Document Detail


Informed consent in medical treatment: conflict or consensus.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16929809     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The author reviews the legal theory and practice of the requirements for informed consent. He uses a discussion of relevant cases and judgements from courts in the UK, USA, Australia and Malaysia to illustrate apparently conflicting attitudes exemplified by these cases. From this he aims to form some consensus in their application to everyday practice.
Authors:
A M Matta
Related Documents :
20616519 - [manual treatment of the cervical spinal column for tinnitus after acute hearing loss -...
20807479 - A case law review of the individuals with disabilities education act for children with ...
8999279 - The outcome of psychiatric recommendations to courts.
22925749 - Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in asia: a systematic review.
2642679 - Cartilaginous tumors of the trachea and larynx.
24962469 - Methamphetamine intoxication in a dog: case report.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Legal Cases    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Medicine and law     Volume:  25     ISSN:  0723-1393     ISO Abbreviation:  Med Law     Publication Date:  2006 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-08-25     Completed Date:  2006-09-28     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8218185     Medline TA:  Med Law     Country:  South Africa    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  319-39     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah Faculty of Laws, International Islamic University, Malaysia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Australia
Great Britain
Humans
Informed Consent / legislation & jurisprudence*
Malaysia
United States

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Assessing mental disability in minors.
Next Document:  The declaration of Helsinki 2000: ethical principles and the dignity of difference.