Document Detail

Ischemic and pressure-induced hyperemia: a comparison.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9821909     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: There is reason to question whether hyperemia after pressure occlusion is caused solely by local ischemia. This study quantitatively compared the response to the two forms of occlusion on the finger. DESIGN: Blood flow was measured by laser Doppler continuously before, during, and for 40 minutes after a 2-minute occlusion of flow at the finger dorsum and at the plantar surface of the finger tip (finger pulp), which has a much higher arteriolar density than the dorsum. Occlusion to the same low level was carried out either with a cuff at the base of the finger or by direct pressure of the laser Doppler probe head. Comparison experiments were performed with the probe head heated to 44 degrees C to elicit maximal local vasodilation. SETTING: Outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven healthy volunteers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Magnitude and duration of skin blood flow after occlusion. RESULTS: Cuff occlusion at the base of the finger produced a typical, short-lived hyperemic response at both finger dorsum and finger pulp. The peak level at finger dorsum was 17.6 +/- 1.4mL/min/100g, approximately a twofold increase over the baseline flow level. The duration of the hyperemic response was 3.6 +/- 0.8 minutes. The baseline flow at the finger pulp was three times greater than at the finger dorsum, and peak flow after occlusion was also three times higher (44.3 +/- 2.6 mL/min/100g). The duration of hyperemia at finger pulp was 4.2 +/- 0.9 minutes. After pressure occlusion at the finger dorsum the hyperemic peak was higher (26.7 +/- 4.2 mL/min/100g; p < .05) and the duration of hyperemia was four times longer (16.9 +/- 2.3 minutes; p < .01) than after cuff occlusion. At the finger pulp, the pressure-induced hyperemic peak was also greater than the peak after cuff occlusion (56.3 +/- 1.7mL/min/100g; p < .05), with a longer duration than after cuff occlusion (11.1 +/- 1.1min; p < .01). Thermal stimulation significantly reduced the differences between cuff- and pressure-induced occlusion. There was a slow increase in flow over the 40-minute monitoring period. The maximal flow reached was approximately 100mL/min/100g at both finger dorsum and finger pulp. At both sites, however, the maximal flow level was attained more rapidly than the control condition without prior occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirmed that the pressure-induced hyperemic response is greater and of longer duration than that produced by flow ischemia alone. Thermal stimulation essentially abolishes the differences, suggesting that there is a common mechanism of vasodilatation. The mechanistic differences between pressure-induced and ischemic hyperemia remain to be determined.
M S Rendell; J M Wells
Related Documents :
3412029 - Effect of arterial revascularization on transcutaneous oxygen tension of the ischemic e...
3434099 - Prognostic value of consecutive peripheral pressure registration after reconstructive p...
8138839 - Blood pressure measurement error: its effect on cross-sectional and trend analyses.
12615509 - Schematic illustration of some of the mechanisms for maintenance of homeostasis in orga...
11531669 - Blood pressure measurement in volunteers with and without padding between the cuff and ...
22584559 - The systemic and regional hemodynamic effects of phenylephrine in sheep under normal co...
17938849 - Are maximum p wave duration and p wave dispersion a marker of target organ damage in th...
23861329 - Urodynamic effects of dutasteride add-on therapy to alpha-adrenergic antagonist for pat...
15604299 - Medullary lateral tegmental field: control of respiratory rate and vagal lung inflation...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation     Volume:  79     ISSN:  0003-9993     ISO Abbreviation:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil     Publication Date:  1998 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-12-04     Completed Date:  1998-12-04     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  2985158R     Medline TA:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1451-5     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
The Creighton Diabetes Center, Omaha, NE 68131, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Fingers / blood supply*
Hyperemia / physiopathology*
Ischemia / physiopathology*
Laser-Doppler Flowmetry
Regional Blood Flow

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Head movement restriction and postural stability in patients with compensated unilateral vestibular ...
Next Document:  Predicting neurologic recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.