Document Detail


Interpreting and using the dietary references intakes in dietary assessment of individuals and groups.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12067043     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
For individuals, a statistical approach is available to compare observed intakes to the EAR or AI (to assess adequacy), and the UL (to assess risk of excess). A more qualitative assessment of intakes involves comparison directly to the RDA to evaluate adequacy, but this is accurate only if long-term usual intake is known. For groups of people, the prevalence of inadequacy can usually be estimated as the proportion with intakes below the EAR, while the prevalence of potentially excessive intakes is estimated as the proportion above the UL. The accuracy of all assessments depends on unbiased and accurate intake estimates as well as a consideration of the effects of day-to-day variation in intake. Nutrition practitioners will find the new DRIs useful for assessing diets in a variety of settings. Computerized assessment systems will be important tools when incorporating these theoretical concepts into dietetic practice.
Authors:
Susan I Barr; Suzanne P Murphy; Mary I Poos
Related Documents :
10694783 - Association between trans fatty acid intake and cardiovascular risk factors in europe: ...
15980923 - U.s. food guide pyramid food group intake by asian indian immigrants in the u.s.
20000573 - Quantification of iprodione in dry basil using silica gel supported titanium dioxide.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the American Dietetic Association     Volume:  102     ISSN:  0002-8223     ISO Abbreviation:  J Am Diet Assoc     Publication Date:  2002 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-06-17     Completed Date:  2002-07-02     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7503061     Medline TA:  J Am Diet Assoc     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  780-8     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Binomial Distribution
Canada
Diet / standards*
Humans
Nutrition Assessment*
Nutrition Policy*
Nutrition Surveys
Nutritional Requirements
Reference Standards
Risk Assessment / methods*,  standards
United States

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The end of the golden age of doctoring.
Next Document:  The effects of physical and emotional status on adherence to a low-fat dietary pattern in the Women'...