Document Detail

In vitro effects of 3 common arthroscopic instruments on articular cartilage.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16517315     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare chondroplasty performed with an ExoJet high-pressure fluid-driven burr (Mitek, Norwood, MA), a mechanical shaver, and a bipolar radiofrequency (RF) wand on articular cartilage-covered condyles taken from sheep cadavers that were induced to have an osteoarthritic-like condition, and corresponding healthy control tissue. TYPE OF STUDY: Experimental designed animal cadaveric, biochemical, and histologic study. METHODS: Sheep condyles were used as a source of articular cartilage. Femurs were extracted approximately 1 hour postmortem and a transverse section of the condyles was made. Half of the samples were treated to induce an osteoarthritic-like condition. The condyles were then subjected to chondroplasty performed with the ExoJet high-pressure fluid-driven burr, a mechanical shaver, and a bipolar RF wand under sterile saline solution by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon. Twenty cross-sections from each condyle were examined by confocal microscopy to measure smoothness and depth of tissue damage to the articular cartilage caused by each of the 3 instruments. RESULTS: The ExoJet high-pressure fluid-driven burr and the bipolar RF wand left a smoother surface on the articular cartilage compared with the mechanical shaver. Additionally, the ExoJet fluid-burr caused slightly less tissue damage to the cartilage than the bipolar RF wand, both of which were less damaging than the shaver. CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedists have multiple choices for surgical instruments used on cartilage. However, the effect on the integrity of the cartilage left remaining at the knee was previously unknown. Based on this study, a fluid-burr appears to leave the cartilage with a smaller zone of injury than does the RF wand or shaver. It also leaves the cartilage surface smoother than the shaver. During surgical procedures, minimizing cartilage breakdown and smooth remaining surfaces are desired because they minimize the vulnerable tissue to further destruction. A fluid burr leaves cartilage with less injury and with a smoother surface than do more traditional surgical instruments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This information should help surgeons in their selection of currently available surgical instruments and should aid engineers in the design of future instruments that function to modify articular cartilage.
Lora M Green; Jonathan S King; Brandon M Bianski; Marilyn M Pink; Christopher M Jobe
Related Documents :
21039435 - Strategies for prevention of scars: what can we learn from fetal skin?
7137575 - Studies on the histogenesis of the tunica mucosa of the stomach of the egyptian water b...
18179595 - Preferential localization of the endocytic internalization machinery to hyphal tips und...
16517315 - In vitro effects of 3 common arthroscopic instruments on articular cartilage.
22675945 - "embryo glue" does not seem to improve chances of subsequent pregnancy in refractory in...
23895885 - The incidence of induced abortion in malawi.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Evaluation Studies; In Vitro; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association     Volume:  22     ISSN:  1526-3231     ISO Abbreviation:  Arthroscopy     Publication Date:  2006 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-03-06     Completed Date:  2006-04-26     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8506498     Medline TA:  Arthroscopy     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  300-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Rheumatology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California 92354, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Arthroscopy / adverse effects,  methods*
Cartilage, Articular / injuries,  surgery*,  ultrastructure
Chondrocytes / ultrastructure
Microscopy, Confocal
Radio Waves
Surface Properties
Surgical Instruments*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Articular cartilage paste grafting to full-thickness articular cartilage knee joint lesions: a 2- to...
Next Document:  In vitro investigation of the effect of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and medial tib...