Document Detail

Increasing fibrillation duration enhances relative asymmetrical biphasic versus monophasic defibrillator waveform efficacy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  2376078     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Biphasic waveforms reduce defibrillation threshold compared with corresponding monophasic waveforms. However, effects of fibrillation duration on relative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms are unknown. This study used a newly developed defibrillation model, the isolated right- and left-sided working rabbit heart, with epicardial defibrillation electrodes, to compare threshold for a monophasic waveform (5 msec rectangular) and an asymmetrical biphasic waveform (5 msec each pulse, V2 = 50% V1). Mean voltage defibrillation threshold (V50) was determined from sigmoidal probability of successful defibrillation versus shock intensity curves after 5, 15, and 30 seconds of fibrillation in a paired study with 10 hearts. Results showed that biphasic waveforms had significantly lower voltage and energy thresholds at all fibrillation durations and that their relative efficacy improved with increasing fibrillation duration. Biphasic voltage threshold was 38.2 +/- 2.2, 44.7 +/- 4.8, and 46.6 +/- 3.2 V after 5, 15, and 30 seconds of fibrillation compared with monophasic thresholds of 51.7 +/- 4.4 (p less than 0.002), 63.0 +/- 7.6 (p less than 0.05), and 72.1 +/- 3.9 V (p less than 0.005). Biphasic waveform energy threshold was 0.67 that for the monophasic waveform after 5 seconds of fibrillation (0.12 +/- 0.01 versus 0.18 +/- 0.03 J, p less than 0.05). The ratio between biphasic waveform threshold and monophasic waveform threshold (B/M) decreased to 0.62 at 15 seconds. At 30 seconds, B/M was 0.52 (0.17 +/- 0.02 versus 0.33 +/- 0.04 J, p less than 0.02). This study also showed that biphasic waveform threshold was a nonlinear function of monophasic waveform threshold so that improved biphasic defibrillator waveform efficacy was greatest for hearts having higher monophasic thresholds.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
J L Jones; J F Swartz; R E Jones; R Fletcher
Related Documents :
25072488 - Planning and executing complex large-scale exercises.
23258478 - Cardiac mri: a new gold standard for ventricular volume quantification during high-inte...
9603538 - Effects of procainamide on wave-front dynamics during ventricular fibrillation in open-...
24570608 - Lactate kinetics during multiple set resistance exercise.
371328 - Correlations of electromyographic silent period duration and the helkimo dysfunction in...
2486118 - Blinking.
Publication Detail:
Type:  In Vitro; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Circulation research     Volume:  67     ISSN:  0009-7330     ISO Abbreviation:  Circ. Res.     Publication Date:  1990 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1990-09-06     Completed Date:  1990-09-06     Revised Date:  2007-11-14    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0047103     Medline TA:  Circ Res     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  376-84     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20037.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Electric Countershock*
Electric Stimulation
Heart / physiopathology*
Heart Ventricles / physiopathology
Time Factors
Ventricular Fibrillation / physiopathology*
Grant Support

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Heterogeneous distribution of a diffusional tracer in the aortic wall of normal and atherosclerotic ...
Next Document:  Differential desensitization of A1 adenosine receptor-mediated inhibition of cardiac myocyte contrac...