Document Detail

Influences of limb proportions and body size on locomotor kinematics in terrestrial primates and fossil hominins.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15454335     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
During locomotion, mammalian limb postures are influenced by many factors including the animal's limb length and body mass. Polk (2002) compared the gait of similar-sized cercopithecine monkeys that differed limb proportions and found that longer-limbed monkeys usually adopt more extended joint postures than shorter-limbed monkeys in order to moderate their joint moments. Studies of primates as well as non-primate mammals that vary in body mass have demonstrated that larger animals use more extended limb postures than smaller animals. Such extended postures in larger animals increase the extensor muscle mechanical advantage and allow postures to be maintained with relatively less muscular effort (Polk, 2002; Biewener 1989). The results of these previous studies are used here to address two anthropological questions. The first concerns the postural effects of body mass and limb proportion differences between australopithecines and members of the genus Homo. That is, H. erectus and later hominins all have larger body mass and longer legs than australopithecines, and these anatomical differences suggest that Homo probably used more extended postures and probably required relatively less muscular force to resist gravity than the smaller and shorter-limbed australopithecines. The second question investigates how animals with similar size but different limb proportions differ in locomotor performance. The effects of limb proportions on gait are relevant to inferring postural and locomotor differences between Neanderthals and modern Homo sapiens which differ in their crural indices and relative limb length. This study demonstrates that primates with relatively long limbs achieve higher walking speeds while using lower stride frequencies and lower angular excursions than shorter-limbed monkeys, and these kinematic differences may allow longer-limbed taxa to locomote more efficiently than shorter-limbed species of similar mass. Such differences may also have characterized the gait of Homo sapiens in comparison to Neanderthals, but more experimental data on humans that vary in limb proportions are necessary in order to evaluate this question more thoroughly.
J D Polk
Related Documents :
10471015 - Effects of qigong walking on diabetic patients: a pilot study.
17687735 - Motor and functional outcomes of a patient post-stroke following combined activity and ...
18073325 - An accelerometry-based comparison of 2 robotic assistive devices for treadmill training...
12898265 - The metabolic transition speed between backward walking and running.
8933495 - Improved athletic performance in highly trained cyclists after interval training.
16400045 - Exercise and postprandial lipemia: effect of continuous compared with intermittent acti...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of human evolution     Volume:  47     ISSN:  0047-2484     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Hum. Evol.     Publication Date:  2004 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-09-29     Completed Date:  2005-01-14     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0337330     Medline TA:  J Hum Evol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  237-52     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana 61801, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Erythrocebus / anatomy & histology*,  physiology
Extremities / anatomy & histology*
Hominidae / anatomy & histology*
Papio / anatomy & histology*,  physiology

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Estimating human long bone cross-sectional geometric properties: a comparison of noninvasive methods...
Next Document:  Human size evolution: no evolutionary allometric relationship between male and female stature.