Document Detail

Influence of radiographic technique and equipment on absorbed ovarian dose associated with uterine artery embolization.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11041474     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of pulsed fluoroscopy (PF), nonpulsed fluoroscopy (NPF), and various fluoroscopic techniques on the absorbed ovarian dose (AOD) associated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) of leiomyomata. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ovarian location was estimated from preprocedural pelvic magnetic resonance images of 23 patients previously treated by means of UAE. The AOD was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) placed into an anthropomorphic phantom at the determined ovarian location. The following measurements from PF and NPF were obtained: 21.89 minutes of nonmagnified posterior-anterior fluoroscopy, 10 minutes of nonmagnified oblique fluoroscopy, 10 minutes of posterior-anterior magnified fluoroscopy, 10 minutes of combined oblique magnified fluoroscopy, and 47 simulated angiographic exposures. Numbers for nonmagnified posterior-anterior fluoroscopy time and exposure numbers were chosen from the average values from previous UAE procedures. AOD from pulsed and nonpulsed nonmagnified posterior-anterior fluoroscopy was compared to measurements from oblique magnified, posterior-anterior magnified, and oblique fluoroscopy. RESULTS: AOD from NPF was, on average, 1.7 times higher than from PF. When compared with nonmagnified posterior-anterior fluoroscopy, the AOD from oblique magnified fluoroscopy was 1.9 times greater; the AOD from nonmagnified oblique fluoroscopy was 1.1 times greater. The AOD from oblique magnified fluoroscopy was 1.5 times higher on the side closer to the x-ray tube than on the contralateral side. AOD from serial angiographic exposures contributed only less than 7% to the total AOD for the average UAE procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The AOD associated with UAE can best be reduced by limiting fluoroscopy time and the use of oblique or magnified fluoroscopy. Contribution of angiographic exposures to AOD is much less significant.
B Nikolic; S Abbara; E Levy; I Imaoka; M L Lundsten; R C Jha; J B Spies
Related Documents :
21643734 - Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a new method for tips follow-up.
10684824 - Endothelial vasodilator production by uterine and systemic arteries. iv. cyclooxygenase...
21990514 - Comparison of techniques for stent assisted coil embolization of aneurysms.
23001104 - Giant tuberculoma in an adolescent: atypical form of tuberculosis.
24296984 - The use of robotic endovascular catheters in the facilitation of transcatheter aortic v...
21683934 - Radiological anatomy of the ethmoidal arteries: ct cadaver study.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR     Volume:  11     ISSN:  1051-0443     ISO Abbreviation:  J Vasc Interv Radiol     Publication Date:  2000 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2001-02-14     Completed Date:  2001-02-15     Revised Date:  2004-11-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9203369     Medline TA:  J Vasc Interv Radiol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1173-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Embolization, Therapeutic*
Fluoroscopy / adverse effects,  instrumentation,  methods*
Leiomyoma / blood supply,  therapy*
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ovary / radiation effects*
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiation Dosage
Thermoluminescent Dosimetry
Uterine Neoplasms / blood supply,  therapy*
Uterus / blood supply

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Limb kinking in supported and unsupported abdominal aortic stent-grafts.
Next Document:  Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in the treatment of refractory ascites: results in 48...