Document Detail


Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multiobserver study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21084409     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To quantify the changes in reader performance levels, if any, during interpretation of computed tomographic (CT) colonographic data when a computer-aided detection (CAD) system is used as a second or concurrent reader.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval was obtained, 16 experienced radiologists searched for polyps in 112 patients, 56 of whom had 132 polyps. Each case was interpreted on three separate occasions by using an unassisted (without CAD), second-read CAD, or concurrent CAD reading paradigm. The reading paradigm and case order were randomized, with a minimal interval of 1 month between consecutive interpretations. The readers' findings were compared with the reference-truth interpretation. The mean per-patient sensitivity and mean per-patient specificity with CAD were compared with those achieved with unassisted reading. An increase in per-patient sensitivity was considered to be clinically more important than an equivalent decrease in specificity.
RESULTS: The mean per-patient sensitivity for identification of patients with polyps of any size increased significantly with use of second-read CAD (mean increase, 7.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0%, 9.8%) and concurrent CAD (mean increase, 4.5%; 95% CI: 0.8%, 8.2%). The mean per-patient specificity did not decrease significantly with use of second-read CAD (mean decrease, -2.5%; 95% CI: -5.2%, 0.1%) or concurrent CAD (mean decrease, -2.2%; 95% CI: -4.6%, 0.2%). With analysis restricted to patients with polyps 6 mm or larger, the benefit in sensitivity with second-read CAD remained (mean increase, 7.1%; 95% CI: 3.0%, 11.1%), whereas the increase with concurrent CAD was not significant (mean increase, 4.2%; 95% CI: -0.5%, 8.9%). Use of second-read CAD significantly increased the per-polyp sensitivity for polyps 6 mm or larger (mean increase, 9.0%; 98.3% CI: 4.9%, 12.8%) and polyps 5 mm or smaller (mean increase, 5.9%; 98.3% CI: 3.2%, 9.1%), but use of concurrent CAD increased the per-polyp sensitivity for only those polyps 5 mm or smaller (mean increase, 4.8%; 98.3% CI: 2.2%, 7.9%).
CONCLUSION: Use of second-read CAD significantly improves readers' per-patient and per-polyp detection. Concurrent CAD is less effective. Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.10100354/-/DC1.
Authors:
Steve Halligan; Susan Mallett; Douglas G Altman; Justine McQuillan; Maria Proud; Gareth Beddoe; Lesley Honeyfield; Stuart A Taylor
Related Documents :
11125869 - Independent determinants of the efficacy of nitrate therapy.
18216379 - Identifying cardiovascular risk factors in a patient population with coronary artery ec...
20926949 - Serum choline levels in patients with stable angina and acute coronary syndromes: relat...
11036119 - Markers of myocardial damage and inflammation in relation to long-term mortality in uns...
10894579 - Safety and efficacy of digital rectal examination in patients with acute myocardial inf...
1530199 - Direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. a review of outcomes in clinical su...
21597869 - Acute hypertensive crisis following octreotide administration in a patient with maligna...
15738829 - Preliminary validation of clinical assessment for deep vein thrombosis in orthopaedic o...
16276139 - Using impedance cardiography to assess left ventricular systolic function via postural ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2010-11-17
Journal Detail:
Title:  Radiology     Volume:  258     ISSN:  1527-1315     ISO Abbreviation:  Radiology     Publication Date:  2011 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-01-28     Completed Date:  2011-03-17     Revised Date:  2014-03-14    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401260     Medline TA:  Radiology     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  469-76     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
© RSNA, 2010
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Colonic Polyps / radiography*
Colonography, Computed Tomographic / methods*
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
RP-PG-0407-10338//Department of Health

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Cellular mechanisms underlying nitric oxide-induced vasodilation of descending vasa recta.
Next Document:  Safety, efficacy, and indications of beta-adrenergic receptor blockade to reduce heart rate prior to...