Document Detail


Impairing loyalty: corporate responsibility for clinical misadventure.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21877962     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
A medical device manufacturer pays a surgeon to demonstrate a novel medical instrument in a live broadcast to an audience of specialists in another city. The surgical patient is unaware of the broadcast and unaware of the doctor's relationship with the manufacturer. It turns out that the patient required a different surgical approach to her condition-one that would not have allowed a demonstration of the instrument-and she later dies. The paper is an exploration of whether the manufacturer shares, along with the doctor, responsibility for the death of the patient. Three arguments for corporate responsibility are considered; two are criticized and the third is offered as sound.
Authors:
Kenneth Kipnis
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American journal of bioethics : AJOB     Volume:  11     ISSN:  1536-0075     ISO Abbreviation:  Am J Bioeth     Publication Date:  2011 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-08-31     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100898738     Medline TA:  Am J Bioeth     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  3-9     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
a University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Why do they exercise less? Barriers to exercise in high-anxiety-sensitive women.
Next Document:  Assessing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in egg donation: implications for human embr...