Document Detail


Indexes of contrast and quantitative significance for comparisons of two groups.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10495454     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Although boundaries for 'large' and 'small' differences are needed to plan research and interpret results, the diverse indexes of descriptive contrast for the central indexes, A and B, of two groups, have not received intensive attention. For two means, the increment of mid R:A-Bmid R: reflects the slope of a line showing the 'effect', but is altered by different units of measurement. Division of mid R:A-Bmid R: by the common standard deviation produces the standardized increment (SI), which is sometimes called the 'effect size'. Despite many advant ages, it does not contrast the relative magnitudes of A and B. For the latter contrast, the relative change or proportionate increment (mid R:A-Bmid R:/B) is particularly easy to understand, and the relative translocation (mid R:A-Bmid R:/[A+B]) produces a bounded range from -1 to +1. Nevertheless, all indexes of relative magnitude ablate the scales of measurement, thereby increasing difficulty in interpretation. Although seldom applied, proportionate reduction in overall system variance can be highly useful. Its square root leads to eta, the analogue of a correlation coefficient, which corresponds to a standardized slope for the direct increment. The values of eta usually approximate (SI)/2. Although arbitrary levels have been proposed for 'quantitative significance' of the SI, the proportionate reduction in overall system variance is often regarded as ineffectual unless >/=10 per cent. With this belief, minimum boundaries for quantitative significance can often be set at eta>/=0.3 and SI>/=0.6. In indexes of relative magnitude for two proportions (or rates), p(A) and p(B), confusion is produced if q(A) and q(B) are alternatively chosen for the denominators. The odds ratio, (p(A) q(B)/p(B) q(A)), avoids these choices, but is often difficult to interpret. For easy understanding and communication, the preferred index is NNE, the number needed to produce one excess effect, calculated as the inverse of the direct increment, that is, 1/mid R:p(A)-p(B)mid R: The standardized increment, mid R:p(A)-p(B)mid R:/ radical(PQ), (where P is the average of p(A) and p(B) and Q=1-P) could offer a single index applicable to both dimensional and binary data, but when P becomes quite small, that is, <0.01, radical(PQ) requires special calculations and also approaches the value of radicalP. Boundaries of 'quantitative significance' are particularly difficult to establish for comparisons of two rates, because of additional consequences in populational extrapolations and clinical implications. Nevertheless, the principles of quantitative significance can aid the ad hoc construction of boundaries that must be set for medical importance when sample sizes are calculated and when results are interpreted for studies of either efficacy or equivalence.
Authors:
A R Feinstein
Related Documents :
3853484 - Estimating variance components with bmdp for analyses of technical reliability.
21816684 - Monte carlo calculations of aapm task group report no. 43 dosimetry parameters for the ...
17246484 - Design and analysis of experiments on random drift and inbreeding depression.
22255474 - A new spatially constrained nmf with application to fmri.
6498264 - Analysis of fluorescence decay kinetics from variable-frequency phase shift and modulat...
20302674 - Mapping malaria incidence distribution that accounts for environmental factors in maput...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Statistics in medicine     Volume:  18     ISSN:  0277-6715     ISO Abbreviation:  Stat Med     Publication Date:  1999 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-12-23     Completed Date:  1999-12-23     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8215016     Medline TA:  Stat Med     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2557-81     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Clinical Trials as Topic
Data Interpretation, Statistical*
Epidemiologic Methods
Humans
Research Design
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Stat Med. 1999 Oct 15;18(19):2585-9; discussion 2591-2   [PMID:  10495456 ]
Stat Med. 1999 Oct 15;18(19):2551-5   [PMID:  10495453 ]
Stat Med. 1999 Oct 15;18(19):2583-4; discussion 2591-2   [PMID:  10495455 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Cellular events and the pattern of p53 protein expression following cyclophosphamide-initiated cell ...
Next Document:  Examining the minimum important difference.