Document Detail


Influence of free-choice vs mixed-ration diets on food intake and performance of fattening calves.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11811457     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Research findings and management recommendations typically emphasize responses of the "average" individual, yet more than half of the animals in a group may differ significantly from the mean regarding food preference and intake. The productivity of a herd may be adversely affected if animals differing from the mean are fed a uniform diet formulated to meet the needs of the "average" individual. We compared the intake and performance of beef calves offered a choice or no choice among foods. Diets consisted of ad libitum access to either a chopped, mixed ration of rolled barley (31.3%), rolled corn (31.3%), corn silage (15.5%), and alfalfa hay (18.9%) (n = 16 calves) or a choice among those foods offered individually (n = 15 calves). Averaged across the 63-d trial, the two groups did not differ in ratios of protein to energy ingested (43 vs 43 g CP/Mcal ME; P = 0.50), but preference for foods high in energy or protein varied markedly for animals fed free-choice: on d 21 they had protein:energy ratios higher than those of animals fed the mixed ration, on d 2 the ratios were equal, and on d 40 they had protein:energy ratios lower than those of animals fed the mixed ration. Throughout the trial, no two animals consistently chose the same ingredients, and none selected a diet similar to the nutritionally balanced mixed ration, yet each animal ate a diet adequate to meet its needs. Animals offered the mixed ration tended to eat more than animals offered a choice (109 vs 102 g/kg MBW/d; P = 0.10), but they did not gain at a faster rate (0.89 vs 0.92 kg/d; P = 0.65). Gain/unit of food consumed also was similar for both groups (0.09 vs 0.10 kg/kg; P = 0.38). However, food cost/day was higher for animals fed the mixed ration than for those offered a choice ($1.58 vs $1.36; P = 0.03). Consequently, cost/kilograms of gain was higher for the mixed ration than for the choice group ($1.84 vs $1.49/kg; P = 0.045). These findings suggest that 1) animals can more efficiently meet their individual needs for macronutrients when offered a choice among dietary ingredients than when constrained to a single diet, even if it is nutritionally balanced; 2) transient food aversions compound the inefficiency of a single mixed diet by depressing intake even among animals suited to that nutritional profile; and 3) alternative feeding practices may allow producers to efficiently capitalize on the agency of animals, thus reducing illness and improving performance.
Authors:
S B Atwood; F D Provenza; R D Wiedmeier; R E Banner
Related Documents :
16362607 - Effect of natural antioxidants on superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase mrna ...
10638797 - Effects of fasciola gigantica infection on growth and nutrient utilisation of buffalo c...
24115757 - Epicardial fat thickness and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in obese subjects.
895407 - Type and amount of dietary fat affect relative concentration of cholesterol in blood an...
835727 - Exercise, dietary obesity, and growth in the rat.
12623777 - Elevated dietary salt suppresses renin secretion but not thirst evoked by arterial hypo...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of animal science     Volume:  79     ISSN:  0021-8812     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Anim. Sci.     Publication Date:  2001 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-01-28     Completed Date:  2002-05-14     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8003002     Medline TA:  J Anim Sci     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  3034-40     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Rangeland Resources, Utah State University, Logan 84322, USA. Stan@cc.usu.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Animal Feed / economics*
Animals
Cattle / physiology*
Choice Behavior / physiology*
Diet / veterinary*
Dietary Proteins / administration & dosage
Eating / physiology*
Energy Intake / physiology
Female
Food Preferences
Male
Time Factors
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Dietary Proteins

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Changes in preferences of gestating heifers fed untreated or ammoniated straw in different flavors.
Next Document:  Carcass traits and microsatellite distributions in offspring of sires from three geographical region...