| Incidence, follow-up, and outcomes of incidental abdominal aortic aneurysms. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20541348 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
BACKGROUND: Incidental abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are identified during imaging for other reasons. Incidental AAAs are important findings because they require monitoring and surgical treatment, when indicated, to prevent rupture. The prevalence of incidental AAAs and their management has not been extensively studied. METHODS: We electronically screened a 25% simple random sample of abdominal computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies conducted between 1996 and 2008 at one academic medical center. Screen-positive reports were manually reviewed to determine if they showed an incidental AAA. We reviewed the medical records of all in-patients to determine whether the incidental AAA was documented, a treatment plan was identified, and whether it was communicated to the patient's family physician through the discharge summary. We used evidence-based recommended schedules to determine the adequacy of AAA monitoring for each person. RESULTS: In 79,121 abdominal images, we identified 812 incidental AAAs (1.0% of all studies) or 364 incidental AAAs annually (95% confidence interval [CI], 349-379). Patients were elderly (mean age, 74 years), and AAAs were a mean diameter of 4.0 cm. For 174 inpatients, AAAs were noted in only 51 patients (29%) and only 25 (15%) were communicated to the family physician. Of 329 patients who were observed beyond their first recommended follow-up scan, only 51 (16%) were monitored appropriately throughout their entire follow-up; the median proportion of follow-up time with recommended monitoring was 56% (interquartile range, 32%-82%). Elective AAA repair was done in 98 patients (13%), the probability of which was significantly increased when AAA monitoring frequency was compliant with that recommended in practice guidelines. Six patients (0.8%) were admitted with aortic rupture, the probability of which was independent of AAA monitoring. CONCLUSION: Incidental AAAs are common and appear to be poorly monitored. Our data suggested that improved monitoring of incidental AAAs was independently associated with elective AAA repair. Population-based analyses are required to determine the influence that monitoring has on incidental AAA rupture and patient mortality. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Carl van Walraven; Jenna Wong; Kareem Morant; Alison Jennings; Prasad Jetty; Alan J Forster |
Related Documents
:
|
7474948 - Automatic vessel segmentation and quantification of the rat aortic ring assay of angiog... 7727188 - Aortic distensibility and stiffness index measured by magnetic resonance imaging in pat... 3340758 - Aortic dissection: sensitivity and specificity of mr imaging. 15769698 - The use of 3d epiaortic scanning to enhance evaluation of atherosclerotic plaque in the... 17168258 - The benefit of multislice ct in the emergency room management of polytraumatized patients. 501808 - The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of renal and perirenal abscesses. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article Date: 2010-06-11 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Journal of vascular surgery : official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Volume: 52 ISSN: 1097-6809 ISO Abbreviation: J. Vasc. Surg. Publication Date: 2010 Aug |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-07-30 Completed Date: 2010-08-31 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8407742 Medline TA: J Vasc Surg Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 282-9.e1-2 Citation Subset: IM |
Copyright Information:
|
Copyright (c) 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. |
Affiliation:
|
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. carlv@ohri.ca |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Academic Medical Centers Aged Aged, 80 and over Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / complications, diagnosis*, mortality, surgery Aortic Rupture / diagnosis, etiology*, mortality, surgery Aortography / methods Canada / epidemiology Communication Disease Progression Evidence-Based Medicine Female Guideline Adherence Humans Incidence Incidental Findings* Magnetic Resonance Angiography Male Medical Records Middle Aged Physician's Role Practice Guidelines as Topic Predictive Value of Tests Proportional Hazards Models Risk Assessment Risk Factors Surgical Procedures, Elective Time Factors Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment Outcome Vascular Surgical Procedures |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: A further meta-analysis of population-based screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Next Document: Below knee bare nitinol stent placement in high-risk patients with critical limb ischemia is still d...