Document Detail


In vitro testing of a newly developed arteriovenous double-outflow graft.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20591600     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
INTRODUCTION: The long-term prognosis of arteriovenous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) hemodialysis grafts remains poor, causing significant morbidity and costs. The high failure rate is due to a stenosis development of the graft-vein anastomosis, consisting of two pathophysiologically separate and characteristic lesions emerging from two main mechanisms: development of intimal hyperplasia in the vein and pseudointima in the graft. We developed a new venous anastomotic graft design that combines a flow diffuser and flow division, thereby creating a double-channel graft (Bi-Flow graft) and tested it in vitro. METHODS: In vitro experiments have been performed using silastic models of six different anastomotic configurations (straight end-to-side, cuffed Venaflo-type, large and small diffuser, and large and small Bi-Flow) inserted into a pulsatile-flow circuit. The silastic models were created using a computerized numerical control design approach, varying only the venous anastomoses. Velocity fields and shear stresses were obtained using particle image velocimetry, and volumetric flow rates through the models were measured using an ultrasound flowmeter. RESULTS: The hooded graft configurations showed significantly lower shear forces than did the end-to-side anastomosis. The shear stresses in the straight end-to-side graft were as high as arterial wall stresses. Large separation areas were present in the hooded grafts, except for the small Bi-Flow graft, which showed only isolated separation zones near the baffle used to divide the flow. The double-channel grafts exhibited a parabolic flow profile consisting of laminar flow in the double-outflow portion of the model's laminar flow pattern through the venous anastomosis. A marked flow separation was present in the large Bi-Flow model. Volumetric flow measurements revealed an average flow increase of 21% through the small Bi-Flow graft, which was attributed to the optimization of flow dynamics and pattern within the venous anastomosis of the double-channel graft. CONCLUSION: The new arteriovenous Bi-Flow graft design addresses two major problems responsible for the development of venous stenosis of prosthetic hemodialysis grafts in vitro. The new graft design should be further investigated in animal studies.
Authors:
Michael Heise; Petra Kirschner; Antonius Rabsch; Jürgen Zanow; Utz Settmacher; Christoph Heidenhain
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-06-29
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of vascular surgery : official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter     Volume:  52     ISSN:  1097-6809     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Vasc. Surg.     Publication Date:  2010 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-07-30     Completed Date:  2010-08-31     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8407742     Medline TA:  J Vasc Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  421-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright (c) 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany. michael.heise@med.uni-jena.de
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical / adverse effects,  instrumentation*
Blood Flow Velocity
Blood Pressure
Blood Vessel Prosthesis*
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects,  instrumentation*
Computer Simulation
Dimethylpolysiloxanes
Equipment Failure Analysis
Graft Occlusion, Vascular / etiology,  physiopathology,  prevention & control
Heart, Artificial
Hemorheology
Materials Testing
Models, Anatomic
Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted
Polytetrafluoroethylene*
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Pulsatile Flow
Renal Dialysis*
Stress, Mechanical
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Dimethylpolysiloxanes; 63148-62-9/baysilon; 9002-84-0/Polytetrafluoroethylene

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Recognition and Management of the Spectrum of Acute Laryngeal Trauma.
Next Document:  Long-term outcomes of diabetic patients undergoing endovascular infrainguinal interventions.