Document Detail

Improved Data Reporting in RQES: From Volumes 49, 59, to 84.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  25412125     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
This commentary provides a review of changes in data reporting in Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport from Volumes 49 and 59 to 84. Improvements were noted in that all articles reported means, standard deviations, and sample sizes, while most (87%) articles reported an estimate of effect size (ES). Additional reporting recommendations were made about ES for mean differences, use of appropriate estimates of variability, when to use a table or figure, use of multivariate analyses, and power analyses.
Jerry R Thomas
Related Documents :
24678225 - Metachronous multifocal myxoid liposarcoma involving the gastrointestinal tract. manage...
17908355 - Gorlin's syndrome presenting with myolipoma of tongue base.
20529415 - Olfactory reference syndrome: a systematic review of the world literature.
8107165 - The role of reduced calorie intake test in diagnosing gilbert syndrome--a case report.
22521675 - Primary malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the cauda equina with metastasis to ...
11862175 - Subungual myxoid cysts: clinical manifestations and response to therapy.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Research quarterly for exercise and sport     Volume:  85     ISSN:  0270-1367     ISO Abbreviation:  Res Q Exerc Sport     Publication Date:  2014 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-11-21     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8006373     Medline TA:  Res Q Exerc Sport     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  446-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  C. H. McCloy Lecture: Reflections on Socialization Into Physical Education: An Intergenerational Per...
Next Document:  The importance of peer review: thoughts on knudson, morrow, and Thomas (2014).