|The influence of endocrine disrupting chemicals on the proliferation of ERalpha knockdown-human breast cancer cell line MCF-7; new attempts by RNAi technology.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 19492024 Owner: NLM Status: PubMed-not-MEDLINE|
|Bisphenol A (BPA) is a monomer use in manufacturing a wide range of chemical products which include epoxy resins and polycarbonate. It has been reported that BPA increases the cell proliferation activity of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells as well as 17-beta estradiol (E2) and diethylstilbestrol (DES). However, BPA induces target genes through ER-dependent and ER-independent manners which are different from the actions induced by E2. Therefore, BPA may be unique in estrogen-dependent cell proliferation compared to other endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). In the present study, to test whether ERalpha is essential to the BPA-induced proliferation on MCF-7 cells, we suppressed the ERalpha expression of MCF-7 cells by RNA interference (RNAi). Proliferation effects in the presence of E2, DES and BPA were not observed in ERalpha-knockdown MCF-7 cells in comparison with control MCF-7. In addition, a marker of proliferative potential, MIB-1 labeling index (LI), showed no change in BPA-treated groups compared with vehicle-treated groups on ERalpha-knockdown MCF-7 cells. In conclusion, we demonstrated that ERalpha has a role in BPA-induced cell proliferation as well as E2 and DES. Moreover, this study indicated that the direct knockdown of ERalpha using RNAi serves as an additional tool to evaluate, in parallel with MCF-7 cell proliferation assay, for potential EDCs.|
|Takashi Miyakoshi; Katsuhiro Miyajima; Susumu Takekoshi; Robert Yoshiyuki Osamura|
Related Documents :
|9459194 - Steroid metabolism in the hormone dependent mcf-7 human breast carcinoma cell line and ...
20692244 - A novel anticancer agent, retigeric acid b, displays proliferation inhibition, s phase ...
6256064 - Receptor characteristics of the rat mammary carcinoma cell line 64-24.
20652934 - Silencing the metallothionein-2a gene induces entosis in adherent mcf-7 breast cancer c...
3098874 - Intracellular distribution of 73,000 and 72,000 dalton heat shock proteins in hela cells.
23449394 - Shaping organisms with apoptosis.
|Type: Journal Article Date: 2009-04-03|
|Title: Acta histochemica et cytochemica Volume: 42 ISSN: 0044-5991 ISO Abbreviation: Acta Histochem Cytochem Publication Date: 2009 Apr|
|Created Date: 2009-06-03 Completed Date: 2009-06-17 Revised Date: 2013-05-23|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 0147110 Medline TA: Acta Histochem Cytochem Country: Japan|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 23-8 Citation Subset: -|
|Department of Pathology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Acta Histochem Cytochem
Journal ID (publisher-id): AHC
Publisher: Japan Society of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Tokyo, Japan
? 2009 The Japan Society of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry
open-access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received Day: 31 Month: 10 Year: 2008
Accepted Day: 9 Month: 12 Year: 2008
Print publication date: Day: 28 Month: 4 Year: 2009
Electronic publication date: Day: 3 Month: 4 Year: 2009
Volume: 42 Issue: 2
First Page: 23 Last Page: 28
PubMed Id: 19492024
Publisher Id: AHC08036
|The Influence of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals on the Proliferation of ER? Knockdown-Human Breast Cancer Cell Line MCF-7; New Attempts by RNAi Technology|
|Robert Yoshiyuki Osamura1|
1Department of Pathology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259?1193, Japan
|Correspondence: Correspondence to: Robert Yoshiyuki Osamura, M.D., Department of Pathology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya Isehara, Kanagawa 259?1193, Japan. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a known endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC) that is a major component of epoxy and polycarbonate resin, which is widely used as an ingredient in the protective coatings on food containers and as adhesives used in packaging products [1, 8, 16]. It has been reported that BPA has weak estrogen activity approximately 1/1000- to 1/10,000-fold of 17-? estradiol (E2) , and interacts with estrogen receptors alpha (ER?) and beta (ER?) [7, 10, 12]. Exposure of BPA induces the expression of progesterone receptor, and promoted MCF-7 breast cancer cell proliferation [9, 16, 21, 23, 25]. In experiments with rodents, exposure of high doses of BPA has been reported to induce reproductive toxicity and abnormal cellular development .
Between the 1940s to the 1970s, diethylstilbestrol (DES), a potent synthetic estrogen, was prescribed to prevent complications of pregnancy . Prenatal DES exposure in women is known to cause genital abnormalities and carcinomas . Perinatal exposure of laboratory mice to DES also elicits a spectrum of reproductive tract lesions .
Estrogens regulate many physiological processes, including normal cell proliferation, development, and tissue-specific gene regulation in the reproductive tract and in the central nervous and skeletal systems. Estrogens also influence the pathological processes of hormone-dependent diseases, such as breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancers, as well as osteoporosis. The biological actions of estrogens are mediated by binding to one of two specific estrogen receptors (ERs), ER? or ER?, which belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily [11, 31]. The biological significance of the existence of two ER? and ER? subtypes is at this moment unclear [17, 18].
Studies on estrogenic effects of EDCs have been mainly performed by MCF-7 cell proliferation assay (E-screen assay), ER reporter gene assay or yeast assays [3, 6, 25]. Interestingly, BPA exhibits characteristics of a distinct molecular mechanism of action at ER?, with BPA interacting differently within the ligand-binding domain compared with E2 . In addition, BPA induces target genes through ER-dependent and ER-independent manners which are different from the actions induced by E2 [23, 24]. Therefore, BPA may be unique in estrogen-dependent cell proliferation compared to other EDCs. In the present study, to investigate whether ER? participate in the BPA-induced cell proliferation as well as E2 and DES, we performed the suppression of ER? expression in MCF-7 cells by RNAi.
17?-estradiol and diethylstilbestrol were purchased from Wako Pure Chemicals Industries, Ltd. (Wako, Osaka, Japan). Bisphenol A was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). The chemicals were solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma) and the control culture was exposed to a culture medium containing 0.1% DMSO.
Human ER? gene sequence-specific shRNA expression vector, piER? was constructed by iGENE (Tokyo, Japan) using piGENE-PUR-hU6 with resistant characteristics of ampicillin and puromycin. The piER? shRNA sequence was as follows: 5'-TTGTGTTTCAACATTCTCC-3' (the target sequence is located in the exon 4 of ER? cDNA).
In this study, we employed ER-positive human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and BT474 which have been shown to transiently induce the expression of EGFR mRNA and protein because they were estrogen responsive . BT474 cells were chosen as the less responsive ones to estrogen stimulation. MCF-7 was kindly provided by Dr. Ichirou Mori (Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan), and BT474 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). They were grown in Dulbecco?s modified Eagle?s medium (GIBCO, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Twenty-four hr before treatment, cell culture medium was replaced with phenol red-free Dulbecco?s modified Eagle?s medium (GIBCO) containing 10% dextran-coated charcoal treated fetal bovine serum. MCF-7 and BT474 cells were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 2?104 cells/well and cultured further with or without 10?10~10?6 M of E2, 10?10~10?6 M of DES, or 10?8~10?4 M of BPA for 96 hr, and then the cell number was measured with the cell counting kit-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan).
MCF-7 cells were transfected with piER? vector or empty vector. Twenty-four hr before transfection, cell culture medium was replaced with phenol red-free Dulbecco?s modified Eagle?s medium (GIBCO) containing 10% dextran-coated charcoal treated fetal bovine serum. The cells were transfected with 2 ?g of indicated plasmids using 5 ?l of FuGENE HD transfection regent (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). After 24 hr of transfection, the cells were cultured with 2 ?g/ml puromycin for 48 hr. At the end of incubation, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), dead cells were removed from culture flask. Living cells were seeded in 24-well plates at density of 5?104 and cultured further with or without 10?10~10?6 M of E2, 10?10~10?6 M of DES, or 10?8~10?4 M of BPA for 96 hr.
Total cellular RNA was isolated by the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer?s recommended protocol. One ?g of total RNA was converted to double-stranded cDNA using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Real-time RT-PCR analysis was done using a DNA Opticon system (MJ Research, Waltham, MA, USA). The level of ER? expression was normalized relative to that of the internal control, the ?-actin gene. The reaction protocol consisted of the following cycles: 95?C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 94?C for 10 sec, 60?C for 15 sec, and 72?C for 15 sec, followed by 72?C for 5 min. Primers for PCR amplification were as follows: ER? forward, 5'-TGGAGATCTTCGACATGCTG-3'/reverse 5'-TCCAGAGACTTCAGGGTGCT-3', ?-actin, 5'-CCCAGCACAATGAAGATCAA-3'/reverse, 5'-ACATCTGCTGGAAGGTGGAC-3'.
For immunostaining of ER?, the cells were cultured in two-well permanox slides, and were washed with PBS and fixed by 10% buffered formalin for 30 min. Cells were pretreated by boiling in Target Retrieval solution High pH (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) for 40 min. After peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.03% H2O2 for 15 min, cells were treated consecutively at room temperature with mouse anti-ER? (1D5; DAKO) diluted at 1:50 for 1 hr, and the signal was amplified with DAKO ENVISION+ kit (DAKO) according to the manufacturer?s recommendations. Immunoreactivity was visualized by incubation with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride. Finally, cells were counterstained with hematoxylin.
Intact MCF-7 cells, empty vector transfected-MCF-7 cells and ER?-knockdown MCF-7 cells were incubated with either BPA 10?5 M or vehicle control (0.1% DMSO) in cell-chamber for 96 hr. At the end of incubation, the cells were washed with PBS and fixed by 10% buffered formalin for 30 min. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.03% H2O2 for 15 min, and cells were permeabilized (0.4% Tween20, 1% normal horse serum in PBS for 1 hr) and then incubated for 1 hr at room temperature with mouse anti-Ki-67 (MIB-1; DAKO) diluted at 1:50. The signal was amplified with DAKO ENVISION+ kit (DAKO) according to the manufacturer?s recommendations. Immunoreactivity was visualized by incubation with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride. Finally, cells were counterstained with hematoxylin. The MIB-1 LI was defined as the percentage of immunostained cells divided by the total number of cells in the evaluated area. All counts were performed at a magnification of ?400 using an ocular graticule consisting of 10?10=100 fields covering an area of 0.0625 mm2. Ten viable fields from the area of maximal labeling were chosen for counting. A thousand to 5000 cells were counted from each specimen.
Data are presented as means?standard deviation (SD) of more or three independent experiments. The differences between each treated value were evaluated by analysis of variance and Student?s t-test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The human breast cancer MCF-7 and BT474 cells were treated for 96 hr with a concentration of 10?10 M~10?6 M of E2, 10?10 M~10?6 M of DES or 10?8 M~10?4 M of BPA. In the cell proliferation of MCF-7, a significant increase was detectable at concentration of 10?10 M~10?6 M of E2, 10?10 M~10?6 M of DES and 10?6 M and 10?5 M of BPA as compared with vehicle groups (0.1% DMSO) (Fig.?1). In the cell proliferation of BT474, a significant increase was not detected in any dose of E2-, DES- and BPA-treated groups compared with vehicle groups (0.1% DMSO) (Fig.?1). The expression level of ER? of MCF-7 and BT474 were examined by real-time RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry analysis (Fig.?2), the MCF-7 ER? mRNA was highly expressed approximately 2.6-fold compared with BT474; these results were further supported by immunocytochemistry analysis.
First, we evaluated the effect of RNAi-mediated knockdown of ER?; the degree of knockdown was assessed by real-time RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry analysis. Transfection of the ER? shRNA expression vector was observed to be significantly decreased by 3.1-fold compared with empty vector-transfected MCF-7; these results were further supported by immunocytochemistry analysis (Fig.?3). The cell proliferation of ER?-knockdown MCF-7 was not detected in any dose of E2, DES and BPA (Fig.?4). As another index for the cell proliferation activity, MIB-1 LI was analyzed by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. The MIB-1 LI of intact MCF-7 (1.8?0.07-fold) and empty vector-transfected MCF-7 (2.4?0.1-fold) with 10?5 M of BPA were significantly increased as compared with vehicle-treated groups. In contrast, the MIB-1 LI of ER?-knockdown MCF-7 showed no change in BPA-treated groups (0.9?0.3-fold) (Fig.?5).
The biological effects of BPA have been widely studied over the past several decades. It has been reported that BPA can exert some of its effects by binding at the ER? or ER? to induce estrogenic signals that modify estrogen-responsive gene expression [7, 10, 12]. However, in vitro effects of BPA might be different in individual cell types, including possible ER-independent actions [23, 27]. Although a major mechanism of BPA action is ER-regulated gene expression through the estrogen responsive element (ERE), high concentrations of BPA could regulate expression of growth- and development-related genes different from E2 in MCF-7 cells stably expressing HA-tagged ER? , indicating that BPA is unique in estrogen-dependent cell proliferation compared to other EDCs. In the present study, we demonstrated that the proliferation effects were induced in exposure of MCF-7 to BPA, which were dependent on the presence of functional ER? as well as E2- and DES-action.
The MCF-7 cell line is a human breast cancer cell line which possesses ERs and has been widely used as valuable materials in environmental toxicology. As shown in Figure?1, BPA-treated MCF-7 cells were shown to have lower cell proliferation in comparison to E2 and DES, but cell proliferation was not observed in BT474 cells with these stimuli. The effective doses of these EDCs were consistent with previous evidence [8, 20, 22]. To examine the reason for differential effects of cell proliferation between MCF-7 cells and BT474 cells, the ER? expression level was examined by real-time RT-PCR and immunocytochemical analysis. It was shown that the proliferative effects to these EDCs were correlated with ER? content between MCF-7 cells and BT474 cells, suggesting that regulation of ER? concentration may be a key component in estrogen responsiveness of target cells. Therefore, in this study, to investigate whether ER? is essential to the BPA-induced cell proliferation as well as E2 and DES, we carried out specific inhibition of the ER? gene using RNAi mediated by ER?-shRNA vector in MCF-7. As shown in Figure?4, we found that the cell proliferation of MCF-7 with BPA, E2 and DES was obviously inhibited by knockdown of ER?. As another index for the cell proliferation activity, the Ki-67 antigen is widely known as a cell growth marker [4, 26]. MIB-1 LI of ER?-knockdown MCF-7 cells showed no change by incubation with BPA. It is possible that ER?-mediated gene expression results in the BPA-induced cell proliferation of MCF-7. On the other hand, BPA was shown to exert both agonistic and antagonistic effects through ER? while behaving exclusively as an agonist through ER? . Although intact MCF-7 expressed both ER? and ER? in our studies, the BPA-induced cell proliferations were inhibited only by ER?-knockdown, suggesting that ER? plays no important role in BPA-induced cell proliferation, but this remains to be further investigated.
In this study, we carried out specific inhibition of the ER? gene using RNAi mediated by ER?-shRNA vector in MCF-7 for the following reasons. It has been reported that specific gene silencing using shRNA-expressed vector can provided stable suppression of a target gene by antibiotic selection in mammalian cells [14, 19]. Indeed, immunocytochemical analysis in our study showed that a reduction of ER? was observed in ER?-shRNA vector, but not in control vector. It was shown that gene suppression by shRNA vector was a useful method for long-term estrogenicity tests. However, the ER? expressions were not completely inhibited in ER?-knockdown MCF-7 cells, and few ER? expressions were observed in the cytoplasm of these cells (as shown in Fig.?3B). It may be due to low transfection efficiency of piER? shRNA vector in MCF-7 cells.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that ER? has an important role in BPA-induced cell proliferation, as well as E2 and DES. Moreover, this study indicated that the knockdown of ER? using RNAi serves as additional tool for evaluating, in parallel with E-screen assay, for potential EDCs.
The authors wish to thank Hideo Tsukamoto from the Teaching and Research Support Center, Tokai University School of Medicine for his technical support.
|1.||Biedermann M.,Grob K.. 1998;Food contamination from epoxy resins and organosols used as can coatings: Analysis by gradient NPLCFood Addit. Contam. 15:609–618. [pmid: 9829047]|
|2.||Bornstein J.,Adam E.,Adler-Storthz K.,Kaufman R. H.. 1988;Development of cervical and vaginal squamous cell neoplasia as a late consequence of in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrolObstet. Gynecol. Surv. 43:15–21. [pmid: 2829071]|
|3.||Brotons J. A.,Olea-Serrano M. F.,Villalobos M.,Pedraza V.,Olea N.. 1995;Xenoestrogens released from lacquer coatings in food cansEnviron. Health Perspect. 103:608–612. [pmid: 7556016]|
|4.||Gentil Perret A.,Mosnier J. F.,Buono J. P.,Berthelot P.,Chipponi J.,Balique J. G.,Cuilleret J.,Dechelotte P.,Boucheron S.. 1998;The relationship between MIB-1 proliferation index and outcome in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsAm. J. Clin. Pathol. 109:286–293. [pmid: 9495200]|
|5.||Gould J. C.,Leonard L. S.,Maness S. C.,Wagner B. L.,Conner K.,Zacharewski T.,Safe S.,McDonnell D. P.,Gaido K. W.. 1998;Bisphenol A interacts with the estrogen receptor alpha in a distinct manner from estradiolMol. Cell Endocrinol. 142:203–214. [pmid: 9783916]|
|6.||Harris C. A.,Henttu P.,Parker M. G.,Sumpter J. P.. 1997;The estrogenic activity of phthalate esters in vitroEnviron. Health Perspect. 105:802–811. [pmid: 9347895]|
|7.||Hiroi H.,Tsutsumi O.,Momoeda M.,Takai Y.,Osuga Y.,Taketani Y.. 1999;Differential interactions of bisphenol A and 17 beta-estradiol with estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and ERbetaEndocrine J. 46:773–778. [pmid: 10724352]|
|8.||Kim H. S.,Han S. Y.,Yoo S. D.,Lee B. M.,Park K. L.. 2001;Potential estrogenic effects of bisphenol A estimated by in vitro and in vivo combination assaysJ. Toxicol. Sci. 26:111–118. [pmid: 11552294]|
|9.||Krishnan A. V.,Stathis P.,Permuth S. F.,Tokes L.,Feldman D.. 1993;Bisphenol-A: an estrogenic substance is released from polycarbonate flasks during autoclavingEndocrinology 132:2279–2286. [pmid: 8504731]|
|10.||Kurosawa T.,Hiroi H.,Tsutsumi O.,Ishikawa T.,Osuga Y.,Fujiwara T.,Inoue S.,Muramatsu M.,Momoeda M.,Taketani Y.. 2002;The activity of bisphenol A depends on both the estrogen receptor subtype and the cell typeEndocrine J. 49:465–471. [pmid: 12402979]|
|11.||Matthews J.,Gustafsson J. A.. 2003;Estrogen signaling: a subtle balance between ER alpha and ER betaMol. Interv. 3:281–292. [pmid: 14993442]|
|12.||Matthews J. B.,Twomey K.,Zacharewski T. R.. 2001;In vitro and in vivo interactions of bisphenol A and its metabolite, bisphenol A glucuronide, with estrogen receptors alpha and betaChem. Res. Toxicol. 14:149–157. [pmid: 11258963]|
|13.||McLachlan J. A.,Newbold R. R.,Bullock B. C.. 1980;Long-term effects on the female mouse genital tract associated with prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrolCancer Res. 40:3988–3999. [pmid: 7193511]|
|14.||Miyai S.,Itoh J.,Kajiya H.,Takekoshi S.,Osamura R. Y.. 2005;Pit-1 gene inhibition using small interfering RNAs in rat pituitary GH secreting cell lineActa Histochem. Cytochem. 38:107–114.|
|15.||Morrissey R. E.,George J. D.,Price C. J.,Tyl R. W.,Marr M. C.,Kimmel C. A.. 1987;The developmental toxicity of bisphenol A in rats and miceFundam. Appl. Toxicol. 8:571–582. [pmid: 3609543]|
|16.||Nagel S. C.,vom Saal F. S.,Thayer K. A.,Dhar M. G.,Boechler M.,Welshons W. V.. 1997;Relative binding affinity-serum modified access (RBA-SMA) assay predicts the relative in vivo bioactivity of the xenoestrogens bisphenol A and octylphenolEnviron. Health Perspect. 105:70–76. [pmid: 9074884]|
|17.||Nilsson S.,M?kel? S.,Treuter E.,Tujague M.,Thomsen J.,Andersson G.,Enmark E.,Pettersson K.,Warner M.,Gustafsson J. A.. 2001;Mechanisms of estrogen actionPhysiol. Rev. 81:1535–1565. [pmid: 11581496]|
|18.||Oshima Y.,Matsuda K.,Yoshida A.,Watanabe N.,Kawata M.,Kubo T.. 2007;Localization of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in the articular surface of the rat femurActa Histochem. Cytochem. 40:27–34. [pmid: 17375206]|
|19.||Paddison P. J.,Caudy A. A.,Bernstein E.,Hannon G. J.,Conklin D. S.. 2002;Short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) induce sequence-specific silencing in mammalian cellsGenes Dev. 16:948–958. [pmid: 11959843]|
|20.||Perez P.,Pulgar R.,Olea-Serrano F.,Villalobos M.,Rivas A.,Metzler M.,Pedraza V.,Olea N.. 1998;The estrogenicity of bisphenol A-related diphenylalkanes with various substituents at the central carbon and the hydroxy groupsEnviron. Health Perspect. 106:167–174. [pmid: 9449681]|
|21.||Ramos J. G.,Varayoud J.,Sonnenschein C.,Soto A. M.,Mu?oz De Toro M.,Luque E. H.. 2001;Prenatal exposure to low doses of bisphenol A alters the periductal stroma and glandular cell function in the rat ventral prostateBiol. Reprod. 65:1271–1277. [pmid: 11566753]|
|22.||Schafer T. E.,Lapp C. A.,Hanes C. M.,Lewis J. B.,Wataha J. C.,Schuster G. S.. 1999;Estrogenicity of bisphenol A and bisphenol A dimethacrylate in vitroJ. Biomed. Mater. Res. 45:192–197. [pmid: 10397975]|
|23.||Singleton D. W.,Feng Y.,Chen Y.,Busch S. J.,Lee A. V.,Puga A.,Khan S. A.. 2004;Bisphenol-A and estradiol exert novel gene regulation in human MCF-7 derived breast cancer cellsMol. Cell Endocrinol. 221:47–55. [pmid: 15223131]|
|24.||Singleton D. W.,Feng Y.,Yang J.,Puga A.,Lee A. V.,Khan S. A.. 2006;Gene expression profiling reveals novel regulation by bisphenol-A in estrogen receptor-alpha-positive human cellsEnviron. Res. 100:86–92. [pmid: 16029874]|
|25.||Soto A. M.,Sonnenschein C.,Chung K. L.,Fernandez M. F.,Olea N.,Serrano F. O.. 1995;The E-SCREEN assay as a tool to identify estrogens: an update on estrogenic environmental pollutantsEnviron. Health Perspect. 103:113–122. [pmid: 8593856]|
|26.||Takeshita K.,Murata S.,Mitsufuji S.,Wakabayashi N.,Kataoka K.,Tsuchihashi Y.,Okanoue T.. 2006;Clinicopathological characteristics of esophageal squamous papillomas in Japanese patients?with comparison of findings from western countriesActa Histochem. Cytochem. 39:23–30. [pmid: 17460769]|
|27.||Wetherill Y. B.,Akingbemi B. T.,Kanno J.,McLachlan J. A.,Nadal A.,Sonnenschein C.,Watson C. S.,Zoeller R. T.,Belcher S. M.. 2007;In vitro molecular mechanisms of bisphenol A actionReprod. Toxicol. 24:178–198. [pmid: 17628395]|
|28.||Wilcox A. J.,Baird D. D.,Weinberg C. R.,Hornsby P. P.,Herbst A. L.. 1995;Fertility in men exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrolN. Engl. J. Med. 332:1411–1416. [pmid: 7723797]|
|29.||Witorsch R. J.. 2002;Low-dose in utero effects of xenoestrogens in mice and their relevance to humans; an analytical review of the literatureFood Chem. Toxicol. 40:905–912. [pmid: 12065211]|
|30.||Yarden R. I.,Lauber A. H.,El-Ashry D.,Chrysogelos S. A.. 1996;Bimodal regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor by estrogen in breast cancer cellsEndocrinology 137:2739–2747. [pmid: 8770893]|
|31.||Yoshida M.,Nishi M.,Kizaki Z.,Sawada T.,Kawata M.. 2002;. Subcellular and subnuclear distributions of estrogen receptor ? in living cells using green fluorescent protein and immunohistochemistryActa Histochem. Cytochem. 34:413–422.|
Keywords: Bisphenol A (BPA), estrogen receptor ? (ER?), RNA interference (RNAi), MCF-7, cell proliferation.
Previous Document: Improvement of in situ PCR by optimization of PCR cycle number and proteinase k concentration: local...
Next Document: Glutamate receptors GluR1 and GluR4 in the hamster superior colliculus: distribution and co-localiza...