Document Detail


Inference with legal evidence: common sense is necessary, but not sufficient.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15296239     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Recent cases have highlighted the issue of faulty probabilistic reasoning by expert witnesses in courts of law. While concern about potential miscarriages of justice is clearly well-placed, the consequences of such faulty reasoning do not seem to be fully appreciated. These are often counter-intuitive, as we show with two examples: the Interrogator's Fallacy and the Prosecutor's Fallacy. Both demonstrate the danger of relying solely on 'common sense' when drawing inferences from legal evidence.
Authors:
Robert A J Matthews
Related Documents :
10134149 - The path to successful mrp (materiel requirements planning) package selection.
16544419 - New zealand: sections of city by-law effectively prohibiting small owner-operated broth...
12289249 - Judgment, may 1988.
10134839 - Physician-assisted suicide. legal rulings skirt around ethics of aid-in-dying.
3365479 - United states v. lyons: toward a new conception of legal insanity.
16777109 - Legal and ethical issues in telemedicine and robotics.
20740639 - Genetics and women's health issues--the commitment of ems to women scientists and gende...
21174049 - Developing the international society of physical and rehabilitation medicine (isprm): f...
14984219 - Medicolegal issues in paediatric practice: proceedings of the 4th northern regional pae...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Legal Cases    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Medicine, science, and the law     Volume:  44     ISSN:  0025-8024     ISO Abbreviation:  Med Sci Law     Publication Date:  2004 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-08-05     Completed Date:  2004-11-24     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0400721     Medline TA:  Med Sci Law     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  189-92     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Information Engineering, Aston University, Birmingham. r.matthews@physics.org
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Criminal Law / standards*
Forensic Medicine / standards*
Humans
Lawyers / statistics & numerical data
Probability

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Multiscale simulations of carbon nanotube nucleation and growth: mesoscopic continuum calculations.
Next Document:  An evaluation of psychiatric support to magistrates' courts.