Document Detail


Influence of an auxiliary facet system on lumbar spine biomechanics.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20479698     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
STUDY DESIGN.: In vitro biomechanical study investigating L4-L5 kinematics and intradiscal pressure (IDP) with a facet replacement system. OBJECTIVE.: To assess the influence of the Auxiliary Facet System (AFS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Posterior dynamic systems are used in the treatment of low back pain to avoid adjacent segment degeneration. Facet replacement systems are supposed to stabilize a lumbar segment after facetectomy and neural decompression, and to provide an intersegmental range of motion (ROM). METHODS.: The AFS is fixed by 4 pedicle screws, linked by 2 angulated rods, a polyaxial connector, and a crosslink. Flexibility tests were conducted on 6 human cadaver specimens (L3-S1) using a load testing device and the Polaris system. The specimens were loaded by steps of 1 Nm to 10 Nm in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The following configurations were investigated: intact segment, instrumented, instrumented plus medial facetectomy, and facetectomy alone. The sagittal mean center of rotation (MCR) was calculated, and IDPs were measured in flexion/extension. RESULTS.: The ROM of the intact segment was 10.9° (9.4°-15.5°) in flexion/extension, 9.5° (6.8°-12.1°) in lateral bending, and 4.7° (3.4°-6.0°) degrees in axial rotation. Medial facetectomy and instrumentation led to -6% of ROM in flexion/extension and +1% lateral bending. Medial facetectomy without implant led to +106% of axial rotation (P = 0.028). The instrumentation reduced axial rotation to -38% (P = 0.028). This decrease was because of the presence of the cross-link. The MCR was located around the middle of the superior L5 endplate in intact and instrumented specimens. It moved cranial after facetectomy without instrumentation. The implant decreased the maximal IDP during flexion/extension to -17% (P = 0.028). CONCLUSION.: The AFS had a minor influence on flexion/extension and lateral bending, and the MCR kept physiologic. Bilateral facetectomy yielded an increase in axial rotation, which was stabilized by the implant. The AFS seemed to reduce IDPs.
Authors:
Yann Philippe Charles; Sylvain Persohn; Jean-Paul Steib; Christian Mazel; Wafa Skalli
Related Documents :
18274858 - Radiographic method to measure the inclination angle of the acetabulum.
11426168 - Radiographic spinal profile changes induced by cage design after posterior lumbar inter...
2688488 - Ambiguities of angle's classification.
17085918 - Cold-provocation testing for the vascular component of hand-arm vibration syndrome in h...
3881378 - A comparison of ciliary sulcus and capsular bag fixation of posterior chamber intraocul...
9105148 - Effects of polyvalent alcohol solutions as dentine primers.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Spine     Volume:  36     ISSN:  1528-1159     ISO Abbreviation:  Spine     Publication Date:  2011 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-04-12     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7610646     Medline TA:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  690-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
*Laboratoire de Biomécanique, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Paris †Service de Chirurgie du Rachis, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg ‡Département de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of patients with idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study of ...
Next Document:  Efficacy of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate ceramic in posterolateral instrumented lumbar fus...