Document Detail


Incisional hernia prophylaxis in morbidly obese patients undergoing biliopancreatic diversion.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20853159     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The development of incisional hernia after open bariatric surgery is a major cause of morbidity and hospital readmission. The use of prosthetic material in clean-contaminated procedures remains controversial and correlated to high rate of local complications. A prospective observational clinical study on two different surgical techniques used to close the abdominal wall has been performed to better assess the safety (primary end point) and the efficacy (secondary end point) of polypropylene mesh placement to prevent incisional hernia in morbidly obese patients undergoing biliopancreatic diversion (BPD).
METHODS: Between January 2007 and February 2009, two consecutive series of 25 obese patients, each undergoing BPD, have been analyzed to compare prophylactic retrorectal muscle prosthetic mesh placement with conventional suture repair of the abdominal wall. The first 25 consecutive patients selected to BPD underwent abdominal closure without mesh (group A), and the next 25 consecutive ones have been treated with prophylactic retrorectal muscle prosthetic mesh placement (group B).
RESULTS: No mesh infection occurred in patients in group B. The incidence of minor local complications (seroma or hematoma) was similar in both groups. The incidence of incisional hernia was significantly higher (p = 0.009) in no-mesh group (group A) than in the mesh group (group B) at 1-year follow-up (range, 12 to 24 months). The incidence of incisional hernia was 4% (one case reported) in the group treated with mesh versus an incidence of 32% (eight cases reported) in the group conventionally closed.
CONCLUSIONS: The mesh placement in clean-contaminated bariatric surgery seems to be safe (primary end point) and effective (secondary end point) at 1-year follow-up.
Authors:
Giuseppe Currò; Tommaso Centorrino; Cinzia Musolino; Giuseppe Sarra; Giuseppe Navarra
Related Documents :
20405679 - Acute appendicitis--open or minimally-invasive approach?
23588389 - Guided growth for the treatment of limb length discrepancy: a comparative study of the ...
23524719 - Four-dimensional changes of nasolabial positions in unilateral cleft lip and palate.
24172669 - The efficacy and complications of 2-hole 3.5 mm reconstruction plates and 4 mm noncanul...
18493369 - Laparoscopic presacral neurectomy in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.
23117869 - A histomorphometric study of cellular layers after hemiepiphyseal stapling on the physe...
23111819 - Complications and clinical outcome of hepatic artery embolisation in patients with here...
17961169 - Factor viii inhibitor bypassing activity (feiba) - addressing safety issues.
22677329 - Maxillary advancement with conventional orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Obesity surgery     Volume:  21     ISSN:  1708-0428     ISO Abbreviation:  Obes Surg     Publication Date:  2011 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-09-28     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9106714     Medline TA:  Obes Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1559-63     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98100, Messina, Italy, jose.c@tiscali.it.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Using ecological theory to evaluate the effectiveness of an indigenous community intervention: A stu...
Next Document:  Characterization of Biosorption Process of Acid Orange 7 on Waste Brewery's Yeast.