Document Detail

Interventions on mealtime difficulties in older adults with dementia: A systematic review.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23340328     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of interventions on mealtime difficulties in older adults with dementia. DESIGN: A systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement. DATA SOURCES: Pubmed, Medline (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCOHost), EBM Reviews (OVID) and PsychINFO (OVID) were searched between January 2004 and September 2012 by using keywords as dementia, Alzheimer, feed(ing), eat(ing), mealtime(s), oral intake, nutrition, intervention, experimental, quasi-experimental and any matched terms. Other sources included Google Scholar and relevant bibliographies. REVIEW METHODS: Eligibility criteria were established by defining the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, timing and setting of interest. Studies were reviewed by title and abstract screening, and full-text assessing for eligibility. Data were abstracted from eligible studies using a self-made structured tool. Eligible studies were classified by intervention, accessed for quality using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies, and graded for evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-two intervention studies (9 RCTs), including a total of 2082 older adults with dementia and 95 professionals from more than 85 long-term care facilities, were selected, and classified into five types: nutritional supplements, training/education programs, environment/routine modification, feeding assistance and mixed interventions. Eight studies were strong, eleven moderate and three weak in quality. Limitations of body of research included lack of randomization and/or control group, small sample size without power analysis, lack of theory-based interventions and blinding, inadequate statistical analysis and plausible confounding bias. "Nutritional supplements" showed moderate evidence to increase food intake, body weight and BMI. "Training/education programs" demonstrated moderate evidence to increase eating time and decrease feeding difficulty. Both "training/education programs" and "feeding assistance" were insufficient to increase food intake. "Environment/routine modification" indicated low evidence to increase food intake, and insufficient to decrease agitation. Evidence was sparse on nutritional status, eating ability, behavior disturbance, behavioral and cognitive function, or level of dependence. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides updated evidence for clinical practice and points out priorities for nursing research. Current evidence is based on a body of research with moderate quality and existing limitations, and needs to be further explored with more rigorous studies.
Wen Liu; Jooyoung Cheon; Sue A Thomas
Related Documents :
22684228 - Prenylated isoflavonoids from plants as selective estrogen receptor modulators (phytose...
24816678 - Recent applications and developments of capacitively coupled contactless conductivity d...
22990468 - Contributions of processed foods to dietary intake in the us from 2003-2008: a report o...
24499408 - Trophic transfer, transformation, and impact of engineered nanomaterials in terrestrial...
11160548 - Older men and women efficiently absorb vitamin b-12 from milk and fortified bread.
22164308 - All you can eat: high performance capacity and plasticity in the common big-eared bat, ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-1-19
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal of nursing studies     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1873-491X     ISO Abbreviation:  Int J Nurs Stud     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-1-23     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0400675     Medline TA:  Int J Nurs Stud     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
University of Maryland School of Nursing, USA. Electronic address:
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Stability and physicochemical characterization of novel milk-based oral formulations.
Next Document:  fMRI and DTI assessment of patients undergoing radical epilepsy surgery.