp Clin Cancer Res297520624269
5. Wang QZ,Xu W,Habib N,Xu R. Year: 2009Potential uses of microRNA in lung cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.Curr Cancer Drug Targets957259419519323
6. Esquela-Kerscher A,Slack FJ. Year: 2006Oncomirs - microRNAs with a role in cancer.Nat Rev Cancer625926916557279
7. Chiosea S,Jelezcova E,Chandran U,Luo J,Mantha G,et al. Year: 2007Overexpression of Dicer in precursor lesions of lung adenocarcinoma.Cancer Res672345235017332367
8. Karube Y,Tanaka H,Osada H,Tomida S,Tatematsu Y,et al. Year: 2005Reduced expression of Dicer associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer patients.Cancer Sci9611111515723655
9. Bu Y,Lu C,Bian C,Wang J,Li J,et al. Year: 2009Knockdown of Dicer in MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells results in G1 arrest and increased sensitivity to cisplatin.Oncol Rep21131719082437
10. Kaminskyy VO,Surova OV,Vaculova A,Zhivotovsky B. Year: 2011Combined inhibition of DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase restores caspase-8 expression and sensitizes SCLC cells to TRAIL.Carcinogenesis321450145821771726
11. Bergh J,Larsson E,Zech L,Nilsson K. Year: 1982Establishment and characterization of two neoplastic cell lines (U-1285 and U-1568) derived from small cell carcinoma of the lung.Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand A901491586285665
12. Bergh J,Nilsson K,Ekman R,Giovanella B. Year: 1985Establishment and characterization of cell lines from human small cell and large cell carcinomas of the lung.Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand A931331472990154
13. Carney DN,Mitchell JB,Kinsella TJ. Year: 1983In vitro radiation and chemotherapy sensitivity of established cell lines of human small cell lung cancer and its large cell morphological variants.Cancer Res43280628116303568
14. Carmichael J,Degraff WG,Gamson J,Russo D,Gazdar AF,et al. Year: 1989Radiation sensitivity of human lung cancer cell lines.Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol255275342539297
15. Spiro SG,Silvestri GA. Year: 2005One hundred years of lung cancer.Am J Respir Crit Care Med17252352915961694
16. Worden FP,Kalemkerian GP. Year: 2000Therapeutic advances in small cell lung cancer.Expert Opin Investig Drugs9565579
17. Chen G,Zhu W,Shi D,Lv L,Zhang C,et al. Year: 2010MicroRNA-181a sensitizes human malignant glioma U87MG cells to radiation by targeting Bcl-2.Oncol Rep23997100320204284
18. Chun-Zhi Z,Lei H,An-Ling Z,Yan-Chao F,Xiao Y,et al. Year: 2010MicroRNA-221 and microRNA-222 regulate gastric carcinoma cell proliferation and radioresistance by targeting PTEN.BMC Cancer1036720618998
19. Jiang P,Rao EY,Meng N,Zhao Y,Wang JJ. Year: 2010MicroRNA-17–92 significantly enhances radioresistance in human mantle cell lymphoma cells.Radiat Oncol510021040528
20. Shin S,Cha HJ,Lee EM,Lee SJ,Seo SK,et al. Year: 2009Alteration of miRNA profiles by ionizing radiation in A549 human non-small cell lung cancer cells.Int J Oncol35818619513554
21. Hummel R,Hussey DJ,Haier J. Year: 2010MicroRNAs: predictors and modifiers of chemo- and radiotherapy in different tumour types.Eur J Cancer4629831119948396
22. Chiosea S,Jelezcova E,Chandran U,Acquafondata M,McHale T,et al. Year: 2006Up-regulation of Dicer, a component of the MicroRNA machinery, in prostate adenocarcinoma.Am J Pathol1691812182017071602
23. Faggad A,Budczies J,Tchernitsa O,Darb-Esfahani S,Sehouli J,et al. Year: 2010Prognostic significance of Dicer expression in ovarian cancer-link to global microRNA changes and oestrogen receptor expression.J Pathol22038239119960504
24. Han L,Zhang A,Zhou X,Xu P,Wang GX,et al. Year: 2010Down-regulation of Dicer enhances tumor cell proliferation and invasion.Int J Oncol3729930520596657
25. Lee Y,Ahn C,Han J,Choi H,Kim J,et al. Year: 2003The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing.Nature42541541914508493
26. Lund E,Guttinger S,Calado A,Dahlberg JE,Kutay U. Year: 2004Nuclear export of microRNA precursors.Science303959814631048
27. Yi R,Qin Y,Macara IG,Cullen BR. Year: 2003Exportin-5 mediates the nuclear export of pre-microRNAs and short hairpin RNAs.Genes Dev173011301614681208
28. Ketting RF,Fischer SE,Bernstein E,Sijen T,Hannon GJ,et al. Year: 2001Dicer functions in RNA interference and in synthesis of small RNA involved in developmental timing in C. elegans.Genes Dev152654265911641272
29. Cheloufi S,Dos Santos CO,Chong MM,Hannon GJ. Year: 2010A Dicer-independent miRNA biogenesis pathway that requires Ago catalysis.Nature46558458920424607
30. Babiarz JE,Hsu R,Melton C,Thomas M,Ullian EM,et al. Year: 2011A role for noncanonical microRNAs in the mammalian brain revealed by phenotypic differences in Dgcr8 versus Dicer1 knockouts and small RNA sequencing.RNA171489150121712401
31. Kraemer A,Anastasov N,Angermeier M,Winkler K,Atkinson MJ,et al. Year: 2011MicroRNA-mediated processes are essential for the cellular radiation response.Radiat Res17657558621854212
32. Zhang X,Wan G,Berger FG,He X,Lu X. Year: 2011The ATM kinase induces microRNA biogenesis in the DNA damage response.Mol Cell4137138321329876

Figures

[Figure ID: pone-0033134-g001]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033134.g001.
Figure 1  NSCLC and SCLC cells differ in sensitivity to radiation treatment and display differential expression of proteins involved in the regulation of miRNA biogenesis.

(A) Western blot analysis of the level of protein expression of Drosha, Dicer, exportin 5 (XPO5), Tudor-SN (TSN), protein activator of the interferon-induced protein kinase (PACT), fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 (FXR1) and Argonaute 2 (AGO2) in a panel of NSCLC (U1810, U1299, A549, H661, H157, H23) and SCLC (U1285, H82, H69, U1690, U1906, U2020) cell lines. (B) Densitometric analysis of relative levels of protein expression in H23, H1299, U1810 and H661 cell lines. Cell lines distributed according to radiosensitivity, measured as the fraction surviving at 2 Gy (SF2). Equal loading was verified using anti-β-actin antibodies. Results are representative of three independent experiments.



[Figure ID: pone-0033134-g002]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033134.g002.
Figure 2  Expression of components of miRNA machinery in NSCLC following treatment with ionizing radiation.

The cleavage of PARP and the level of expression of Drosha, Dicer, exportin 5 (XPO5), Tudor-SN (TSN), protein activator of the interferon-induced protein kinase (PACT), and fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 1 (FXR1) in U1810, H661 and H23 cells were detected by Western blot at 6, 24 and 48 h post-irradiation with 8 Gy. Equal loading was verified using anti-β-actin antibodies. Data are representative of three independent experiments.



[Figure ID: pone-0033134-g003]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033134.g003.
Figure 3  Knock-down of Dicer and Drosha is not sufficient to sensitize NSCLC cells to irradiation.

(A) The level of Dicer expression, cleavage of PARP and processing of caspase-3 and -9 in U1810 cells transfected (48 h) with control (si scr) or Dicer (siDicer) siRNA assessed by Western blot 48 h after irradiation. Equal loading was verified using anti-GAPDH antibodies. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (B) Detection of apoptotic cell death in U1810 assessed by measuring the sub-G1 population after transfection (48 h) with control or Dicer siRNA and irradiation treatment (48 h). (C) Caspase-3-like activity (fold increase with respect to control) in U1810 cells after treatment with either irradiation alone or in combination with transfection of control or Dicer siRNA (for details see Materials and methods). (D) The level of Drosha expression and cleavage of PARP in U1810 cells transfected (48 h) with control (si scr) or Drosha (siDrosha) siRNA analyzed by Western blot 48 h after treatment with irradiation. Equal loading was verified using anti-GAPDH antibodies. All data are representative of three independent experiments. (B) Apoptotic cell death in U1810 measured by analysis of the sub-G1 population after transfection (48 h) with control or Drosha siRNA and irradiation treatment (48 h). Results shown are the mean±S.E.M. of three independent experiments.



[Figure ID: pone-0033134-g004]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033134.g004.
Figure 4  Depletion of a component of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), Argonaute2, does not affect the radioresistance of NSCLC.

(A) The level of Argonaute2 (AGO2) mRNA in U1810 cells transfected with control (scram) or AGO2 siRNA normalized against 18S ribosomal RNA. Results are the mean±S.E.M. of three independent experiments. (B) Cleavage of PARP and processing of caspase-3 and -9 in U1810 cells transfected (48 h) with control (si scr) or AGO2 siRNA, and then subjected to irradiation for 48 h. Equal loading was verified using anti-GAPDH antibodies. All data are representative of three independent experiments. (C) Detection of apoptotic cell death in U1810 cells after transfection (48 h) with control or AGO2 siRNA and subsequent treatment with irradiation (48 h). (D) Caspase-3-like activity (fold increase with respect to control) in U1810 cells after treatment with either irradiation alone or in combination with transfection with control or AGO2 siRNA. All results shown are the mean±S.E.M. of three independent experiments.



[Figure ID: pone-0033134-g005]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033134.g005.
Figure 5  The knock-down of a component of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), Tudor-SN, is insufficient to sensitize NSCLC to irradiation.

The level of Tudor-SN expression and cleavage of PARP in U1810 (A), A549 (C) and H661 (D) cells transfected (48 h) with control (si scr) or Tudor-SN (si TSN) siRNA analyzed by Western blot 48 h after irradiation. Equal loading was verified using anti-GAPDH antibodies. (B) The apoptotic cell death in U1810 cells after transfection with TSN siRNA and irradiation. All data are representative of three independent experiments.



Article Categories:
  • Research Article
Article Categories:
  • Biology
    • Biochemistry
      • Enzymes
      • Nucleic Acids
    • Biophysics
    • Computational Biology
      • Molecular Genetics
Article Categories:
  • Medicine
    • Oncology
      • Cancer Treatment
      • Cancers and Neoplasms
Article Categories:
  • Physics
    • Biophysics


Previous Document:  A cost-effectiveness analysis of "test" versus "treat" patients hospitalized with suspected influenz...
Next Document:  Dietary lactoferrin alleviates age-related lacrimal gland dysfunction in mice.