Document Detail

Indications for treatment of recurrent carotid stenosis.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23288608     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
BACKGROUND: There is significant variation in the indications for intervention in patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis. The aim of the present study was to describe these indications in a contemporary cohort of patients. METHODS: This was a systematic review of all peer-reviewed studies reporting on the indications for carotid intervention in patients with recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) that were published between 1990 and 2012. RESULTS: There were 50 studies reporting on a total of 3524 patients undergoing a carotid procedure; of these, 3478 underwent CEA as the initial intervention. Reintervention was by CEA in 2403 patients and by CAS in 1121. Only 54·7 per cent of the patients were treated for any symptoms and, importantly, just 444 (23·1 per cent of 1926 symptomatic patients) underwent intervention for documented ipsilateral symptoms. None of the studies reported whether the patients were evaluated for other sources of emboli. The remaining 45·3 per cent of patients had asymptomatic restenosis and in the majority of the studies were treated when the degree of stenosis exceeded 80 per cent. The time to repeat intervention was significantly longer in patients with recurrent atherosclerosis, in asymptomatic patients and in patients undergoing CEA. CONCLUSION: The reported criteria for retreatment of carotid stenosis were not rigorous and there is still significant ambiguity surrounding the indications for intervention. Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
K Bekelis; Z Moses; S Missios; A Desai; N Labropoulos
Related Documents :
24237478 - Association between reduced kidney function and clinical outcomes after ischaemic strok...
23112578 - Prevalence and risk factors associated with peripheral artery disease in elderly patien...
24065498 - Impaired coronary flow reserve in metastatic cancer patients treated with sunitinib.
23578038 - Interstitial cells of cajal in slow transit constipation and megabowel.
17909158 - Differences and similarities between atypical facial pain and trigeminal neuropathic pain.
17354028 - High incidence of tracheomalacia in longstanding goiters: experience from an endemic go...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-1-3
Journal Detail:
Title:  The British journal of surgery     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1365-2168     ISO Abbreviation:  Br J Surg     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-1-4     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372553     Medline TA:  Br J Surg     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Section of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  The Eastland Prostate Cancer Survey: Instrument Development and Psychometric Testing.
Next Document:  Symmetrical lipomatosis of the tongue-A rare cause of macroglossia: Diagnosis, surgical treatment, a...