Document Detail


Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11896947     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To test the null hypothesis that no correlation exists between transvaginal digital and the gold standard technique of transabdominal suprapubic ultrasound assessments of fetal head position during labor. A secondary objective was to compare the performance of attending physicians vs. senior residents in depicting fetal head position by transvaginal digital examination in comparison with ultrasound, respectively. METHODS: Consecutive patients in active labor at term with normal singleton cephalic-presenting fetuses were included. All participants had ruptured membranes, cervical dilation > or = 4 cm and fetal head at ischial spine station -2 or lower. Transvaginal sterile digital examinations were performed by either senior residents or attending physicians and followed immediately by transverse suprapubic transabdominal ultrasound assessments. Examiners were blinded to each other's findings. Power-analyses dictated number of subjects required. Statistical analyses included Chi-square, Cohen's Kappa test and logistic regression analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients were studied (n = 102). In only 24% of patients (n = 24), transvaginal digital examinations were consistent with ultrasound assessments (P = 0.002, 95% confidence interval, 16-33). Logistic regression revealed that cervical effacement (P = 0.03) and ischial spine station (P = 0.01) significantly affected the accuracy of transvaginal digital examination. Parity, gestational age, combined spinal epidural anesthesia, cervical dilation, birth weight and examiner experience did not significantly affect accuracy of the examination. The accuracy of the transvaginal digital exams was increased to 47% (n = 48) (95% confidence interval, 37-57) when fetal head position at transvaginal digital examination was recorded as correct if reported within +/- 45 degrees of the ultrasound assessment. The rate of agreement between the two assessment methods for attending physicians vs. residents was 58% vs. 33%, respectively (P = 0.02) with the +/- 45 degrees analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Using ultrasound assessment as the gold standard, our data demonstrate an overall high rate of error (76%) in transvaginal digital determination of fetal head position during active labor, consistent with the null hypothesis. Attending physicians exhibited an almost two-fold higher success rate in depicting correct fetal head position by physical examination vs. residents in the +/- 45 degrees analysis. Intrapartum ultrasound increases the accuracy of fetal head position assessment during active labor and may serve as an educational tool for physicians in training.
Authors:
D M Sherer; M Miodovnik; K S Bradley; O Langer
Related Documents :
15996667 - Rate of increase in oxytocin dose on the outcome of labor induction.
16154037 - Misoprostol use for labor induction in developing countries: a prospective study in gui...
10819857 - Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of atosiban and ritodrine in the treatment o...
11755557 - Amniotic fluid infection, cytokines, and adverse outcome among infants at 34 weeks' ges...
17974487 - Developing two different measures for assessing knowledge of and attitudes toward epile...
481527 - The infant of the diabetic mother: correlation of increased cord c-peptide levels with ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology     Volume:  19     ISSN:  0960-7692     ISO Abbreviation:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol     Publication Date:  2002 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-03-18     Completed Date:  2002-05-14     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9108340     Medline TA:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  258-63     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10019, USA. DMSherer@aol.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Chi-Square Distribution
Female
Head / embryology,  ultrasonography*
Humans
Labor Presentation
Labor Stage, Third
Logistic Models
Obstetrics / methods
Palpation / methods*
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Statistics, Nonparametric
Ultrasonography, Prenatal*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
Next Document:  Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabd...