Document Detail


In vivo evaluation of the third generation biodegradable stent: a novel approach to avoiding the forgotten stent syndrome.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22982432     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: Ureteral stents are prone to irritation, encrustation and infection, and they require additional procedures for removal. Furthermore, indwelling polymer stents are often forgotten with devastating consequences to the patient. We describe the degradation time, and physiological and histological responses elicited by a novel biodegradable ureteral stent in a porcine model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 16 female Yorkshire pigs were used in the study. Ten biodegradable Uriprene™ stents and 6 biostable Polaris™ stents were cystoscopically inserted unilaterally in 2 groups of animals. Excretory urogram, and blood and urine tests were performed on different days until day 28. Biostable stents were removed on day 21. On day 28 all pigs underwent necropsy for microscopic and histological evaluation.
RESULTS: Nine of the 10 biodegradable stents (90%) degraded completely by 4 weeks, while 1 pig had 3 fragments smaller than 1.5 cm in the bladder. Excretory urogram showed equivalent drainage and significantly less hydronephrosis in biodegradable stented kidneys. Blood and urine parameters were similar in the 2 groups. A transient increase in serum creatinine on day 7 in 40% of the pigs with a degradable stent resolved by day 10. There were significantly fewer abnormal histological findings in the degradable stent group. We evaluated drainage characteristics in an unobstructed ureter and results may not be representative of what develops in obstructed ureters.
CONCLUSIONS: The third generation biodegradable stent is a safe, effective alternative to conventional polymer stents, resulting in equivalent drainage and less hydronephrosis.
Authors:
Ben H Chew; Ryan F Paterson; Kenneth W Clinkscales; Barry S Levine; Shalaby W Shalaby; Dirk Lange
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2012-10-08
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of urology     Volume:  189     ISSN:  1527-3792     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Urol.     Publication Date:  2013 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-01-14     Completed Date:  2013-07-08     Revised Date:  2013-09-05    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376374     Medline TA:  J Urol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  719-25     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
The Stone Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Absorbable Implants*
Animals
Female
Foreign Bodies / prevention & control*
Prosthesis Design
Stents*
Swine
Syndrome
Ureter*
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):814   [PMID:  23470223 ]
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):814-5   [PMID:  23692997 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Multi-System Neuroprosthetic Training Improves Bladder Function After Severe Spinal Cord Injury.
Next Document:  Connaught and Russian showed the highest direct antitumoral effects among different BCG substrains.