Document Detail

In utero pesticide exposure and leukemia in Brazilian children < 2 years of age.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23092909     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: An association between pesticide exposure and cancer has been suggested. Infant leukemia is a rare neoplasm and its association with maternal pesticide exposure has been poorly explored.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the association between pesticide exposure during pregnancy and leukemia in children < 2 years of age.
METHODS: A hospital-based case-control study was carried out in 13 Brazilian states during 1999-2007. Mothers of 252 cases and those of 423 controls were interviewed. Information on pesticide exposures 3 months before pregnancy, throughout pregnancy, and during breastfeeding was obtained. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for associations between pesticide exposures and leukemia.
RESULTS: Associations with ever use of pesticides during pregnancy were observed for acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) (aOR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.14, 3.86) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (aOR = 5.01; 95% CI: 1.97, 12.7) in children 0-11 months of age, and with ALL (aOR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.05, 5.23) at 12-23 months of age. According to reported maternal exposure to permethrin, higher risk estimates were verified for children 0-11 months of age (aOR = 2.47; 95% CI: 1.17, 5.25 for ALL; and aOR = 7.28; 95% CI: 2.60, 20.38 for AML). Maternal pesticide exposure related to agricultural activities showed an aOR of 5.25 (95% CI: 1.83, 15.08) for ALL, and an aOR of 7.56 (95% CI: 1.83, 31.23) for AML.
CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesis that pesticide exposure during pregnancy may be involved in the etiology of acute leukemia in children < 2 years of age.
Authors:
Jeniffer Dantas Ferreira; Arnaldo Cézar Couto; Maria S Pombo-de-Oliveira; Sergio Koifman;
Related Documents :
18412789 - Oligohydramnios and pulmonary hypoplasia: a case in which involvement of an angiotensin...
24508979 - Air pollution exposure and abnormal glucose tolerance during pregnancy: the project viv...
8561209 - Acute manic episodes in pregnancy.
22682699 - The development of cervical and vaginal adenosis as a result of diethylstilbestrol expo...
12954159 - Twenty-four-hour blood pressure monitoring in normoalbuminuric normotensive type 1 diab...
25150119 - Iron deficiency without anemia causes maternal hypothyroxinemia in pregnant rats.
8512999 - Effect of fenprostalene 14 days after fertirelin treatment on intervals from treatment ...
15533289 - Occurrence of peri-parturient rise in trichostrongylid nematode egg output in dorper ew...
17967589 - Effect of pulmonary stenosis on pregnancy outcomes--a case-control study.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2012-10-22
Journal Detail:
Title:  Environmental health perspectives     Volume:  121     ISSN:  1552-9924     ISO Abbreviation:  Environ. Health Perspect.     Publication Date:  2013 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-02-05     Completed Date:  2013-07-08     Revised Date:  2013-07-11    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0330411     Medline TA:  Environ Health Perspect     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  269-75     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Environment and Public Health Post-graduation Program, National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Case-Control Studies
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Leukemia / chemically induced*
Male
Maternal Exposure*
Pesticides / toxicity*
Pregnancy
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Pesticides
Investigator
Investigator/Affiliation:
Jozina Maria de Andrade Agareno / ; Flávia Nogueira Serafim Araújo / ; Núbia Mendonça / ; Cynthia Curvello Neves / ; Alejandro Aranciba / ; Renato Melarangno / ; Rosania Baseggio / ; Atalla Mnayarji / ; Reinaldo Del Belo / ; Jane Dobbin / ; Silvia Brandalise / ; Vitória Pinheiro / ; Lilian M Burlacchini de Carvalho / ; Tereza Cristina Cardoso / ; Joana de Gusmão / ; Jose Carlos Cordoba / ; Isis Q Magalhães / ; Virginia M Coser / ; Flávia Pimenta / ; Napoleão Laureano / ; João Pessoa / ; Mara A D Pianovsky / ; Terezinha J M Salles / ; Fernando Werneck / ; César Bariani / ; Eni Guimarães de Carvalho / ; Imaruí Costa / ; Maria Lucia Lee /
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Environ Health Perspect
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Environ. Health Perspect
Journal ID (publisher-id): EHP
ISSN: 0091-6765
ISSN: 1552-9924
Publisher: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright: 2013
open-access:
Received Day: 15 Month: 5 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 22 Month: 10 Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 22 Month: 10 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Month: 2 Year: 2013
Volume: 121 Issue: 2
First Page: 269 Last Page: 275
PubMed Id: 23092909
ID: 3569673
Publisher Id: ehp.1103942
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103942

In Utero Pesticide Exposure and Leukemia in Brazilian Children < 2 Years of Age
Jeniffer Dantas Ferreira1
Arnaldo Cézar Couto1
Maria S. Pombo-de-Oliveira2
Sergio Koifman1
the Brazilian Collaborative Study Group of Infant Acute Leukemia
1Environment and Public Health Post-graduation Program, National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2Pediatric Hematology–Oncology Program, Research Center, Instituto Nacional de Câncer/Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Correspondence: Address correspondence to S. Koifman, Environment and Public Health Post-graduation Program, National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rua Leopoldo Bulhões 1480, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21041-210, Brazil. Telephone: 55 21 2598-2634. E-mail: koifman@ensp.fiocruz.br

Pesticide exposure is a public health concern worldwide. In Brazil, a study conducted in two stages among small-scale fruit farmers revealed that 19% of them had reported at least one poisoning episode (4% in the year before interview). Even at this stage, 11% of all episodes were probable cases of acute poisoning according to World Health Organization criteria (Faria et al. 2009). Moreover, pesticide use also has been associated with chronic diseases such as cancer, including childhood leukemia, at 0–14 years of age (Bassil et al. 2007; Infante-Rivard and Weichenthal 2007; Turner et al. 2010; Zahm and Ward 1998).

Infant leukemias are rare acute leukemias diagnosed within the first 12 months of age, although some researchers include cases up to 18 months of age (Alexander et al. 2001; Pombo-de-Oliveira and Koifman 2006). DNA alterations during the periconceptional period or pregnancy, which may be caused by chemical substances and other environmental exposures, are potential risk factors for infant leukemias (Buffler et al. 2005; Lafiura et al. 2007). Previous studies have reported associations between childhood leukemia and maternal exposure to pesticides (Ma et al. 2002; Meinert et al. 2000; Menegaux et al. 2006; Monge et al. 2007; Rudant et al. 2007).

However, few studies of pesticides and leukemia in very young children have been published. Additionally, most studies of association between childhood leukemias and pesticides have focused on parents’ occupational exposures (Colt and Blair 1998; Monge et al. 2005; Perez-Saldivar et al. 2008; Rudant et al. 2007; Wigle et al. 2009), and a few have considered the use of household pesticides during the prenatal period (Lafiura et al. 2007; Meinert et al. 2000; Monge et al. 2007; Zahm and Ward 1998).

A case–control study of risk factors for leukemia in children < 2 years of age was conducted in Brazil, and an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 2.18 (95% CI: 1.53, 2.13) was reported in association with maternal exposure to pesticides (Pombo-de-Oliveira and Koifman 2006). In the present investigation, we aimed to extend these analyses of maternal pesticide exposure and leukemia in the offspring.


Methods

Study population. This investigation is part of a multicenter study, the Multi-institutional Study of Infant Leukemia: Contribution of Immunomolecular Markers in Distinguishing Different Etiopathogenic Factors, which focuses on the investigation of biomarkers of leukemia diagnosed in children < 2 years of age in Brazil. Participants (n = 675) were recruited from 13 states in all geographic areas in the country but the Amazon, including cities in the Southern Region, the Southeast, the Northeast, and the Middle West.

Study design. This is a hospital-based multicenter case–control study in which controls were frequency matched with leukemia cases according to age (0–23 months) and enrolled from the same geographic areas where cases were diagnosed.

Data were obtained by in-person interviews carried out from 1999 through 2007 with mothers of newly diagnosed patients. These patients were recruited from the Brazilian National Health System centers that provide free oncologic care for pediatric patients and from general hospitals.

Cases (n = 252) were defined as children < 24 months of age with a conclusive diagnosis of acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) (n = 193) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (n = 59) confirmed by morphology, immunophenotype, and standard cytogenetic-molecular methods.

Controls (n = 423) were selected from among children < 24 months of age with nonmalignant diseases who were patients at the Brazilian National Health System centers where the cases were recruited or patients of general hospitals in the same cities. The hospitals from which controls were recruited had the same catchment areas of those of cases. Controls included children with infectious and parasitic diseases (n = 124, 29.4%), nonmalignant hematological diseases (n = 83, 19.6%), asthma and bronchitis (n = 43, 10.2%), hemangioma (n = 40, 9.4%), severe diarrhea (n = 39, 9.2%), cardiovascular diseases (n = 25, 5.8%), and other nonmalignant conditions (n = 69, 16.4%).

Children with congenital syndromes, myelodisplasia, adoptive parents, or unknown biological mothers were not eligible to be enrolled, and controls with a cancer diagnosis were excluded. Participation of invited cases and controls in the study was, respectively, 96% and 95% (Pombo-de-Oliveira and Koifman 2006).

Data collection. The study was specifically designed to collect information on several environmental exposures potentially associated with leukemogenesis. Data were collected by in-person interviews with case and control mothers at the hospital. A standardized questionnaire used for all participants contained information on environmental exposures during pregnancy, including use of pesticides. Interviewers were health staff members without special knowledge of pesticide toxicology, and were instructed to register all answers provided by the interviewed mothers. Pesticide exposure information was further analyzed and classified according to toxicological characteristics. Child skin color was indicated by mothers and further dichotomized as white and nonwhite. At each center, the same interviewers were responsible for both cases and controls. Participating mothers provided written informed consent for themselves and their children.

Pesticide exposure was evaluated based on the mother’s report of any contact with pesticides (at least once) during the 3 months before pregnancy (periconceptual period), throughout each pregnancy trimester, or during the 3 months after birth (breastfeeding). They were requested to inform about any contact with pesticides at home or in the workplace during each of these pregnancy times windows of exposure. Brand names of commercial products reported by the mothers were used to determine chemical content, and associations with pesticides were explored according to the form of use—unintentional, domestic (household), or agricultural (maternal occupational exposure, or living in an agricultural area with pesticides use)—and duration and regularity of contact (no use, once a week or less, more than once a week).

Exposures to products that included pesticides from multiple chemical classes (for instance, pyrethroids, organophosphates, and carbamates), or maternal exposure to both insecticides and herbicides were also assessed, and categorized as mixed exposures whenever reported.

Ethics. This investigation was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (No. 005/06) and by the Research Ethics Committee of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), No. 32/10. Participating mothers provided written informed consent for themselves and their children.

Statistical analysis. We performed unconditional logistic regression to estimate associations between pesticide exposures and early leukemias ORs and their 95% CIs after adjustment for birth weight (< 4,000 g, ≥ 4,000 g), maternal age at birth (< 35 years, ≥ 35 years), maternal schooling (≤ 8 years, > 8 years), oral contraceptive intake during pregnancy (no use, use during pregnancy), and child’s skin color (white or nonwhite).

We performed sensitivity analysis using different control subsets, specifically a) after excluding controls with gastro-intestinal infections, parasitic diseases, dehydration, malnutrition or diarrhea; b) controls with respiratory illnesses, including tuberculosis, pneumonia, asthma, bronchitis, and bronchiolitis. Considering that both subsets are more prevalent among low-income strata, such procedures aimed to evaluate possible confounding resulting from these controls inclusion. In addition, we estimated stratum-specific ORs according to child’s skin color.


Results

Geographical distribution of participants is presented in Supplemental Material, Table S1 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103942), showing a higher number of children from São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Sociodemographic characteristics differed between cases and controls. Specifically, cases were more likely than controls to be white, to have mothers who were older at child’s birth and had > 8 years of education, and to have higher family income (Table 1). Complete information on model covariates was available for 85% of cases and 90% of controls. Agricultural pesticide exposures were reported by 22 (3.3%) mothers, including 7 (1.0%) who were agricultural workers.

Pesticide use at any time during the pregnancy was reported by 60.7% of AML case mothers, 36.4% of ALL case mothers, and 21.3% of control mothers of children who were 0–11 months of age (Table 2). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were 2.10 (95% CI: 1.14, 3.86) for ALL and 5.01 (95% CI: 1.97, 12.7) for AML.

For children diagnosed or enrolled at 12–23 months of age, 48.4%, 47.6%, and 31.4% of AML, ALL, and controls were exposed to pesticides during pregnancy, respectively. Adjusted ORs were 1.88 (95% CI: 1.05, 5.23) for ALL and 1.98 (95% CI: 0.83, 4.74) for AML.

Among children diagnosed or enrolled at 0–11 months of age, information on periconceptual pesticide exposure was available for 99% of controls, 92% of ALL cases, and 82% of AML cases. At 12–23 months of age, information was available for, respectively, 95%, 63%, and 71% (Table 2). ALL and AML were significantly associated with periconceptual exposures among children 0–11 months of age (aOR 2.40; 95% CI: 1.20, 4.81; and aOR 3.81; 95% CI: 1.34, 10.8, respectively). AML was significantly associated with periconceptual exposure in children 12–23 months of age (aOR 2.48; 95% CI: 1.20, 5.11).

The odds of AML were increased with exposure during all time periods among children 0–11 months of age, with significant associations for pesticide exposure in the third trimester (aOR 3.70; 95% CI: 1.32, 10.4) and during breastfeeding (aOR 7.04; 95% CI: 2.47, 20.1). At 12–23 months of age, the odds were, respectively, aOR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.35, 2.69 and aOR 1.20; 95% CI: 0.43, 3.34.

Sensitivity analysis according to the variables skin color [white/nonwhite; see Supplemental Material, Table S2 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103942], diarrhea, parasitic diseases, dehydration, or malnutrition (see Supplemental Material, Table S3), and respiratory diseases (see Supplemental Material, Table S4) seems to support the presented results on the association between pesticide exposure and leukemia among very young children (Table 2).

Adjusted ORs for any exposure to pyrethroid pesticides during pregnancy were 1.80 (95% CI: 1.11, 2.90) for ALL and 3.39 (95% CI: 1.72, 16.78) for AML (Table 3). Adjusted ORs for use of pesticide formulations that included solvents were 1.79 (95% CI: 1.10, 2.92) for ALL and 3.45 (95% CI: 1.76, 6.74) for AML (data not shown).

The reported use of pesticide brands containing organophosphates was uncommon (1.7% of control, 2.6% of AML, and 6.8% of ALL mothers). The magnitude of association between such products and AML in very young children was shown as aOR = 5.50 (95% CI: 1.44, 21.03) (Table 3).

Adjusted ORs for pesticide exposure at home were 3.12 (95% CI: 1.61, 6.05) for AML, and 1.88 (95% CI: 1.20, 2.95) for ALL (Table 3). Adjusted ORs for agricultural pesticide exposures were indeed higher: aOR = 5.25; 95% CI: 1.83, 15.08 for ALL, and aOR = 7.56; 95% CI: 1.83, 31.23 for AML.

Compared with no reported pesticide exposure, an aOR of 2.88 (95% CI: 1.35, 6.17) for AML was estimated for the children of women reporting exposure once a week or less, and aOR of 2.94 (95% CI: 1.17, 7.38) for exposure more than once a week (Table 3). For ALL, corresponding aORs were 2.19 (95% CI: 1.29, 3.69) and 2.06 (95% CI: 1.10, 3.86). Adjusted ORs for exposure to commercial products that included multiple pesticides were 5.22 (95% CI: 1.44, 19.0) for ALL, and 6.51 (95% CI: 1.25, 34.0) for AML.

A comprehensive analysis of all individual chemical components included in the reported brands revealed statistically significant associations between leukemia in very young children and maternal exposure to seven pyrethroids and unspecified solvents (Table 4). Estimates of associations with exposure to individual pyrethroids during pregnancy were imprecise due to small numbers of reported exposures. Permethrin, imiprothrin, and esbiothrin exposures during pregnancy were positively associated either with ALL (aOR = 2.47; 95% CI: 1.17, 5.25; aOR = 2.61; 95% CI: 1.06, 6.93; aOR 3.03; 95% CI: 1.13, 8.09, respectively) or AML (aOR = 7.28; 95% CI: 2.60, 20.38; aOR = 3.41; 95% CI: 0.98, 11.90; aOR = 3.19; 95% CI: 0.77, 13.19) at 0–11 months of age.

Among children 11–23 months of age, esbiothrin exposures during pregnancy were positively associated with AML (aOR = 3.71; 95% CI: 1.18, 11.62) (Table 4). Maternal exposure to tetramethrin and D-allethrin was positively associated with AML in children 0–11 months of age (aOR = 6.19; 95% CI: 2.07, 18.56 for both), whereas D-phenothrin was positively associated with AML in children 11–23 months of age (aOR = 8.43; 95% CI: 1.59, 44.75) (Table 4).


Discussion

Pesticides are complex mixtures that include components such as solvents, humidifying agents, emulsifiers, and additives in addition to active ingredients (Bolognesi 2003; Feron et al. 1998). Furthermore, the seasonal use of distinct formulas for specific purposes makes it difficult to present a qualitative evaluation of exposure to individual substances.

Our findings suggest that children whose mothers were exposed to pesticides 3 months before conception were at least twice as likely to be diagnosed with ALL in the first year of life compared with those whose mothers did not report such exposure. Adjusted ORs for AML in the first year of life ranged from 2.75 (95% CI: 0.96, 7.92) for any pesticide exposure in the first trimester of pregnancy, to 7.04 (95% CI: 2.47, 20.10) for exposure during breastfeeding.

Studies conducted in other countries have also reported positive associations between pesticide exposure and hematopoietic neoplasms in children, especially leukemias and lymphomas (Ma et al. 2002; Meinert at al. 2000; Menegaux et al. 2006; Rudant et al. 2007; Zahm and Ward 1998). A systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies of the association between residential exposure to pesticides during selected time windows (preconception, pregnancy, and childhood) and childhood leukemia carried out during 1950–2009 (Turner et al. 2010) reported associations with pregnancy exposure to unspecified pesticides (OR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.13, 2.11), insecticides (OR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.80, 2.32), and herbicides (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.16). Another meta-analysis of 31 studies of parental occupational exposure to pesticides and childhood leukemia (Wigle et al. 2009) reported associations with occupational exposure to insecticides (OR = 2.72; 95% CI: 1.47, 5.04) and herbicides (OR = 3.62; 95% CI: 1.28, 10.3) during pregnancy.

A French study also examined the association between pesticide exposure and infant leukemia (Rudant et al. 2007). According to use of any pesticide, the observed risk estimates (ORs) were 2.3 (95% CI: 1.9, 2.8) for ALL and 2.2 (95% CI: 1.4, 3.3) for AML. These authors also suggested that a domestic use of pesticides may play a role in the etiology of leukemia, and that prenatal exposure may be a window of fetal vulnerability.

Pesticide exposure during childhood may occur in many ways, either through contamination of their parents’ work clothes or through household residues in water, air, soil, and food (Araújo et al. 2000; Rudant et al. 2007). However, the short latency period for leukemias diagnosed during the first year of life suggests that intrauterine exposures may play a paramount role in this process.

In the Agricultural Health Study—a large prospective cohort study of approximately 49,000 pesticide applicators in the United States—an association between permethrin exposure and multiple myeloma was observed (Rusiecki et al. 2009). Compared with applicators who reported never using permethrin, the risk ratio for multiple myeloma among applicators in the highest tertile of lifetime exposure was 5.72 (95% CI: 2.76, 11.87). Another study of this cohort (Flower et al. 2004) reported a positive association between having a parent who applied pesticides and lymphomas diagnosed among children [age-standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 2.18 (95% CI: 1.13, 4.19)], but not leukemias in children (SIR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.95).

Moreover, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Canadian Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) have referred the occurrence of carcinogenicity following permethrin exposure in animal toxicity studies (Weichental et al. 2010). An insecticide containing imiprothrin and deltamethrin that is widely used in Egypt has been evaluated for immunotoxic effects in rats (Emara and Draz 2007). The authors observed that animals exposed to both chemicals, compared with unexposed animals, had altered levels of splenic CD4+ and CD8 cells and CD4+ and CD8+ cells, and concluded that a repeated noncontinous inhalation of imiothropin and deltamethrin causes several immunotoxic effects in other distal sites to the lungs. Other pyrethroids, such as allethrin, cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, and tetramethrin, have also been suggested to be involved in canine mammary carcinogenesis (Andrade et al. 2010).

This research has some limitations. The hospital-based case–control study design may introduce selection bias depending on the chosen comparison groups (Rudant et al. 2010; Wacholder et al. 1992). We recruited controls with a variety of indications for hospitalization and enrolled controls from general hospitals in the same cities, though not necessarily the same hospitals, in which the cases were diagnosed. On the other hand, the similar origin of cases and controls could theoretically induce the introduction of overmatching in relation to agriculture pesticide exposure. The reports on pesticide exposure in the agricultural set (15 ALL, 4 AML, and 7 controls, Table 3) accounted for 3.3% of all participants. Therefore, we think it improbable that overmatching on agricultural pesticide exposure has distorted the conclusions of this investigation.

Pesticide exposures during the examined time windows were highly correlated, with statistically significant high Pearson’s correlation coefficients, r > 0.77. Hence, associations with exposures during specific time of windows could not be accurately determined. Additionally, length of exposure was not evaluated in this study, so associations according to maternal cumulative exposure to pesticides could not be estimated. Finally, sample size was limited, mainly to AML, thus resulting in imprecise estimates of association.

On the other hand, the study has some strengths, being relatively large given that the outcomes are rare. In addition, most previous studies have been based on populations from a limited number of countries, so our study contributes for exploring the role of pesticide exposure during pregnancy and leukemias in children < 2 years of age. Moreover, information on the type of pesticide exposure, time periods of exposure, exposures to individual chemicals (mainly pyrethroids), and data on subgroups of leukemias (ALL, AML), may enhance understanding of the role of maternal exposure to pesticides during pregnancy and leukemia in young children.


Conclusions

Future research will benefit from exploring the genetic and molecular mechanisms that characterize individual susceptibility to pesticide exposures in the development of leukemia in young children. However, the consistency of our findings with those of similar studies performed in different populations supports recommendations for women of reproductive age to minimize their exposure to pesticides before and during pregnancy and breastfeeding.


Supplemental Material (197 KB) PDF

Notes

This investigation was supported by the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq), Instituto Nacional de Câncer-Fundação Ary Frauzino, and the Swiss Bridge Foundation. J.D.F. and A.C.C. have been supported by Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health of Brazil fellowships. M.S.P.O. and S.K. have been supported by CNPq research grants 309091/2007-1 and 577598/2008-2, respectively. The project was funded by INCT-Controle do Cancer; CNPq 573806/2008-0, and the State of Rio de Janeiro Research Foundation (FAPERJ) grant E026/2008.

The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

References
Alexander FE,Patheal SL,Biondi A,Brandalise S,Cabrera ME,Chan LC,et al. Year: 2001Transplacental chemical exposure and risk of infant leukemia with MILL gene fusion.Cancer Res612542254611289128
Andrade FH,Figueiroa FC,Bersano PR,Bissacot DZ,Rocha NS. Year: 2010Malignant mammary tumor in female dogs: environmental contaminants.Diagn Pathol545; doi: [Online 30 June 2010]. 10.1186/1746-1596-5-4520587072
Araújo AC,Nogueira DP,Augusto LG. Year: 2000Pesticide impact on health: a study of tomato cultivation [in Portuguese]. Rev de Saúde Pública34309313
Bassil KL,Vakil C,Sanborn N,Cole DC,Kaur JS,Kerr KJ. Year: 2007Cancer health effects of pesticides: systematic review.Can Fam Physician531704171117934034
Bolognesi C.. Year: 2003Genotoxicity of pesticides: a review of humam biomonitoring studies.Mutat Res54325127212787816
Buffler PA,Kwan ML,Reynolds P,Urayama KY. Year: 2005Environmental and genetic risk factors for childhood leukemia: appraising the evidence.Cancer Invest23607515779869
Colt JS,Blair A. Year: 1998Parental exposures and risk of childhood cancer.Environ Health Perspect1069099259646055
Emara AM,Draz EI. Year: 2007Immunotoxicological study of one of the most common over-the-counter pyrethroid insecticide products in Egypt.Inhal Toxicol19997100917917914
Faria NMX,Rosa JAR,Facchini LA. Year: 2009 [Poisoning by pesticides among family fruit farmers, Bento Gonçalves, Southern Brazil]. Rev. Saúde Pública43233534419225687
Feron VJ,Cassee FR,Groten JP. Year: 1998Toxicology of chemicals mixtures: international perspective.Environ Health Perspect106suppl 6128112899860882
Flower KB,Hoppin JA,Lynch CF,Blair A,Knott C,Shore DL,Sandler DP. Year: 2004Cancer risk and parental pesticide application in children of Agricultural Health Study participants.Environ Health Perspect11263163515064173
Infante-Rivard C,Weichenthal S.. Year: 2007Pesticides and childhood cancer: an update of Zahm and Ward’s 1998 review.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev10819918074305
Lafiura KM,Bielawski DM,Posecion NC Jr,Ostrea E M Jr,Matherly LH,Taub JW,et al. Year: 2007Association between prenatal pesticide exposures and the generation of leukemia-associated t(8;21).Pediatr Blood Cancer4962462817610268
Ma X,Buffler PA,Gunier RB,Dahl G,Smith MT,Renier K,et al. Year: 2002Critical windows of exposure to household pesticides and risk of acute leukemia.Environ Health Perspect11095596012204832
Meinert R,Schuz J,Kaletsch U,Kaatsch Michaelis J.. Year: 2000Leukemia and non-Hodgking’s lymphoma in childhood and exposure to pesticides: results of a register-based case-control Study in Germany.Am J Epidemiol15163964610752791
Menegaux F,Baruchel A,Bertrand Y,Lescoeur B,Leveger G,Nelken B,et al. Year: 2006Household exposure to pesticides and risk of childhood acute leukaemia.Occup Environ Med6313113416421392
Monge P,Wesseling C,Guardado J,Lundberg I,Ahlbom A,Cantor KP,et al. Year: 2007Parental occupational exposure to pesticides and the risk of childhood leukemia in Costa Rica.Scand J Work Environ Health3329330317717622
Monge P,Partanen T,Wesseling C,Bravo V,Ruepert C,Burstyn I.. Year: 2005Assessment of pesticides exposure in the agricultural population of Costa Rica.Ann Occup Hyg4937538415650018
Perez-Saldivar ML,Ortega-Alvarez MC,Fajardo-Gutierrez A,Bernaldez-Rios R,Del Campo-Martinez ML,Medina-Sanson A,et al. Year: 2008Father’s occupational exposure to carcinogenic agents and childhood acute leukemia: a new method to assess exposure (a case-control study).BMC Cancer87; doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-7 [Online 14 January 2008]. 18194546
Pombo-de-Oliveira MS,Koifman S,Brazilian Collaborative Study Group of Infant LeukemiaYear: 2006Infant acute leukemia and maternal exposures during pregnancy.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev152336234117164354
Rudant J,Menegaux F,Leverger G. , Year: 2007Household exposure to pesticides and risk of childhood hematopoietic malignancies: the SCALE study (SFCE).Environ Health Perspect1151787179318087601
Rudant J,Clavel J,Infant-Rivard C.. Year: 2010Selection bias in case-control studies in household exposure to pesticides and childhood acute leukemia.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol2029930920010976
Rusiecki JA,Patel R,Koutros S,Beane-Freeman L,Landgren O,Bonner MR,et al. Year: 2009Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to permethrin in the Agricultural Health Study.Environ Health Perspect11758158619440497
Turner MC,Wigle DT,Krewski D. Year: 2010Residential pesticides and childhood leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Environ Health Perspect118334120056585
Wacholder S,McLaughlin JK,Silverman DT,Mandel JS. Year: 1992Selection of controls in case-control studies. I. Principles.Am J Epidemiol135101910281595688
Weichenthal S,Moase C,Chan P.. Year: 2010A review of pesticide exposure and cancer incidence in the Agricultural Health Study cohort.Environ Health Perspect1181117112520444670
Wigle DT,Turner MC,Krewski D. Year: 2009A systematic review and meta-analysis of childhood leukemia and parental occupational pesticide exposure.Environ Health Perspect1171505151320019898
Zahm SH,Ward MH. Year: 1998Pesticides and childhood cancer.Environ Health Perspect1068939089646054

Tables
[TableWrap ID: t1] Table 1 

Distribution [n (%)] of selected sociodemographic variables; leukemia cases and controls, children < 2 years of age, Brazil, 1999–2007.


Characteristic Cases (n = 252) Controls (n = 423) p-Value
Sex
Male 130 (51.6) 226 (53.4) 0.643
Female 122 (48.4) 197 (46.6)
Missing 0 0
Birth weight
< 4,000 g 234 (92.9) 393 (93.0) 0.470
≥ 4,000 g 16 (6.3) 21 (5.0)
Missing 2 (0.8) 9 (2.0)
Child’s skin color
White 170 (67.5) 153 (36.2) < 0.001
Nonwhite 77 (30.5) 256 (60.5)
Missing 5 (2.0) 14 (3.3)
Place of birth
Northeast 52 (20.6) 101 (24.1) 0.552
Midwest 18 (7.1) 31 (7.3)
Southeast 155 (61.5) 237 (56.0)
South 27 (10.7) 54 (12.6)
Missing 0 0
Maternal age (years)a
< 18 8 (3.2) 60 (14.1) < 0.001
18–24 91 (36.1) 182 (42.9)
25–34 117 (46.4) 145 (34.2)
> 35 36 (14.3) 36 (8.8)
Missing 0 0
Maternal education (years)
≤ 8 81 (32.1) 206 (48.6) < 0.001
> 8 146 (57.9) 209 (49.4)
Missing 25 (10.0) 8 (2.0)
Family income (Brazilian real)
≤ 350 74 (29.4) 148 (35.0) < 0.001
351–1,750 102 (40.5) 218 (51.5)
1,751–3,500 27 (10.7) 11 (2.6)
≥ 3,500 12 (5.0) 3 (0.7)
Missing 37 (14.4) 43 (10.2)
Oral contraceptive use
No 223 (88.5) 404 (95.5) < 0.001
Yes 29 (11.5) 19 (4.5)
Missing 0 0
aMaternal age at birth.

[TableWrap ID: t2] Table 2 

Maternal exposure to pesticides by time window of exposure; leukemia cases and controls, children < 2 years of age, Brazil, 1999–2007.


Pesticide exposure Controls (n = 423) [n (%)] ALL (n = 193) [n (%)] AML (n = 59) [n (%)] ALL AML
Crude OR (95% CI) aORa (95% CI) Crude OR (95% CI) aORa (95% CI)
Pesticide use
0–11 months
No 200 (78.7) 56 (63.6) 11 (39.3) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 54 (21.3) 32 (36.4) 17 (60.7) 2.12 (1.25–3.59) 2.10 (1.14–3.86) 5.72 (2.53–12.94) 5.01 (1.97–12.75)
Missing 0 0 0
12–23 months
No 116 (68.6) 55 (52.4) 16 (51.6) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 53 (31.4) 50 (47.6) 15 (48.4) 1.99 (1.20–3.29) 1.88 (1.05–5.23) 2.05 (0.95–4.46) 1.98 (0.83–4.74)
Missing 0 0 0
Periconceptualb
0–11 months
No 220 (86.6) 63 (71.6) 15 (53.6) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 32 (12.6) 18 (20.4) 8 (28.6) 1.96 (1.03–3.73) 2.40 (1.20–4.81) 3.67 (1.44–9.34) 3.81 (1.34–10.84)
Missing 2 (0.8) 7 (8.0) 5 (17.8)
12–23 months
No 125 (74.0) 64 (61.0) 15 (48.4) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 36 (21.3) 32 (30.5) 7 (22.6) 1.62 (0.61–4.28) 1.34 (0.47–3.85) 1.94 (1.04–3.61) 2.48 (1.20–5.11)
Missing 8 (4.7) 9 (8.5) 9 (29.0)
1st Trimester
0–11 months
No 219 (86.2) 63 (71.6) 16 (57.2) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 32 (12.6) 18 (20.4) 7 (25.0) 1.96 (1.03–3.72) 1.86 (0.94–3.72) 2.99 (1.14–7.84) 2.75 (0.96–7.92)
Missing 3 (1.2) 7 (8.0) 5 (17.8)
12–23 months
No 127 (75.1) 65 (61.9) 20 (64.5) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 35 (25.0) 31 (29.5) 8 (25.8) 1.73 (0.98–3.05) 1.87 (0.99–3.56) 1.45 (0.59–3.57) 1.28 (0.47–3.53)
Missing 7 (4.1) 9 (8.5) 3 (9.7)
2nd Trimester
0–11 months
No 219 (86.2) 64 (72.7) 16 (57.2) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 32 (12.6) 17 (19.3) 7 (25.0) 1.70 (0.89–3.25) 1.75 (0.87–3.55) 2.80 (1.08–7.32) 2.27 (0.79–6.47)
Missing 3 (1.2) 7 (8.0) 5 (17.8)
12–23 months
No 129 (76.2) 68 (64.8) 20 (64.5) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 33 (19.5) 28 (26.7) 8 (25.8) 1.61 (0.90–2.88) 1.76 (0.91–3.39) 1.56 (0.63–3.86) 1.48 (0.54–4.04)
Missing 7 (4.1) 9 (8.5) 3 (9.7)
3rd Trimester
0–11 months
No 218 (85.8) 65 (73.8) 15 (53.6) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 33 (13.0) 16 (18.2) 8 (28.6) 1.63 (0.84–3.14) 1.88 (0.93–3.79) 3.52 (1.39–8.96) 3.70 (1.32–10.38)
Missing 3 (1.2) 7 (8.0) 5 (17.8)
12–23 months
No 123 (72.8) 68 (64.8) 20 (64.5) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 39 (23.1) 28 (26.7) 8 (25.8) 1.30 (0.74–2.29) 1.26 (0.66–2.40) 1.26 (0.52–3.09) 0.97 (0.35–2.69)
Missing 7 (4.1) 9 (8.5) 3 (9.7)
Breastfeedingc
0–11 months
No 229 (90.2) 69 (78.4) 14 (50.0) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 22 (8.6) 12 (13.6) 9 (32.2) 1.81 (0.85–3.84) 2.05 (0.92–4.58) 6.69 (2.60–17.21) 7.04 (2.47–20.10)
Missing 3 (1.2) 7 (8.0) 5 (17.8)
12–23 months
No 128 (75.7) 68 (64.8) 21 (67.7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 33 (19.6) 28 (26.7) 7 (22.6) 1.60 (0.89–2.86) 1.53 (0.80–2.95) 1.29 (0.51–3.30) 1.20 (0.43–3.34)
Missing 8 (4.7) 9 (8.5) 3 (9.7)
aaORs by use of oral contraceptives during pregnancy, maternal age and education, child’s birth weight and skin color. bThree months before pregnancy. cThree months after delivery.

[TableWrap ID: t3] Table 3 

Maternal use of pesticides according to chemical class, frequency and type of use during pregnancy; leukemia cases and controls, children < 2 years of age, Brazil, 1999–2007.


Pesticide use during pregnancy Controls (n = 423) [n (%)] ALL (n = 193) [n (%)] AML (n = 59) [n (%)] ALL vs. controls Crude OR (95% CI) ALL vs. controls aOR (95% CI)a AML vs. controls Crude OR (95% CI) AML vs. controls aORa (95% CI)
Chemical group
None used 316 (74.7) 111 (57.5) 27 (45.7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pyrethroid 89 (21.0) 63 (32.6) 25 (42.4) 2.02 (1.34–3.02) 1.80 (1.11–2.90) 3.29 (1.73–6.20) 3.39 (1.72–16.78)
Organophosphates 7 (1.7) 5 (2.6) 4 (6.8) 2.03 (0.63–6.54) 1.06 (0.26–4.32) 6.69 (1.84–24.29) 5.50 (1.44–21.03)
Other pesticidesb 17 (2.6) 14 (7.3) 3 (5.1) 2.66 (1.30–5.43) 2.96 (1.28–6.84) 2.66 (0.84–8.44) 1.77 (0.35–8.80)
Type of use
None used 316 (74.7) 111 (57.5) 27 (48.2) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Household 89 (21.0) 62 (32.1) 25 (44.6) 1.98 (1.34–2.93) 1.88 (1.20–2.95) 3.29 (1.82–5.95) 3.12 (1.61–6.05)
Agriculture 7 (1.7) 15 (7.8) 4 (7.1) 6.10 (2.42–15.35) 5.25 (1.83–15.08) 6.69 (1.84–24.29) 7.56 (1.83–31.23)
Frequency
None 315 (79.3) 111 (64.9) 27 (55.1) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Up to once/week 45 (11.3) 35 (20.5) 13 (26.5) 2.23 (1.38–3.59) 2.19 (1.29–3.69) 3.20 (1.58–6.48) 2.88 (1.35–6.17)
> Once/week 37 (8.7) 25 (13.0) 9 (15.3) 1.82 (1.02–3.25) 2.06 (1.10–3.86) 2.58 (1.09–6.09) 2.94 (1.17–7.38)
Brands with mixed chemicalsc
No 414 (97.9) 183 (94.8) 55 (93.2) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 9 (2.1) 10 (5.2) 4 (6.8) 2.51 (1.01–6.29) 5.22 (1.44–18.97) 3.35 (0.73–12.35) 6.51 (1.25–33.99)
Distinct pest classes
No 420 (99.3) 186 (96.4) 58 (98.3) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 3 (0.7) 7 (3.6) 1 (1.7) 5.27 (1.35–20.6) 18.34 (2.01–167.38) 3.35 (1.00–11.23) 8.03 (0.37–174.68)
aaORs by use of oral contraceptives during pregnancy, maternal age and education, child’s birth weight and skin color. bOrganochlorines, cumarines, and others. cExposure to more than one chemical in the same product or distinct products.

[TableWrap ID: t4] Table 4 

Maternal exposure to chemical components of specific pesticides during pregnancy; leukemia cases and controls, children < 2 years of age, Brazil, 1999–2007.


Chemical compound Controls (n = 423) [n (%)] ALL (n = 193) [n (%)] AML (n = 59) [n (%)] ALL AML
Crude OR (95% CI) aORa (95% CI) Crude OR (95% CI) aORa (95% CI)
Prallethrin
0–11 months
No 234 (55.3) 78 (40.4) 23 (43.4) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 3 (0.7) 1 (0.5) 2 (3.8) 1.00 (0.10–9.75) 1.52 (0.15–15.32) 6.78 (1.08–42.70) 8.06 (1.17–55.65)
12–23 months
No 155 (36.6) 94 (48.7) 29 (54.7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 3 (0.7) 3 (1.5) 0 (0.0) 1.65 (0.33–8.34) 1.16 (0.15–9.12)
Permethrin
0–11 months
No 211 (49.9) 63 (32.6) 15 (28.3) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 26 (6.1) 16 (8.3) 10 (18.9) 2.06 (1.04–4.08) 2.47 (1.17–5.25) 5.41 (2.20–13.28) 7.28 (2.60–20.38)
12–23 months
No 128 (30.3) 75 (38.8) 23 (43.4) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 30 (7.1) 22 (11.4) 6 (11.3) 1.25 (0.67–2.33) 1.47 (0.71–3.08) 1.11 (0.42–2.97) 1.32 (0.43–4.02)
Imiprothrin
0–11 months
No 223 (52.7) 67 (34.7) 20 (37.7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 14 (3.3) 12 (6.2) 5 (9.4) 2.85 (1.26–6.46) 2.61 (1.06–6.93) 3.98 (1.30–12.91) 3.41 (0.98–11.90)
12–23 months
No 140 (33.1) 81 (42.0) 22 (41.5) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 18 (4.3) 16 (8.3) 7 (13.2) 1.54 (0.74–3.18) 1.38 (0.59–3.23) 2.48 (0.93–6.61) 2.85 (0.94–8.62)
Esbiothrin
0–11 months
No 227 (53.7) 68 (35.2) 21 (39.6) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 10 (2.4) 11 (5.7) 4 (7.5) 3.67 (1.50–9.02) 3.03 (1.13–8.09) 4.32 (1.25–14.98) 3.19 (0.77–13.19)
12–23 months
No 144 (34.0) 83 (43.0) 22 (41.5) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 14 (3.3) 14 (7.3) 7 (13.2) 1.74 (0.79–3.82) 1.66 (0.67–4.13) 3.27 (1.19–9.00) 3.71 (1.18–11.62)
Tetramethrin
0–11 months
No 214 (50.6) 68 (35.2) 17 (32.1) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 23 (5.4) 11 (5.7) 8 (15.1) 1.51 (0.70–3.25) 1.56 (0.65–3.72) 4.38 (1.70–11.25) 6.19 (2.07–18.56)
12–23 months
No 134 (31.7) 78 (40.4) 27 (50.9) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 24 (5.7) 17 (8.8) 2 (3.8) 1.22 (0.66–2.40) 1.35 (0.59–3.07) 0.41 (0.09–1.85) 0.47 (0.09–2.48)
d-Phenothrin
0–11 months
No 234 (55.3) 72 (37.3) 24 (45.3) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 3 (0.7) 7 (3.6) 1 (1.9) 7.58 (1.91–30.08) 4.16 (0.85–20.29) 3.25 (0.33–32.48) 1.64 (0.16–19.68)
12–23 months
No 155 (36.6) 93 (48.2) 25 (47.2) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 3 (0.7) 4 (2.1) 4 (7.5) 2.22 (0.49–10.15) 0.69 (0.10–4.88) 8.27 (1.75–39.16) 8.43 (1.59–44.75)
d-Allethrin
0–11 months
No 213 (50.3) 68 (35.2) 17 (32.1) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 24 (5.7) 11 (5.7) 8 (15.1) 1.43 (0.67–3.08) 1.56 (0.65–3.72) 4.18 (1.63–10.70) 6.19 (2.07–18.56)
12–23 months
No 132 (31.2) 78 (40.4) 27 (50.9) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 26 (6.1) 19 (9.8) 2 (3.8) 1.24 (0.64–2.38) 1.54 (0.70–3.39) 0.38 (0.08–1.68) 0.46 (0.09–2.40)
Solvents
0–11 months
No 205 (48.5) 59 (30.1) 13 (24.5) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 32 (7.5) 20 (10.4) 12 (22.6) 2.17 (1.16–4.07) 2.17 (1.06–4.43) 5.91 (2.48–14.10) 6.70 (2.50–17.97)
12–23 months
No 122 (28.8) 70 (36.3) 20 (37.7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 36 (8.5) 27 (14.0) 9 (17.0) 1.31 (0.73–2.33) 1.32 (0.66–2.63) 1.52 (0.64–3.64) 1.82 (0.68–4.84)
aaORs by use of oral contraceptives during pregnancy, maternal age and education, child’s birth weight and skin color.


Article Categories:
  • Research

Keywords: childhood cancer, infant leukemia, lactation, pesticides, pregnancy.

Previous Document:  Association of TP53 codon 72 polymorphism with susceptibility to ovarian carcinomas in Serbian women...
Next Document:  Diffuse cerebral language representation in tuberous sclerosis complex.