Document Detail


Insights from Triangulation of Two Purchase Choice Elicitation Methods to Predict Social Decision Making in Healthcare.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22201266     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Background: Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) and the Juster scale are accepted methods for the prediction of individual purchase probabilities. Nevertheless, these methods have seldom been applied to a social decision-making context. Objective: To gain an overview of social decisions for a decision-making population through data triangulation, these two methods were used to understand purchase probability in a social decision-making context. Methods: We report an exploratory social decision-making study of pharmaceutical subsidy in Australia. A DCE and selected Juster scale profiles were presented to current and past members of the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee and its Economic Subcommittee. Results: Across 66 observations derived from 11 respondents for 6 different pharmaceutical profiles, there was a small overall median difference of 0.024 in the predicted probability of public subsidy (p = 0.003), with the Juster scale predicting the higher likelihood. While consistency was observed at the extremes of the probability scale, the funding probability differed over the mid-range of profiles. There was larger variability in the DCE than Juster predictions within each individual respondent, suggesting the DCE is better able to discriminate between profiles. However, large variation was observed between individuals in the Juster scale but not DCE predictions. Conclusions: It is important to use multiple methods to obtain a complete picture of the probability of purchase or public subsidy in a social decision-making context until further research can elaborate on our findings. This exploratory analysis supports the suggestion that the mixed logit model, which was used for the DCE analysis, may fail to adequately account for preference heterogeneity in some contexts.
Authors:
Jennifer A Whitty; Sharyn R Rundle-Thiele; Paul A Scuffham
Related Documents :
11459446 - Accounting for dropout bias using mixed-effects models.
7187096 - Statistical methods for estimating attributable risk from retrospective data.
15606406 - Estimation in bayesian disease mapping.
16187896 - Cross correlation maps: a tool for visualizing and modeling time lagged associations.
17685456 - Examining the effect of linkage disequilibrium between markers on the type i error rate...
17350136 - Tdc.msm: an r library for the analysis of multi-state survival data.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-12-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  Applied health economics and health policy     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1179-1896     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-12-28     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101150314     Medline TA:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Logan Campus, Meadowbrook, QLD, Australia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  National Health Insurance Reform in South Africa: Estimating the Implications for Demand for Private...
Next Document:  Nanoscale Organization of Mitochondrial Micro-Compartments Revealed by Combining Tracking and Locali...