Document Detail


Intraindividual comparison of high-spatial-resolution abdominal MR angiography at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: initial experience.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17709837     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare three-dimensional (3D) contrast material-enhanced abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 1.5 and 3.0 T intraindividually in healthy volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained, 15 healthy male volunteers (age range, 24-41 years) underwent one abdominal 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiographic examination each at 1.5 and 3.0 T in random order. Fast 3D gradient-echo sequence with parallel imaging acceleration factor of three was used for MR angiography; acquired spatial resolutions were 1x0.8x1 mm3 (imaging time, 19 seconds) at 1.5 T and 0.9x0.8x0.9 mm3 (imaging time, 18 seconds) at 3.0 T. With the latter, volume of the 3D slab was 8% larger. At 1.5 T, 20-mL bolus of gadobenate dimeglumine was delivered at 2 mL/sec; at 3.0 T, 15-mL bolus was delivered at 2.5 mL/sec. Two blinded radiologists rated image quality of aorta and proximal renal arteries in consensus with five-point scale (4=very good, 0=nondiagnostic) according to sequence and in direct intraindividual comparison. Visibility of proximal and segmental renal arteries was rated with three-point scale (3=completely visible, 1=nonvisible). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was determined with phantoms. For statistical analysis of the SNRs, t tests were used. RESULTS: All MR angiographic measurements were diagnostic. Median score for image quality at both field strengths was 4. Depiction of proximal renal arteries was rated 3 at both field strengths. The visibility of the distal renal arteries was better at 3.0 T (median score, 3) than at 1.5 T (median score, 2). With direct comparison, 3.0-T MR angiography was better in 14 of 15 cases; no field strength was preferred in the other case. Mean SNR was significantly (P<.001) higher at 3.0 T (17.8+/-0.09 [standard deviation]) than at 1.5 T (11.9+/-0.10). CONCLUSION: MR angiography at 3.0 T provided better vessel visibility and SNR than did that at 1.5 T, although voxel size and imaging time were reduced.
Authors:
Henrik J Michaely; Harald Kramer; Olaf Dietrich; Kambiz Nael; Klaus-Peter Lodemann; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Related Documents :
12525977 - Background suppression using magnetization preparation for contrast-enhanced 3d mr angi...
8242997 - Surgical clip artefact mimicking arterial stenosis: a problem with magnetic resonance a...
16772847 - Isotropic high spatial resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the supra-aortic ar...
11096467 - Takayasu's arteritis.
15749977 - Angiosarcoma of the spleen: imaging characteristics in 12 patients.
15891157 - Carotid plaque composition and cerebral infarction: mr imaging study.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Radiology     Volume:  244     ISSN:  0033-8419     ISO Abbreviation:  Radiology     Publication Date:  2007 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-08-21     Completed Date:  2007-10-18     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401260     Medline TA:  Radiology     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  907-13     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright (c) RSNA, 2007.
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospitals Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany. henrik.michaely@med.uni-muenchen.de
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Abdomen / blood supply*
Adult
Contrast Media / administration & dosage
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional*
Magnetic Resonance Angiography / methods*
Male
Meglumine / administration & dosage,  analogs & derivatives
Organometallic Compounds / administration & dosage
Phantoms, Imaging
Prospective Studies
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Contrast Media; 0/Organometallic Compounds; 113662-23-0/gadobenic acid; 6284-40-8/Meglumine

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Enhancement patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma at contrast-enhanced US: comparison with histologic...
Next Document:  Immediate interlocking nailing versus external fixation followed by delayed interlocking nailing for...