Document Detail

Incidental findings on cardiac computed tomography. Should we look?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19083887     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Although the intent of cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is to visualize the coronary, aortic, and cardiac structures, portions of noncardiac structures are visible on the scan. Because cardiac CT scanning is primarily obtained with a small field of view (to maximize coronary visualization with highest spatial resolution), some have argued that the scans should be secondarily reconstructed to further evaluate portions of the lung, breast, and bone. The suggested benefits of a routine radiologist overread of the extracardiac structures for incidental findings have not been scientifically validated and mostly come from anecdotal experiences. The same anecdotal arguments were used to support body scanning; the idea that complete visualization of all structures will lead to earlier cancer detection and therefore better outcomes. Every center that has ever offered body scanning can show a case of early detection of lung cancer, renal cancer, and colon cancer, thus proving their efficacy. However, body scanning has been uniformly discouraged, most strongly by the American College of Radiology and other professional organizations, because of the high number of false-positive findings, low ratio of true positives to false positives, high follow-up costs, and increased anxiety, all without proof of improvement in outcomes. Similar arguments were also made for routine chest x-rays in smokers, until studies showed that earlier detection of lung masses did not lead to improvement in outcomes. Preliminary studies are showing that enlarging the field for CTA scans to look for incidental findings will suffer the same fate as body scanning and chest x-rays, as another form of screening that cannot be medicolegally justified because of severely high false-positive rates and no improvement in outcomes. Until data are available to the opposite, we should use our good judgment and restraint and not perform large-field reconstructions for the explicit purpose of screening.
Matthew J Budoff; Ambarish Gopal
Related Documents :
23409687 - Funding uk cancer care: time for a level playing field?
17290367 - Development of 2dtca for the detection of irregular, transient bold activity.
23872207 - Phytoestrogens selective for the estrogen receptor beta exert anti-androgenic effects i...
18928537 - Positron emission tomography (pet) radiotracers in oncology--utility of 18f-fluoro-deox...
22382867 - Predictors of 25-hydroxyvitamin d and its association with risk factors for prostate ca...
8694547 - Usefulness of pyridinium crosslinks and ca 15-3 as markers in metastatic bone breast ca...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2007-05-18
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography     Volume:  1     ISSN:  1876-861X     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2007 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-12-16     Completed Date:  2009-03-16     Revised Date:  2009-03-19    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101308347     Medline TA:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  97-105     Citation Subset:  IM    
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA 90502, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Heart / radiography*
Incidental Findings*
Thoracic Diseases / radiography*
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*
Comment In:
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2008 Jan;2(1):64; author reply 64-5   [PMID:  19083922 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Feasibility of gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid enhanced multidetector computed tomog...
Next Document:  Clinical utility of delayed-contrast computed tomography for tissue characterization of cardiac thro...