Document Detail


Importance of diastolic fractional flow reserve and dobutamine challenge in physiologic assessment of myocardial bridging.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12875756     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: This study reports a comparative assessment of the hemodynamic relevance of myocardial bridges (MB) using two modalities of fractional flow reserve (FFR), with and without concomitant inotropic challenge. BACKGROUND: Extravascular coronary compression by means of MB is modulated by myocardial inotropism and causes intracoronary systolic pressure overshooting and negative systolic gradients across the MB. The former characteristic suggests that adequate hemodynamic assessment of MB should include inotropic stimulation. The latter characteristic might interfere with FFR by decreasing the mean pressure gradient. METHODS: We compared the hemodynamic relevance of 12 lone MB in symptomatic patients using conventional (mean) and diastolic FFR. Diastolic FFR was obtained from post-processed, digitally acquired electrocardiogram and pressure signals. Previously validated cut off values of 0.75 (mean FFR) and 0.76 (diastolic FFR) for hemodynamic relevance were used. Measurements were performed at baseline and after incremental intravenous dobutamine doses. RESULTS: Fractional flow reserve decreased during dobutamine challenge: mean FFR was 0.90 +/- 0.04 at baseline and 0.84 +/- 0.06 after dobutamine (p = 0.0008); similarly, diastolic FFR was 0.88 +/- 0.05 and 0.77 +/- 0.10 before and after dobutamine, respectively (p = 0.0006). Diastolic FFR identified hemodynamic relevance in five patients, whereas mean FFR did so in only one patient. The discrepancy between mean FFR and diastolic FFR increased with dobutamine challenge: the ratio of mean FFR/diastolic FFR was 1.03 at baseline and 1.09 after dobutamine (p = 0.02). During the administration of dobutamine, the discrepancy was inversely related to the systolic pressure gradient (r = 0.58, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Physiologic assessment of MB should include dobutamine challenge. Because the overshooting of systolic pressure interferes with and is a cause of error in FFR measurements based on mean pressures, diastolic FFR appears to be the technique of choice for MB assessment, whereas mean FFR should be used with caution.
Authors:
Javier Escaned; Jorge Cortés; Alex Flores; Javier Goicolea; Fernando Alfonso; Rosana Hernández; Antonio Fernández-Ortiz; Manel Sabaté; Camino Bañuelos; Carlos Macaya
Related Documents :
3971506 - Coronary diastolic pressure-flow relation and zero flow pressure explained on the basis...
6860516 - Simultaneous recording of continuous arterial pressure, heart rate, and st segment in a...
1852056 - Effects of platelet-activating factor on beta- and h2-receptor-mediated increase of myo...
4999636 - Left ventricular performance and coronary flow after coronary embolization with plastic...
849036 - A new wire-supported shunt for carotid endarterectomy.
22209226 - A hyperbaric oxygen chamber for animal experimental purposes.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Validation Studies    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the American College of Cardiology     Volume:  42     ISSN:  0735-1097     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.     Publication Date:  2003 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2003-07-23     Completed Date:  2003-08-20     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8301365     Medline TA:  J Am Coll Cardiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  226-33     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Interventional Cardiology Service, Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. jescaned.hcsc@salud.madrid.org
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adenosine / diagnostic use
Aged
Angina Pectoris / etiology
Bias (Epidemiology)
Blood Flow Velocity*
Blood Pressure
Cardiotonic Agents / diagnostic use*
Coronary Angiography / methods*,  standards
Coronary Vessel Anomalies / complications,  diagnosis*,  physiopathology*
Diastole*
Dobutamine / diagnostic use*
Electrocardiography
Female
Heart Catheterization / methods*,  standards
Humans
Least-Squares Analysis
Linear Models
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Selection
Predictive Value of Tests
Severity of Illness Index
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Systole
Vasodilator Agents / diagnostic use
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Cardiotonic Agents; 0/Vasodilator Agents; 34368-04-2/Dobutamine; 58-61-7/Adenosine

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Determinants of target vessel failure in chronic total coronary occlusions after stent implantation....
Next Document:  Clinical outcome of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery in the two months following coronary ste...